Calvo-Aguilar O, Vásquez-Martínez J, Hernández-Cuevas J

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 72-78
PDF size: 396.39 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Background: Post-cesarean hysterectomy is the most extensive procedure used during the postpartum stage. This is an indicator of quality substantially associated with extreme obstetric morbidity.
Objective: To determine the incidence, indications, and complications associated with obstetric hysterectomy in a hospital, after three years to implement the program of prevention and management of massive obstetric hemorrhage.
Material and Method: Observational, transversal, retrospective and descriptive study conducted from January 2011 to November 2013. We records patients who underwent obstetric hysterectomy, of any age and at any time during pregnancy were reviewed. The results are expressed as frequencies, percentages and central tendency measures.
Results: 38 patients were recorded with obstetric hysterectomy. We found prevalence of 18.4 per 10,000, and incidence per year of 1.7, 1.4 and 2.6 per 1,000 births for 2011, 2012 and 2013. The prevalence of post-cesarean hysterectomy was 63.05 per 10,000 while postpartum was 9.05 per 10,000 births. The only difference between scheduled and emergency surgery was operating time. The procedure is associated with anemia in postpartum 13 times and the main indications for the procedures were hypo/atony and placenta accrete.
Conclusions: The prenatal diagnoses of placenta accrete and improvement in the use of blood products and surgical technique has eliminated maternal mortality by massive obstetric hemorrhage in the last three years at the General Hospital “Dr. Aurelio Valdivieso”.

REFERENCES

1. Briceño-Pérez C, Briceño-Sanabria L, García S, Jaimes T, Briceño-Sanabria JC, Briceño-Sanabria C. Histerectomía obstétrica: análisis de 15 años. Rev Obstet Ginecol Venez 2009;69(2):89-96.

2. Flood KM, Said S, Geary M, et al. Changing trends in peripartum hysterectomy over the last 4 decades. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:632.e1-632.e6.

3. Wright JD, Pri-Paz S, Herzog TJ, et al. Predictors of massive blood loss in women with placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:38.e1-e6.

4. Reveles VJA, Villegas RG, Hernández HS, Grover PF, Hernández VCC, Patiño SA. Histerectomía obstétrica, incidencia, indicaciones y complicaciones. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2008;76(3):156-60.

5. Briery CM, Rose CH, Hudson WT, et al. Planned vs emergent cesarean hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:154-e1-e5.

6. Aguirre-Gas HG, Campos-Castolo EM, Carrillo-Jaimes A, Zavala-Suárez E, Fajardo-Dolci G. Análisis crítico de quejas CONAMED 1996-2007. Rev CONAMED 2008;13:5-16.

7. Bautista-Gómez E, Morales-García V, Hernández-Cuevas J, Calvo-Aguilar O, Flores-Romero AL. Acretismo placentario: una alternativa quirúrgica que puede salvar vidas. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2012;80(2):79-83.

8. Aguirre-Gas H. El error médico. Eventos adversos. Rev CONAMED 2005;11(4):36-41.

9. Nava FJ, Páez AJ, Veloz MG, Sánchez VV, Hernández VM. Indicaciones y factores de riesgo para histerectomía obstétrica de urgencia. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2002;70:289-94.