medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Trasplantes

ISSN 2007-6800 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • Policies
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Traspl 2016; 5 (3)

Latin American survey on bioethics and transplant. STALyC - IV Bioethics Forum on Transplants

Baquero A, Alberú J, García-García G, Bengonchea M, Gautos A, Reyes-Acevedo R, Tanus R, Tanus E, Barragán-Sánchez A, Cantú-Quintanilla G
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 94-101
PDF size: 224.65 Kb.


Key words:

Renal transplant, bioethics, national records.

ABSTRACT

Background: Bioethic culture progresses in the different fields of medical and surgical practice. Objective: Evaluating the scope and progress of bioethics in countries of Sociedad de Trasplantes de América Latina y el Caribe (STALyC) (Latin America and Caribbean Transplant Society). Methodology: A poll was designed with sociodemographic data and about 20 questions on bioethics regarding transplants. The survey was electronically sent to members of STALyC in each country. Results: 42 respond questionaries were received, coming from 11 countries in Latin America (with a larger participation of Mexico, 28.5%; Argentina, 14.2% and Chile, 11.9%). 52% of respondents have a specialty in Nephrology, and 33% in Surgery. 100% of respondents considered as necessary a document to be signed by the physician and the patient explaining the type of surgical intervention to be performed, possible complications, alternative treatments and expected results. Also, 100% stated that this practice is usual in their countries. 90% said that information about treatment should be given to an autonomous patient, and to a relative if authorized by patient. 80% agrees that the physician can refuse to carry out a treatment on grounds of his/her right to conscientious objection. 52% of respondents did not have a formation on Bioethics at the school of medicine; however, 69% have been through some type of updating on bioethical subjects in the last 5 years, and 97% state that it is important that Bioethics has a space at transplant conventions. However, 84% think that participants in the convention do not attend to bioethical subjects because schedule conflicts with subjects that are more important for them. 84% tell that he/she knows about the existence of a Bioethics Committee at the institution where they he/she works. Also, variation and lack of knowledge prevail among respondents regarding the number of patients under dialysis in their country: there does not seem to be a reliable national record available to those involved in the health sector. The same is found about waiting list of patients for a kidney transplant. Conclusions: Bioethics is a field with growing relevance in transplant practice in Latin America and the Caribbean. Reliable national records are required, both for patients under renal replacement therapy and transplanted patients.


REFERENCES

  1. Mariñelarena MJ, Cote EL. Códigos de ética en medicina. Su transitar por la historia. Cirujano General. 2010; 32 (1): 49-52.

  2. Baquero A, Alberú J. Desafíos éticos en la práctica de trasplantes en América Latina: Documento de Aguascalientes. Nefrología. 2011; 31 (3): 275-285.

  3. Fermín GM. Aspectos éticos en trasplante de órganos. Cuadernos de Bioética. 2001; 2: 253-265.

  4. Morey MA, Rodríguez JA, Monfá BJ, Torquet EP, González AM, Sánchez CA. Ética y nefrología. Consensos de la Sociedad Española de Diálisis y Trasplante (SEDYT). Dial Traspl. 2006; 27 (3): 102-107.

  5. Velázquez MRF. De la ética a la técnica en trasplante renal. Rev Mex Urol. 2012; 72 (1): 1-2.

  6. Casas MM, Portes CA. Bioética y trasplantes electivos. Cir Plast. 2010; 20 (1): 43-48.

  7. Pérez PJA. Comité de Bioética. Revista Facultad de Ciencias Forenses y de la Salud. 2012; 8: 91-96.

  8. Gamboa BGA. Comités de Ética y Bioética: Una diferencia operativa. Persona y Bioética. 2003; 7 (18): .

  9. Valdez ME, Lifshitz GA, Medesigo MJ, Bedolla M. Comités de Ética Clínica en México. Rev Panam Salud Pública. 2008; 24 (2): 85-90.

  10. Aréchiga H. La bioética y la formación científi ca del médico. Gac Méd Méx. 2001; 137 (4): 375-386.

  11. León CFJ. Enseñar bioética: cómo transmitir conocimientos, actitudes y valores. Acta Bioethica. 2008; 14 (1): 11-18.

  12. Suárez OF, Díaz AE. La formación ética de los estudiantes de medicina: la brecha entre el currículo formal y el currículo oculto. Acta Bioethica. 2007; 13 (1): 107-113.

  13. García GM, Pinto CJA. La bioética en la medicina actual: una necesidad en la formación profesional. Rev Med Electrón. 2011; 33 (4): 456-462.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Traspl. 2016;5