medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Médica de Costa Rica y Centroamérica

Colegio de Medicos y Cirujanos República de Costa Rica
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2015, Number 615

<< Back Next >>

Rev Med Cos Cen 2015; 72 (615)

Mecanismos fisiológicos de la fatiga neuromuscular

Arce RE
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 461-464
PDF size: 160.19 Kb.


Key words:

muscular fiber, maximal and submaximal muscular contraction, action potential, sarcoplasma, motor unit, motorneuron.

ABSTRACT

The term fatigue is commonly used to describe a reversible decreased performance or an increase in the real or perceived difficulty to accomplish a physical activity. Often understood as the inability to maintain a required level of muscular force, fatigue leads to stop the effort and depends on several variables. Fatigue is a complex and multifactorial phenomenon whose mechanisms are based on factors related to the exercise (exercise type, speed, duration of muscle contraction etc) and factors related to the individual during the exercise (energy reserves, sex, age, physical conditioning, emotional state, stress levels). Evidence indicates, when exercise is maximal or sub maximal, that fatigue comes from a neuromuscular decrease in force production after different physiological phenomena. To understand fatigue it is necessary to be clear about the physiology of skeletal muscle contraction. There are several mechanisms described explaining fatigue and its adaptive and protective properties. Fatigue is originated from peripheral and central pathways.


REFERENCES

  1. Ament W, Verkerke GJ. Exercise and fatigue. Sports Med 2009; vol 39: pag 389-422.

  2. Boron W, Boulpaep E. Cellular physiology of skeletal, cardiac, and smooth muscle. Medical physiology 2011 pags 237-264). philadelphia USA: Saunders Elsevier.

  3. Boyas S, Guevel A. Neuromuscular fatigue in healthy muscle: Underlying factors and adaptation mechanisms. Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine. 2011 vol 54, pags 88 -108.

  4. Dahlstedt AJ, Katz A, Westerblad H. Role of myoplasmic phosphate in Contractile function of skeletal muscle: studies on creatine kinasedeficient mice. J Physiol 2001; Vol 533 pag:379–388.

  5. Garland SJ, Gossen ER. The muscular wisdom hypothesis in human muscle fatigue. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2002; Vol 30 pag:45–49.

  6. Håkan Westerblad, Joseph D. Bruton, Abram Katz. (March 2010). skeletal muscle: energy metabolism, fiber types, fatigue and adaptability. Experimental cell research, 2010. Vol 316, pags 3093 - 3099.

  7. Kayser B. Exercise starts and ends in the brain. Eur J Appl Physiol2003; Vol 90: pag411–419.

  8. McLester JR. Muscle contraction and fatigue: the role of adenosine 5’- diphosphate and inorganic phosphate. Sports Med 1997; Vol 23: pags 287– 305.

  9. Millar NC, Homsher E. The effect of phosphate and calcium on force

  10. generation in glycerinated rabbit skeletal muscle fibers. A steady-state and transient kinetic study. J Biol Chem 1990;265:20234–40.

  11. Westerblad H, Allen DG, Lannergren J. Muscle fatigue: lactic acid or inorganic phosphate the major cause? News Physiol Sci 2002;17: 17–21.

  12. WilmoreJ . Costill D2004. Basic energetic systems. Physiology of sports and exercise. Pags 114-145 USA, Human kinetics.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Med Cos Cen. 2015;72