medigraphic.com
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública

2016, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

salud publica mex 2016; 58 (4)

Interface between bioethics and international relations

Manchola-Castillo C, Garrafa V

Language: Spanish
References: 45
Page: 476-482
PDF size: 205.66 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Recently, bioethics and international relations have gotten closer to one another, probably as a result of the motivation of bioethics to intervene in global affairs. However, this relationship has only been on the practical level. This study’s objective, through a literature review, is to highlight the huge potential that the epistemologies of both areas have to build a more fruitful dialogue. 18 articles relating both areas were retrieved from databases Scopus, Web of Science, Bireme and PubMed. The articles were then grouped in three categories of analysis: bioethics and global health; international organizations and bioethics; and international relations and bioethics. This study concludes that an epistemological approaching between these areas is desirable and proposes the establishment of two new areas of study: international relations in health and international relations from the South, drawing upon the conceptual basis developed by Latin-American bioethics.


REFERENCES

  1. Naciones Unidas. Transformar nuestro mundo: la Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible, A/RES/70/1 [consultado el 15 de octubre de 2015]. Disponible en: http://www.un.org/es/comun/docs/?symbol=A/RES/70/1

  2. Naciones Unidas. Health in the post-2015 UN development agenda [consultado en mayo de 2012]. Disponible en: http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/ pdf/Think%20Pieces/8_health.pdf

  3. Salomón M. La teoría de las relaciones internacionales en los albores del siglo XXI diálogo, disidencia, aproximaciones. Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals 2002;56:9-10.

  4. Snyder J. One World, Rival Theories. Foreign Policy 2004;145:52-62. http://doi.org/bk3358

  5. Walt S. International Relations One World, Many Theories. Foreign Policy 1998;110(29):34-46. http://doi.org/cw9vk6

  6. Tickner A. Intervención por invitación. Claves de la política exterior colombiana y sus debilidades principales. Revista Colombia Internacional 2007; 65: 90-110.

  7. Kickbusch I. “Global Health Governance: Some Theoretical Considerations on the New Political Space.” In Health Impacts of Globalization: Towards Global Governance. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.

  8. Harman S. International Health Governance. International Relations. Oxford Bibliographies [consultado el 20 de septiembre de 2015]. Disponible en: http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/ obo-9780199743292/obo-9780199743292-0140.xmldoi 10.1093/ OBO/9780199743292-0140

  9. Potter V. Bioethics, the Science of Survival. University of Wisconsin. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 1970;14:127-153.

  10. Beecher H. Ethics and clinical research. N Engl J Med 1966;274:1354- 1360. http://doi.org/g4t

  11. Garrafa V, Machado M. Mudanças na Declaração de Helsinki: fundamentalismo econômico, imperialismo ético e controle social. Cad. Saúde Pública 2001;17(6):1489-1496. http://doi.org/ffgbst

  12. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7a ed. New York: Oxford, 2013.

  13. Loch, A. Princípios da Bioética. In Kipper DJ. (editor) Uma Introdução à Bioética. Temas de Pediatria Nestlé 2002;73:12-19.

  14. Garrafa V. Da bioética de princípios a uma bioética interventiva. Revista Bioética 2013;13(1):125-134.

  15. Garrafa V, Osório L. Epistemología de la bioética - enfoque latinoamericano. Revista Colombiana de Bioética 2009;4(1):73-92.

  16. Morin E. A religação dos saberes. En: Morin E. A Religação dos saberes. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil, 2001:487-567.

  17. Garrafa V. Multi-inter-transdisciplinaridade, complexidade e totalidade concreta em bioética. En: Garrafa V, Kottow M, Saada A (orgs.). Bases conceituais da bioética - enfoque latino-americano. São Paulo: Editora Gaia/Unesco, 2006:73-86.

  18. Kosik K. Dialética do concreto. 2 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1976:128.

  19. Sotolongo PL. O tema da complexidade no contexto da bioética. En: Garrafa V, Kottow M, Saada, A (orgs.). Bases conceituais da bioética - enfoque latino-americano. São Paulo: Editora Gaia/Unesco, 2006:93-113.

  20. Garrafa V, Kottow M, Saada A (orgs.). Bases conceituais da bioética -enfoque latino-americano. São Paulo: Editora Gaia/Unesco, 2006.

  21. Garrafa V, Cordón J. Determinantes sociais da doença. Saúde em Debate 2009;33(83):388-396

  22. Porto D, Garrafa V. A influência da Reforma Sanitária na construção das bioéticas brasileiras. Ciênc saúde coletiva 2011; 16 supl.1:719-729.

  23. Nussbaum M. Crear capacidades. Barcelona: Paidós, 2012.

  24. Santana J, Garrafa V. Cooperação em saúde na perspectiva bioética. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 2013;18(1):129-137. http://doi.org/bfq4

  25. Cunha TR. Bioética crítica, saúde global e a agenda do desenvolvimento (tesis). Brasilia: Universidade de Brasilia, 2014.

  26. Benatar S. The HIV AIDS Pandemic A Sign of Instability in a Complex Global System. J Med Philos 2002;27(2):163-177. http://doi.org/bcksgs

  27. Rennie S, Mupenda B. Living apart together reflections on bioethics, global inequality and social justice. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 2008;3(25):3-25. http://doi.org/bk9684

  28. Petersen A. From bioethics to a sociology of bio-knowledge. Soc Sci Med 2013;98:264-270.

  29. Benatar SR, Daar AS, Singer PA. Global Health Challenges The Need for an Expanded Discourse on Bioethics. PLoS Med 2005; 2(7): 3-7.

  30. van Niekerk A. Principles of global distributive justice moving beyond Rawls and Buchanan. S. Afr. J Philos 2004;23(2):52-60.

  31. Diniz D, Avelino D. International perspective on embryonic stem cell research. Rev. Saúde Pública 2009; 43(3):541-547. http://doi.org/b6qgqt

  32. Konrad M. International Biodiplomacy and Global Ethical Forms Relations of Critique Between Public. Anthropological Quarterly 2007;80(2):325-353.

  33. Sandor J. Human rights and bioethics Competitors orallies. The role of international law in shaping the contours of a new discipline. Med Law 2008;27:15-28.

  34. Sutton V. A Multidisciplinary Approach to an Ethic of Biodefense and Bioterrorism. The Journal of Law, Medicina and Ethics 2005;33(2):310-322.

  35. ten Have H, Anf TW. Unesco’s Global Ethics Observatory. J Med Ethics 2007;33:15-16. http://doi.org/bgfvwk

  36. Langlois A. Negotiating Bioethics the Governance of Unesco’s Bioethics Programme. London: Routledge, 2013.

  37. Langlois A. The Global Governance of Bioethics Negotiating UNESCO’s Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (2005). Glob Health Gov 2011;5(1):1-23.

  38. Manchola-Castillo C. Por una bioética distinta: narrativa y latinoamericana. Revista Redbioética/UNESCO 2014;2(10):70-80.

  39. Manchola-Castillo C, Brasão E, Pulschen A, Santos M. Cuidados paliativos, espiritualidade e bioética narrativa em unidade de saúde especializada. Rev Bioét 2016;24(1):165-175.

  40. Barton A. A narrative approach to bioethical decision making: The missing link between bioethics. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 2008; 25(4) 497-509.

  41. Maldonado C, Mezza-García N. Introduciendo la complejidad en la política y las relaciones internacionales. Bogotá: Editorial Universidad del Rosario, 2014.

  42. Nascimento W, Garrafa V. Por uma vida não colonizada. Saúde Soc 2011;20(2):287-299.

  43. Castro-Gómez S. La hybris del punto cero. Bogotá: Universidad Javeriana, 2005.

  44. Silva A. Bioética, governança y neocolonialismo: sugestões para a atuação diplomática brasilera (tesis). Brasilia: LIX Curso de Altos Estudios. Brasil: Instituto Rio Branco, Ministério das Relações Exteriores, 2014.

  45. Garrafa V, Lorenzo C. Moral imperialism and multi-centric clinical trials in peripheral countries. Cad Saúde Pública 2008;24(10):2219-2226. http:// doi.org/d4zrgh




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com