medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Anales de Radiología, México

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Anales de Radiología México 2016; 15 (2)

Correlation between increase in prostate-specific antigen and metastatic lesions identified by imaging

Hernández-Salazar JJ, Onofre-Castillo JJ, García-Pacheco LE, Dávila-Cavazos DA, Torres-Gómez E, Santana-Vela IA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 88-93
PDF size: 675.88 Kb.


Key words:

prostate cancer, prostate-specific antigen, tomography, metastasis.

ABSTRACT

Prostatic adenocarcinoma is the most common form of cancer in men over 40 in the western population. Imaging methods have substantial value in detecting foci of lesions suggestive of metastatic disease in patients with prostate cancer. Recurrence or persistence following treatment is first detected by an increase in prostate-specific antigen. Between 30 and 70% of such patients have lesions which are visible by imaging methods.
Objetive: show association between increase in prostate-specific antigen and metastasis by means of different imaging methods: magnetic resonance, computed axial tomography, and ultrasound.
Materials and Methods: all patients with known diagnosis of prostate cancer who visited our hospital from January 2014 through September of the same year were included. Forty-nine patients were included, with known diagnosis of prostate cancer, with mean age of 67 years (range 53-87). Patients with lesions suggestive of metastasis were included in the group of cases, whereas individuals who presented a negative image study for metastatic disease were included in a control group.
Results: the mean value of prostate-specific antigen in the group of cases was 53 ng/mL (median 73) whereas in the control group it was 2.1 ng/mL (range 0.01-7.3). An equation of crossed products was made, finding that there is an odds ratio 34.5 times greater in the probability of suffering metastatic disease with prostate-specific antigen above its normal value [OR 34.5, 95% CI (33-36)]. It was complemented with a contrast hypothesis test, documenting a value of 21.21, with 1 degree of liberty, to obtain a p ‹ 0.025, which concludes that it is statistically significant.
Conclusion: our study showed a significant association between increase in prostate-specific antigen and the presence of disease disseminated to other organs. It documented that an increase in antigenemia above 10 ng/mL is highly suggestive of metastatic disease. We suggest that image study be mandatory in all patients with antigenemia above 10 ng/mL.


REFERENCES

  1. Jemal A, Thomas A, Murray T, Thun M. Cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52:23-47.

  2. Manyak M, Javitt M. The role of computerized tomography, magnetic resonanceimaging, bone scan, and monoclonal antibody nuclear scan for prognosis predictionin prostate cancer. Semin Urol Oncol. 1998;16:145-152.

  3. van der Cruijsen-Koeter IW, Vis AN, Roobol MJ, Wildhagen MF, de Koning HJ, van der Kwast TH, Schroder FH. Comparison of screen detected and clinically diagnosed prostate cancer in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer, section rotterdam. Urol. 2005 jul;174(1):121-5. Cuadro 1. Antígeno prostático específico en el grupo de casos Antígeno prostático específico Menor de 4 ng/mL 4-10 ng/mL Mayor de 10 ng/mL Porcentaje 18 26 56 Cuadro 2. Comparación entre metástasis óseas y no óseas en el grupo de casos Metástasis ósea Metástasis no ósea 88% 12%

  4. Ornstein DK, Oh J, Herschman JD, Andriole GL. Evaluation and management ofthe man who has failed primary curative therapy for prostate cancer. UrolClinNorth Am. 1998;25:591-601.

  5. Chapter 8: What is the prostate and what is its function?». American Society of Andrology Handbook. Consultado el 17-9-2006.

  6. Thompson IM, Pauler DK, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM, Lucia MS, Parnes HL, Minasian LM, Ford LG, Lippman SM, Crawford ED, Crowley JJ, Coltman CA Jr (May 27, 2004). Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostatespecific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter. N Engl J Med 350(22):2239-46.

  7. Miller, DC, Hafez, KS, Stewart, A, et al. Prostate carcinoma presentation, diagnosis, and staging: an update form the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer 2003;98:1169. PMID 12973840

  8. Carlin BI, Andriole GL. The natural history,skeletal complications, and managementof bone metastases in patients with prostatecarcinoma . Cancer 2000;88(12Suppl):2989-2994.

  9. Wechsel HW, Gleichmann R, Blasseneck J. The behavior of prostate specifi c antigen (PSA) and free-PSA (f-PSA) under antihormonaltherapy. Anticancer Res 2000;20(6D):4993- 4994.

  10. Prostate. In: Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al., eds.: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York, NY: Springer, 2010, pp. 457-68.

  11. http://www.cancer.org/cancer/prostatecancer/overviewguide/ prostate-cancer-overview-survival-rates

  12. http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/cancerstats/ types/prostate/survival/prostate-cancer-survivalstatistics

  13. Nobuyoshi Fukumitsu. A comparative study of prostate specific antigen (PSA), C-terminal propeptideof blood type I procollagen (PICP) and urine type I collagencrosslinkedN telopeptide (NTx) levels using bone scintigraphy in prostate cancer patients. Annals of Nuclear Medicine 2003;17(4):297-303.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Anales de Radiología México. 2016;15