medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Salud Mental

ISSN 0185-3325 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2005, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Salud Mental 2005; 28 (1)

Treatment preference and attitude toward pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy in Latin America. ULAD Task Force.

Heinze G, Cortés JF
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 15
Page: 10-17
PDF size: 147.04 Kb.


Key words:

Psychodrugs, attitude, pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy.

ABSTRACT

The development of psychopharmacolgy has reached a considerable progress in the treatment of mental illnesses, although patients have an ambivalent opinion regarding its use. It is generally believed that psychoactive drugs produce secondary effects, such as the potential capacity to create addiction. Little is known about the health professionals’ attitude towards the risks or benefits of psychopharmacology in the treatment of mental illnesses.
Objective
To determine the preferences towards the type of treatment (psychopharmacology vs. psychotherapy) and the attitudes in regard to the specific use of psychodrugs that prevail among health professionals in 13 countries of Latin America.
Method
A total of l868 surveys was applied to psychiatrists, non-psychiatric doctors, and psychologists in l3 countries of Latin America. The survey covered the following items: a) questionnaire on the preferences regarding the treatment of mental illnesses, including personality disorders; b) attitude scale on the use of psychodrugs, and c) patient’s attitude perceived by doctors while prescribing psychotherapeutical drugs.
Results
Pharmacotherapy was preferred by non-psychiatric doctors; psychologists had a negative attitude towards its use pointing out its secondary effects and the risk of addiction; psychiatrists and non-psychiatric doctors held a more favorable opinion. Doctors’ opinion as to the patients’ attitude towards psychotherapeutical drugs indicates that the latter accept taking them when they are properly informed regarding its use.
Conclusion
There is no doubt that psychiatrists and non-psychiatric doctors have a better knowledge about the benefits offered by psychoactive drugs and their potential secondary effects. Psychologists postulate psychotherapy as basic treatment because their knowledge about the benefits of pharmacological treatment is limited. Non- psychiatric doctors have a medical education that permits them to know more deeply the therapeutical action of psychotherapeutical drugs despite knowing less about the psychotherapeutical process.


REFERENCES

  1. 1. ANGERMEYER MC, HELT T: Pro and contra: psychoterapy and psychopharmacotherapy attitude of the public. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol, 43(3):286-92, 1993.

  2. 2. ANGERMEYER MC, MATSCHINGER H: Attitude of medical students to treatment with psychotropic drugs. 1: Comparison between medical students and the general population. Psychiatry Prax, 21(2):58-63, 1994.

  3. 3. Benkert OHM, Kepplinger K: Sobota Psychopharmaka im Widerstreit. Berlin, Heidelber, New York, 1995.

  4. 4. BENKERT OHM, et al.: Public opinion on psychotropic drugs: an analysis of the factors influencing acceptance or rejection. J Nervous Mental, 185(3):151-158, 1997.

  5. 5. Heinze G, Torres M, Cortes J: Attitudes of health professionals towards prescribing psychodrugs. Salud Mental, 22(6):1-7, 1999.

  6. 6. Hillert A, Sandmann J: Attitude of medical students to treatment with psychotropic drugs. 2: Change in attitude in the course of medical education. Psychiatry Prax, 21(2): 64-9, 1994.

  7. 7. Hillert A, Sandmann J: Psychopharmaceutical drugs in the mass media. Results of a systematic analysis of text contents and images. Nervenarzt, 66(11):835-844, 1995.

  8. 8. Hillert A, Sandmann J: Psychopharmacological drugs as represented in the press: results of systematic analysis of newpapers and popular magazines. Pharmacopsychiat, 29:67-71, 1996.

  9. 9. Manheimer DI, St. Davison MB, Balter GD: Popular attitudes and beliefs about tranquilizers. Amer J Psychiatry, 130:1248-1253, 1973.

  10. 10. Nunnally JC: Popular conceptions of mental health. New York, 1961.

  11. 11. Schneider US Wieser: Der psychich kranke in den massenmedien. Ergebnisse einer systematischen inhaltsanalyse. Fortscher. Neurol Psychiat, 40:136-163, 1972.

  12. 12. Van Putten TPRA, May SR: Response to antipsychotic medication: The doctor and the consumer´s view. Amer J Psychiatry, 141:6-19, 1984.

  13. 13. Heinze G, Torres M, Cortes J: Attitudes of health professionals towards prescribing drugs. Salud Mental, 22(6): 1-7, 1999.

  14. 14. Keller MB et al.: A comparison, the cognitive behavioral-analysis system of psychotherapy and their combination for the treatment of clinical depression. New England J Medicine, 342(20):1462-1470, 2000.

  15. 15. Hollon S, Tase M, Markowitz J: Treatment and prevention of depression. Psychological Science Public Interest, 3(2):39-77, 2002.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Salud Mental. 2005;28