2016, Number S1
<< Back Next >>
Rev Mex Anest 2016; 39 (S1)
Options for neuroaxial approach. Taylor access
Rebollo-Manrique RE
Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 182-184
PDF size: 154.95 Kb.
Text Extraction
No abstract.
REFERENCES
Longnecker D, Brown D, Newman M, Zapol W. Section D. Regional. Neuraxial anesthesia. In: Anesthesiology. Chapter 46. Ed. McGraw-Hill, 2010.
Miller R, Cohen N, Eriksson L, Fleisher L. IV Anesthesia management. 51. Spinal, Epidural, and caudal anesthesia. Miller Anesthesia. 8ª ed. Ed. Elsevier. 2016.
Exadaktylos AK, Buggy DJ, Moriarty DC, et al. Can anesthetic technique for primary breast cancer surgery affect recurrence or metastasis? Anaesthesiology. 2006;105:660-664.
Horlocker TT. Complications of regional anesthesia and acute pain management. Anesthesiology Clin. 2011;29:257-278.
Butterworth J, Mackey D, Wasnick J. Section IV Regional Anesthesia and Pain management. 45 Spinal, Epidural, & Caudal Blocks. In: Clinical anesthesiology. 5a ed. Ed. MacGraw Hill, 2013.
Taylor JA. Lumbosacral subarachnoid tap. J Urol. 1940;43:561-564.
Lim YC, Choo CY, Tan KT. A randomized controlled trial of ultrasound assisted spinal anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014;42:191-198.
Kallidaikurichi SK, Iohom G, Loughnane F, Lee PJ. Conventional landmark-guided midline versus preprocedure ultrasound-guided paramedian techniques in spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2015;121:1089-1096.
Lee P, Tang R, Sawka A, Krebs C, Vaghadia H. Real-time ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia using Taylor’s approach. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:1236-1238.
Full text