medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia

ISSN 2395-9215 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de Difusión de la Facultad de Odontología de la UNAM
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 2

Next >>

Rev Mex Ortodon 2016; 4 (2)

Dilemma represented by mandibular prognatism

Grageda NE
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 80-83
PDF size: 198.76 Kb.


Key words:

No keywords

Text Extraction

Much can be said about multiple diagnostic alternatives and treatments known to this date for treatment of class III malcoclusions, nevertheless, oftentimes results obtained can be poor, slow and even frustrating for the specialist.
How could it be explained to a patient that after visiting three dentists, and having used multiple class III functional appliances such as chin cups, facial masks, expansion and extraction of premolars for a seven year period, that he still requires orthognathic surgery, two further years of treatment, multiple gingival grafts in lower incisors, crowns in molars due to decalcification, as well as life-long follow-up of his short roots?


REFERENCES

  1. Yang X, Li C, Bai D, Su N, Chen T, Xu Y et al. Treatment effectiveness of Fränkel function regulator on the Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014; 146 (2): 143-154.

  2. Baik HS, Jee SH, Lee KJ, Oh TK. Treatment effects of Fränkel functional regulator III in children with class III malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 125 (3): 294-301.

  3. Levin AS, McNamara JA Jr, Franchi L, Baccetti T, Fränkel C. Short-term and long-term treatment outcomes with the FR-3 appliance of Fränkel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 134 (4): 513-524.

  4. Deguchi T, McNamara JA. Craniofacial adaptations induced by chincup therapy in Class III patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999; 115 (2): 175-182.

  5. Ritucci R, Nanda R. The effect of chin cup therapy on the growth and development of the cranial base and midface. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1986; 90 (6): 475-483.

  6. Ngan P. Early treatment of Class III malocclusion: is it worth the burden? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129 (4 Suppl): S82-S85.

  7. Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA. Postpubertal assessment of treatment timing for maxillary expansion and protraction therapy followed by fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 126 (5): 555-568.

  8. Machado AW, MacGinnis M, Damis L, Moon W. Spontaneous improvement of gingival recession after correction of tooth positioning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014; 145 (6): 828-835.

  9. Sameshima GT, Sinclair PM. Predicting and preventing root resorption: Part I. Diagnostic factors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001; 119 (5): 505-510.

  10. Sameshima GT, Sinclair PM. Predicting and preventing root resorption: Part II. Treatment factors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001; 119 (5): 511-515.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Ortodon. 2016;4