medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Comunicación, Audiología, Otoneurología y Foniatría

ISSN 2007-6037 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de Difusión de la Asociación Mexicana de Comunicación, Audiología, Otoneurología y Foniatría, A.C.,
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 3

Next >>

Rev Mex AMCAOF 2016; 5 (3)

Evolution of the techniques for the study of the vibratory function of the vocal cords

Kume M, Ramírez GA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 77-82
PDF size: 652.53 Kb.


Key words:

No keywords

Text Extraction

No abstract.


REFERENCES

  1. Garcia M. Observations on the human voice. Proc R Soc Lond. 1855; 7: 397-410.

  2. The laryngoscope and laryngostroboscopic examination. Arch Laryngol Rhinol. 1895; 3: 1-16.

  3. Ford CN, Bless DM. Electrogotography en Phonosurgery. Assessment and surgical management of voice disorders. 1991. pp. 110-112.

  4. Mehta DD, Hillman RE. Current role of stroboscopy in laryngeal imaging. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012; 20 (6): 429-436.

  5. Mehta DD, Deliyski DD, Hillman RE. Why laryngeal stroboscopy really works: Clarifyng misconceptions surrounding Talbot´s law and the persistence of vision. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010; 53: 1263-1267.

  6. The Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers. SMPTE Standards. 2004.

  7. Hillman RE, Metha DD. The science of stroboscopic imaging. In: Kendall KA, Leonard RJ. Laryngeal evaluation: indirect laryngoscopy to high-speed digital imaging. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc; 2010. pp. 101-109.

  8. Kay Pentax. Instruction manual. Stroboscopic systems and components. Montvale, NJ. 2008.

  9. Schuster M, Lohscheller J, Kummer P, Eysholdt U, Hoppe U. Laser projection in high speed glotography for high precisión measurements of laryngeal dimensions and dynamics. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2005; 262: 477-481. (PubMed: 15942801)

  10. Nawka T, Konerding U. The interrrater reliability of stroboscopic evaluations. J Voice. 2012; 26 (6): 812.e1-10.

  11. Patel R, Dayley S, Bless D. Comparison of high speed digital imaging with stroboscopy for laryngeal imaging of glottal disorders. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008; 117: 413-424. (PubMed 18646437)

  12. Deliski D. Laryngeal high speed videoendoscopy in laryngeal evaluation. Kendall K, Leonard R. Chap 28, pp. 245-247.

  13. Svec J, Schutte HK. Kimographic imaging of laryngeal vibrations. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012; 20: 458-465.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex AMCAOF. 2016;5