medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Cirugía Endoscópica

ISSN 1665-2576 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2016; 17 (3)

Surgical revision in weight loss failure after vertical gastric sleeve. Experience report from a Mexican medical center

García GM, Islas TD, Cuellar TR, González AD
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 128-131
PDF size: 261.34 Kb.


Key words:

Sleeve gastrectomy, obesity, revision, weight loss failure.

ABSTRACT

Background: The sleeve gastrectomy was introduced as the initial procedure in highly complex bariatric surgery in the early 2000. Subsequently, it was proposed as the standard treatment due to its safety in generating weight loss. Occasionally failures in weight loss were observed, those were typically treated with conversion to a gastric bypass; in recent years however, there has been evidence of effectiveness of remodeling the sleeve instead (revision surgery) particularly when retention of the fundus is identified. Material and methods: We analyzed sleeve Gastric revision surgeries between 2014 and 2015 with loss of weight failure at 18 months postoperatively. In all patients was identified the retention of gastric fundus using barium swallow. A full sleeve remodeling was performed with removal of the gastric fundus. Results: A total of 10 individuals were included, four men and six women. The Initial body mass index average was 38.2 kg/m2, with a mean weight of 107.0 kg. The average age was 27 years. All patients had undergone a single prior bariatric surgical procedure. Two postoperative cases of atelectasis occurred and their resolution was achieved with conservative treatment. Patients were followed for up to nine months without any losses registered. The mean weight after monitoring was 88.9 kg in (p ≤ 0.001). Conclusions: The gastric sleeve revision is safe and effective in people with weight loss failure caused by the retention of gastric fundus.


REFERENCES

  1. Iannelli A, Schneck AS, Topart P, Carles M, Hébuterne X, Gugenheim J. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy followed by duodenal switch in selected patients versus single-stage duodenal switch for superobesity: case-control study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013; 9: 531-538.

  2. Regan JP, Inabnet WB, Gagner M, Pomp A. Early experience with two-staged laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as an alternative in the super–super obese patient. Obes Surg. 2003; 13: 861-864.

  3. Fezzi M, Kolotkin RL, Nedelcu M, Jaussent A, Schaub R, Chauvet MA et al. Improvement in quality of life after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2011; 21: 1161-1167.

  4. Gagner M, Rogula T. Laparoscopic reoperative sleeve gastrectomy for poor weight loss after biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Obes Surg. 2003; 13: 649-654.

  5. Baltasar A, Serra C, Pérez N, Bou R, Bengochea M. Resleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2006; 16: 1535-1538.

  6. Dapri G, Cadiére GB, Himpens J. Laparoscopic repeat sleeve gastrectomy versus duodenal switch after isolated sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011; 7: 38-43.

  7. Iannelli A, Schneck AS, Noel P, Ben Amor I, Krawczykowski D, Gugenheim J. Re-sleeve gastrectomy for failed laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a feasibility study. Obes Surg. 2011; 21: 832-835.

  8. Rebibo L, Fuks D, Verhaeghe P, Deguines JB, Dhahri A, Regimbeau JM. Repeat sleeve gastrectomy compared with primary sleeve gastrectomy: a single-center, matched case study. Obes Surg. 2012; 22: 1909-1915.

  9. Noel P, Nedelcu M, Nocca D, Schneck AS, Gugenheim J, Iannelli A et al. Revised sleeve gastrectomy: another option for weight loss failure after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2014; 28: 1096-1102.

  10. Nedelcu M, Noel P, Iannelli A, Gagner M. Revised sleeve gastrectomy (re-sleeve). Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015; 11: 1282-1288.

  11. Hutter MM, Schirmer BD, Jones DB, Ko CY, Cohen ME, Merkow RP et al. First report from the American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Center Network: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has morbidity and effectiveness positioned between the band and the bypass. Ann Surg. 2011; 254: 410-420; discussion 420-422.

  12. Chopra A, Chao E, Etkin Y, Merklinger L, Lieb J, Delany H.

  13. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity: can it be considered a definitive procedure? Surg Endosc. 2012; 26: 831-837.

  14. Bobowicz M, Lehmann A, Orlowski M, Lech P, Michalik M. Preliminary outcomes 1 year after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy based on Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS). Obes Surg. 2011; 21: 1843-1848.

  15. Berende CA, de Zoete JP, Smulders JF, Nienhuijs SW. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy feasible for bariatric revision surgery. Obes Surg. 2012; 22: 330-334.

  16. Acholonu E, McBean E, Court I, Bellorin O, Szomstein S, Rosenthal RJ. Safety and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional approach for failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2009; 19: 1612-1616.

  17. Braghetto I, Cortes C, Herquiñogo D, Csendes P, Rojas A, Mushle M et al. Evaluation of the radiological gastric capacity and evolution of the BMI 2-3 years after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2009; 19: 1262-1269.

  18. Langer FB, Bohdjalian A, Felberbauer FX, Fleischmann E, Reza-Hoda MA, Ludvik B et al. Does gastric dilatation limit the success of sleeve gastrectomy as a sole operation for morbid obesity? Obes Surg. 2006; 16: 166-171.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop. 2016;17