medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Anales de Radiología, México

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Anales de Radiología México 2016; 15 (2)

Usefulness of multislice computed tomography in evaluation of neck tumors. Structured report proposal

Morales-Pérez F, Rodríguez-Nava P, Dena-Espinoza E, Vásquez-Gijón M
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 8
Page: 103-110
PDF size: 787.47 Kb.


Key words:

multislice computed tomography, benign and malignant tumors of the neck, structured report, neck spaces, diagnostic precision.

ABSTRACT

Background: multislice computed tomography is the most widely used image technique when there is a lesion in the head and neck area at any age. It evaluates locoregional extension and generates a differential diagnosis based on anatomical location.
Objetives: determine the characteristics of the lesion, decide criteria of benignancy and malignancy, and define sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic precision. We propose a structured report which guarantees the proper interpretation.
Material and Methods: a transverse, observational study. Fifty-two patients were analyzed determining the characteristics of lesions, criteria of benignancy and malignancy, anatomical localization of lesion, and clinical and histopathological correlations.
Results: of malignant lesions 71% were lymphomas, of the benign lesions 42% corresponded to diffuse multinodular goiter and, of the inflammatory processes 50% were abscesses. The spaces most affected were the visceral, masticator, and pharyngeal mucosa. Sensitivity of 93%, 89% specificity, and 90% diagnostic precision were obtained. We propose a structured report that evaluates the characteristics necessary to issue a diagnosis.
Conclusions: multislice computed tomography has the capability to identify benign and malignant lesions of the neck with diagnostic precision of 90%. The systematic use of a structured report will help the radiologist achieve greater diagnostic precision.


REFERENCES

  1. Rovira A, Ramos A, et al. Actualizaciones SERAM Radiología de Cabeza y Cuello. Madrid. Editorial Médica Panamericana, S. A. 2010. pp. 2-21.

  2. Som PM, Curtin HD. Head and Neck Imaging. Fourth Edition. United States of America: Mosby; 2003. pp. 1805-1827.

  3. Harnsberger HR. Manual de Diagnóstico por la Imagen de la Cabeza y Cuello. Segunda Edición. pp. 19-119.

  4. Besada C, Ulla M, Levy E y cols. Tomografía computada multislice: aplicaciones en SNC y cabeza y cuello. ¿Cómo, cuándo, por qué y para qué?. RAR 2009;73(2):153-160.

  5. Charan I, Kapoor A, Kumar N y cols. Evaluation of Neck Mass with Computed Tomography: An Observational Study. International Journal of Scientific Study 2014;2(7):118-122.

  6. Shrestha MK, Ghartimagar D, Ghosh A. Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomogram in the Evaluation of a Neck Mass. J Nepal Med Assoc 2011;51(4):164-170.

  7. David MY, Kathleen M. Head and neck lesions. Radiologic Pathologic correlations. Radiologic Clinics of North America 1998;36(5):983-1014.

  8. Gupta P, Bhargava SK, Mehrotra G y cols. Role of Multislice Spiral C.T. in the Evaluation of Neck Masses. JIMSA 2013;26(1):51-54.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Anales de Radiología México. 2016;15