2016, Number 3
<< Back Next >>
Rev Mex Ortodon 2016; 4 (3)
Residual orthodontic problems of patients treated externally from the Clinic of the Center of Medical Specialties of the State of Veracruz «Dr. Rafael Lucio» (CEMEV)
Herrera NIS, Gómez CR, Quintero MBE
Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 150-154
PDF size: 185.24 Kb.
ABSTRACT
At the CEMEV Orthodontics clinic arrive patients who have previously received orthodontic treatment externally and who present different alterations. The objective of this research project was to describe the residual problems that these orthodontic patients have. In order to do this we conducted a review of the clinical records to find the initial diagnosis. 49 clinical charts were reviewed: 75% belonged to female patients with ages between 18 and 30 years. The more frequently found orthodontic problems were: molar class II on the right side, bilateral canine class II, upper midline deviation toward the right in relation to the facial midline and a lower midline deviation to the right, convex profile and upper lip protrusion. It was concluded that most patient’s treatment time was two to three years. Dental anomalies were the most frequent problem followed by skeletal issues. Therefore it is important for orthodontic treatment to be performed by a specialist.
REFERENCES
Martin D, Goenaga M, Canabez A, Gomez I, Aguirrebengoa E, Armendariz A y cols. Ortodoncia y bioestética. Ortod Esp. 2008; 48: 3-22.
Lombardo B. Conducta terapéutica ante tratamientos ortodóncicos condicionados por el paciente (caso clínico). Revista de la Facultad de Odontología (UBA). 2006; 21: 21-26. [Consultada 30 de febrero de 2013] Disponible en: http://www.odon.uba.ar/revista/2006vol21num5051/docs/fouba2006conduc.pdf
Canut J. El ortodoncista en el juzgado. Rev Esp Ortod. 2005; 35: 101-102.
Tokunaga S. Errores comunes del cirujano dentista en la consulta general en problemas ortodónticos. Rev Mex Odontol Clin. 2007; 1: 4-8.
Di Santi J, Vázquez V. Maloclusión clase I: definición, clasificación, características clínicas y tratamiento. Rev Latinoam Ortod Odontopediat. 2003. Revista electrónica [Consultada 9 de enero de 2013] Disponible en: http://www.ortodoncia.ws/publicaciones/2003/art8.asp el.
Jiménez E. Diagnóstico clínico en ortodoncia. Rev Mex Odon Clin. 2008; 2: 14-17.
Medrano J, García M, González R. Ortodoncia interdisciplinaria. Rev Nal de Odontol Mex. 2011; 3: 8-17.
— Ayala S, Cristiani F, Saralegui J. Satisfacción del paciente en un servicio de anestesia ambulatoria. Anest Analg Reanim. 2011; 24: 2. [Consultada 18 de agosto del 2013] Disponible en: http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?pid=S025581222011000200003&script=sci_arttext.
— Adegbite K, Ogunbanjo B, Ajisafe O, Adeniyi A. Knowledge of orthodontics as a dental specialty: a preliminary survey among LASUCOM students. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2012; 2: 1-18.
— Barrera J, Espinar E, Carbajosa A, Abalos C, Solano E. Valor pronóstico del indicador de posición mandibular. Ortod Esp. 2008; 48: 47-56.
— Martínez B. Manual de oclusión I quinto semestre. Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad Autónoma Benito Juárez de Oaxaca. 2011. [Consultado 17 de marzo del 2012] Disponible en: http://www.odontologia.uabjo.mx/oclusion.pdf
— Guevara M, Rodríguez M, González N. DIAG, un sistema experto para el diagnóstico de anomalías craneofaciales. Rev Cubana Invest Biomed. 1997; 16: 93-97.
— Jiménez E. Diagnóstico Clínico en Ortodoncia. Rev Mex Odon Clin. 2008; 2: 14-17.
— Medrano J, García M, González R. Ortodoncia interdisciplinaria. Rev Nal de Odontol Mex. 2011; 3: 8-17.
— Alarico L. Valoración de la estética facial en ortodoncia. Rev Med Basadrina. 2011; 5: 22-24.