medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Urología

Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2005, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2005; 65 (3)

Percutaneous renal surgery. Supracostal and subcostal path

Marquina SM, Avalos VM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 192-196
PDF size: 48.56 Kb.


Key words:

Ureteropyelic, nephrolithotripsy percutaneous, endopyelotomy percutaneous.

ABSTRACT

Introduction. Pecutaneous renal surgery has a role important in the treating the several pathologies like urolithiasis, stenosis of the union U/P and ureteral, upper tract collecting system tumors, diagnosis and derivation nephrostomy. Percutaneous renal surgery would be do for modern urologist and has to teach in the residence. The access the superior calyx gives a good vision at the rest of the calyxes and the union U/P, but the problem in the possible perforation of the pleura with the complications intrathoracic. Is a retrospective study that assessed the morbidity associated with supracostal and subcostal renal approaches. Material and methods. We review the records the patients with percutaneous renal surgery between April 1994 and August 2004. A total of 148 patients underwent percutaneous renal surgery: 129 patients by renal and ureteral calculi, 11 patients with stenosis U/P, five patients with stenosis ureteral and/or fistula urine and three patients with stenosis of the anastomosis ureteral with bladder in renal transplantation. In this study does not include the nephrostomy diagnosis or derivation because we did not have enough information. Results. Of 148 cases 95 patients had accesses subcostal, 41 had accesses supracostal and 12 had the two type accesses. The rate of the complications for accesses supracostal was of 20% and for subcostal was of 6.5% and overall percutaneous accesses was 11%. The complications include transfusions two cases, hydro and hemothorax two cases, sepsis and bacteremia seven cases, fistula nephropleural one case, emboli lung one case, neumothorax five cases. The eigth complications intrathoracic were associated with percutaneous accesses supracostal (15%). There were two deaths, one by lung embolus and the other by septic shock (1.3%). Conclusions. The percutaneous renal surgery is a excellent technique, it can resolve problems an the kidney and ureteral, in difficult cases like staghorn calculi, with low morbidity. The supracostal access sometimes is necessary to do it for when we have stenosis of the U/P union or complex calculi, even it is risk and we have intrathoracic complications, it is very important to do the diagnostic and treat them as soon is possible for avoid fatal consequents.


REFERENCES

  1. Fernstrom I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1976; 10: 257.

  2. Segura JW, Patterson DE, Le Roy AJ, et al. Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: review of 1,000 cases. J Urol 1985: 134: 1077.

  3. Preminger GM, Clayman RV, Hardeman SW, et al. Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy vs. open surgery for renal calculi. A comparative study. JAMA 1985; 254: 1054.

  4. Streem SB, Pontes EJ. Percutaneous management of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma. J Urol 1986; 135: 773.

  5. Streem SB. Percutaneous management of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma. Urol Clin North Am 1995; 22: 221.

  6. Wolf JS, Clayman RV. Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. What is its role in 1997? Urol Noth Am 1997; 24: 43.

  7. Newhouse JH, Pfister RC. Antegrade pyelography. In: Interventional Radiology. Anthanasoulis CA, Pfister RC, Greene RE (Ed.). Chapt. 34. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1982, p. 437.

  8. Segura JW. Endourology. J Urol 1984; 132: 1079.

  9. Brannen GE, Bush WH. Complications and morbidity of endourology. AUA Update Series 1985; 4(3).

  10. 10.LeRoy AJ, May GR, Bender CE, et al. Percutaneous Nephrostomy for stone removal. Radiology 1984: 151: 607.

  11. 11.Brannen GE, Bush WH, Correa RJ, et al. Kidney stone removal: percutaneous versus surgical lithotomy. J Urol 1985; 133: 6.

  12. 12.Picus D, Weyman PJ, Clayman RV, et al. Intercostal-space nephrostomy for percutaneous stone removal. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986; 147: 393.

  13. 13.Preminger GM, Schultz S, Clayman RV, et al. Cephalad renal movement during percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 1987; 137: 623.

  14. 14.Narasimham DL, Jacobsson B, Vijayan P, et al. Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy through an intercostals approach. Acta Radiology 1991; 32: 162.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Urol. 2005;65