medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Gaceta Médica de México

ISSN 0016-3813 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Gac Med Mex 2016; 152 (5)

Pérdida sanguínea por el peso de los textiles y su correlación con la hemoglobina posquirúrgica

Montes-Casillas YE, Zazueta-Medina MF
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 8
Page: 674-678
PDF size: 90.22 Kb.


Key words:

Gravimetry, Hematocrit, Hemoglobin, Surgical event.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine postsurgical hemoglobin levels and the correlation with trans-surgical textile weight. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study, including 120 patients who underwent gynecological surgery, was performed in the HGR 1 in Cd. Obregon Sonora, from June to July 2015; the account of textile weight blood loss estimation was carried out and subsequently became an association of hemoglobin levels in the postoperative period, performing the conversion of a gram to one milliliter. There was expected to be an association between blood loss with low levels of hemoglobin; for each lost 500 ml, the hemoglobin decreased by 1 g. Results: 120 patients were evaluated; the average age was 48.65 years. The surgical events were divided in abdominal in 76.67%, breast surgery 19.17%, and vaginal 9.17%. There was a decrease in hemoglobin of 0.74 mg/dl and hematocrit of 1.93%. We found significant association between blood loss and the decrease in hemoglobin with relative risk of 3.01 (95% CI: 1.69-5.36). Conclusions: The main conclusion of this study is to establish that a loss › 500 ml has a direct association with › 1.1 g postoperative hemoglobin decrease and hematocrit reduction › 6%.


REFERENCES

  1. Lyndon A, Miller S, Huwe V, et al. Blood loss: Cinical techniques for ongoing quantitative measurement. CMQCC obstetric hemorrhage care guidelines and compendium of best practice. [Internet]. Consultado el 1 marzo de 2015. Disponible en: https://www.cmqcc.org/resources/916/ download.

  2. Pacagnella RC, Souza JP, Durocher J, et al. A Systematic Review of the relationship between blood loss and clinical signs. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(3):e57594.

  3. Al Kadri HM, Al Anazi BK, Tamim HM. Visual estimation vs gravimetric measurement of postpartum bloodloss: a prospective cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;283(6):1207-13.

  4. De La Peña-Martinez A, Perez-Delgado R, Yepes-Barreto I, De La Peña-Martinez M. Is visual estimation useful in determining the extent por perioperative haemorrhage? A study of correlation among anesthetists of intermediate and high complexity hospitals in Cartagena, Colombia. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2014;42(4):247-54. [Internet] Consultado el 3 marzo de 2015. Disponible en: www.revcolanest.com

  5. Zuckerwise L, Pettker C, Illuzzi J, Raab C, Lipkind H. Use of a novel visual aid to improve estimation of obstetric bloodloss. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(5):982-6.

  6. Stahl DL, Groeben H, Kroepfl D, Gautam S, Eikermann M. Development and validation of a novel tool to estimate peri-operative blood loss. Anaesthesia. 2012;67(5):479-86.

  7. Schorn MN. Measurement of blood loss: review of the literatura. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2010;55(1):20-7.

  8. Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses. Quantification of Blood Loss: AWHONN Practice Brief Number 1. Estados Unidos: AWHONN; 2014. [Internet] Consultado el 2 de marzo de 2015. Disponible enhttp://www.AWHONN.org.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Gac Med Mex. 2016;152