medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Médica de Costa Rica y Centroamérica

Colegio de Medicos y Cirujanos República de Costa Rica
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2015, Number 615

<< Back Next >>

Rev Med Cos Cen 2015; 72 (615)

Manejo de la fisura anal

Rivera AJA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 339-342
PDF size: 181.44 Kb.


Key words:

No keywords

ABSTRACT

The use of atypical antipsychotics has significant improvements in the treatment of schizophrenia. Most patients do not experience extrapyramidal side effects of typical drugs, including frequent irreversible tardive dyskinesia and less sustained elevation of prolactin. However, serious adverse reactions may also occur with atypical antipsychotics without proper treatment monitoring. While the atypical antipsychotics have modest efficacy advantages over typical antipsychotics on positive symptoms of psychosis, they are more effective in treating the negative symptoms. Furthermore, it has recently been proposed that this group of drugs improve cell survival and enhance neurogenesis.


REFERENCES

  1. Azadeño, G. (2004). Efectos adversos asocuados al tratamiento con antipsicóticos atípicos. SESCAM.

  2. Brunton, L. L., Chabner, B. A., & Knollmann, B. C. (2011). Goodman & Gilman’s The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 12e. E.U.: McGraw- Hill.

  3. Furtado, V., Srihari, V., & Kumar, A. (2012). Atypical antipsychotics for people with both schizophrenia and depression. Cochrane Collaboration.

  4. Garcia, M., & Medina , E. (2012). Treatment patterns un major depressive disorder after an inadequate response to first lin antidepressant tratment. BMC Psychiatry.

  5. Hermes, E., & Sernyak, M. (2013). Use of second generation antipsychotic agents for sleep and sedation: a provider survey. Sleep, 36, 597-600.

  6. Karandeep, N., & Agius, M. (2012). The differences between typical and atypical antipsychotics: the effects on neurogenesis. Psychiatria Danubia, 24, 95-99.

  7. Keks, N. (2004). Are atypical antipsychotics advantegeous? , 146-9.

  8. Leonard, C. (2013). Antipsychotics and the risks of sudden cardiac death and all cause of death: Cohort Studies in Medicaid and Dually-Eligible. 10, 1-9.

  9. Lobo, A., & De la Mata, J. (2010). Nuevos Antipsicóticos. Salud Mental y Psiquiatría.

  10. Mailman, R. B., & Murthy, V. (2010). Third generation antipsychotic drugs: partial agonism or receptor functional selectivity? Current Pharmaceutical Design, 488–501.

  11. Medrano, J., Pacheco, L., & Zardoya, J. (2009). Uso No Autorizado de Psicofármacos . Real Decreto .

  12. NICE. (2010). Schizophrenia. The NICE Guideline on Core Interventios in the Treatment and Management of Schizophrenia in Adults in Primary and Secondary care. British Library.

  13. Nicolas, A., & et al. (2010). Efficacy of atypical vs typical antipsychotics in the treatment of early psychosis: meta-analysis. BJP(196), 434-9.

  14. Sumiyoshi, T. (2013). Antipsychotic treatments, focus on Lurasidone. Frontiers inf pharmacology, 1-7.

  15. Tenjin, T., Miyamoto, S., & Ninomiya, Y. (2013). Profile of blonanserin for the treatment schizophrenia. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 587–594




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Med Cos Cen. 2015;72