medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirugía Plástica

ISSN 2992-8559 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0625 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • Policies
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2015, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Cir Plast 2015; 25 (2)

Experience with the use of hyperbaric oxygen in auricle postsurgical reconstruction with skin pocket ischemia

Gutiérrez GC, Ferreira AFE, Moreno CJE, Ruiz-Funes MAP, Del Hierro GCE
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 90-96
PDF size: 369.18 Kb.


Key words:

Microtia, auricle reconstruction, hyperbaric oxygen therapy.

ABSTRACT

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is defined as the systemic intermittent administration of 100% oxygen under a greater pressure than the atmospheric one. Skin pocket ischemia has been reported in the graft between 9.8 and 13.8% of the patients after auricular reconstruction. The hyperbaric oxygen chamber has been effectively at reducing tissue ischemia in other pathologies. There are no reports of this auxiliary therapy in patients with auricular reconstruction. The objective of this study is to report our experience using hyperbaric oxygen in 15 cases after surgery in auricle reconstruction that show a complication ischemia of the skin pocket and were sent to the hyperbaric chamber. We carried out an observational, descriptive, prolective and transversal study to analyze patient’s clinical files and photographs of patients after surgery of auricle reconstruction with skin pocket ischemia of the skin graft sent to a hyperbaric oxygen chamber. The number of sessions was an average of 13.3 per patient. There were three reoperations. There were no hyperbaric oxygen therapy complications, therefore, we concluded the use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in postsurgical auricular reconstruction patients with skin pocket ischemia was a useful tool to improve oxygenation in hypoxic tissues, however, we must evaluate the risk/benefit for the possibility of ear barotrauma in healthy ears, even though this was not the case in this study.


REFERENCES

  1. Goldman RJ. Hyperbaric oxygen for wound healing and limb salvage. PM R 2009; 1(15): 471-489.

  2. Henshaw NA, Simpson A. Compressed air as a therapeutic agent in the treatment of consumption, asthma, chronic bronchitis and other diseases. Edinburg: Sutherland; 1857.

  3. Escobar SJ, Slade JB, Hunt TK, Cianci P. Adjuvant hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO2) for treatment of necrotizing fasciitis reduces mortality and amputation rate. Undersea Hyperb Med 2005; 32(6): 437-443.

  4. Löndahl M. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy as treatment of diabetic foot ulcer. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2012; 28(1): 78-84.

  5. Qi Z, Gao CJ, Wang YB, Ma XM, Zhao L, Liu FJ et al. Effects of hyperbaric oxygen preconditioning on ischemia-reperfusion inflammation and skin flap survival. Chin Med J 2013; 126(20): 3904-3909.

  6. Zhang Q, Chang Q, Robert A, Gong X, Gould LJ. Hyperbaric oxygen attenuates apoptosis and decreases inflammation in an ischemic wound model. J Invest Dermatol 2008; 128: 2102-2112.

  7. Gutiérrez C, Pérez M, Barona DI, León D, Cárdenas A. Reconstrucción auricular, experiencia de tres años, Hospital General “Dr. Manuel Gea González”. Cir Plast 2005; 15(3): 150-157.

  8. Nagata S. A new method of total reconstruction of the auricle for microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 92: 187-201.

  9. Firmin F. Ear reconstruction in cases of typical microtia. Personal experience based on 352 microtic ear corrections. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1998; 32: 35-47.

  10. Mantilla M. Reconstrucción auricular experiencia de 24 años. Cir Plast Iberolatinoam 2008; 34(2): 107-118.

  11. Plafki C, Peters P, Almeling M, Welslau W, Busch R. Complications and side effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Aviat Space Environ Med 2000; 71(2): 119-124.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Plast. 2015;25