medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Archivos de Neurociencias

Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2014, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Arch Neurocien 2014; 19 (3)

Epidemiology of traumatic brain death in the National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery

González-Carrillo PL, Rivera-Durón E, Porcayo-Liborio S
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 129-135
PDF size: 1005.89 Kb.


Key words:

epidemiology, brain death, subarachnoid hemorrhage, donation.

ABSTRACT

The death determined by neurological criteria or brain death (BD) is best understood as a brain failure or end of a complete and irreversible neurological failure clinical expression. Objective: to determine the causes of ME in the Intensive Care Unit of the National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery in Mexico. Material and methods: a descriptive cross-sectional study the causes of ME in INNN were determined. Quantitative variables were expressed as means and qualitative variables as proportions. Descriptive statistical techniques were used. The information was processed on an excel database. We evaluated 157 patients with clinical evidence of ME. After excluding 98 because they did not meet inclusion criteria, the analysis of a sample of 59 individuals with ME. Results: 61% of the cases occurred in women. The mean age of the sample was 43.30 years (range 17-71 years). The most common cause of subarachnoid hemorrhage was ME, representing 55.93% of cases. The average effective donation during the period under review was 42.78%. Conclusion: an increase in the level of alert to the symptoms and signs that should guide the diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage is required because it is an entity for which it is possible to offer treatment to avoid death.


REFERENCES

  1. Teitelbaum J, Shemie SD. Neurologic determination of death. Neurol Clin 2011; 29: 787-99.

  2. De Tourtchaninoff M, Hantson P, Mahieu P, Guérit JM. Brain death diagnosis in misleading conditions. Q J Med 1999; 92:407-14.

  3. Castro Aldana M, Villagómez Or tiz AJ, Torres Pérez J, Her nández Her nández C, Her nández Silva S. Muer te encefálica. Rev Espec Méd-Quirúr 2008;13(2):78-87.

  4. Consejo de Salubridad General. Diagnóstico de muer te encefálica. México: Secretaría de Salud, 2011.

  5. Escobar A. Muerte encefálica: fisiopatología y neuropa-tología. Rev Mex Neuroci 2005;6(4):327-35.

  6. Widjicks EFM, Varelas PN, Gronseth GS, et al. Evidence-based guideline update: determining brain death in adults: Report of the quality standards subcommittee of the Ame-rican Academy of Neurology. Neurol 2010;74:1911-8.

  7. Combes JC, Chomel A, Ricolfi F, et al. Reliability of computed tomographic angiography in the diagnosis of brain death. Transplantation Proceedings 2007;39:16-20.

  8. Karantanas AH, Hadjigeorgiou GM, Paterakis K, et al. Contribution of MRI and MR angiography in early diagnosis of brain death. Eur Radiol 2002; 12:2710-6.

  9. Izquierdo Pretell G, Gastelo Velásquez G, Reto Otero N. Muerte encefálica: incidencia, causas y manejo en Trujillo. Bol Soc Peru Med Interna 2000;13(2):70-2.

  10. Wang MY, Wallace P, Gruen JP. Brain death documentation: analysis and issues. Neurosurgery 2002; 51: 731-6.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Arch Neurocien. 2014;19