2014, Number 1
<< Back
Rev Mex Invest Psic 2014; 6 (1)
Enabling effect in second order matching to sample
Tamayo J, Martínez DR
Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 97-108
PDF size: 173.01 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Linguistic modes are divided into reactive and active. The first
are observing, reading and listening, and the latter signalizing,
writing and speaking. The effect of contact with the reactive
modes is evaluated in situations involving active modes.
This effect may be to enable or interfere on learning. In order
to evaluate the effect of enabling in a second order matching
to sample procedure, 36 undergraduates were distributed in
nine experimental groups that varied in the combination
of reactive-active linguistic modes. No differences in results
were observed in the enabling from contact with the reactive
modes observing and reading, regardless of the associated
active mode. Differences occurred with listening reactive
mode. The findings are analyzed based on results from previous
studies and the proposed approach to linguistic modes.
REFERENCES
Fuentes, M. T. & Ribes, E. (2001). Un análisis funcional de la comprensión lectora como interacción conductual. Revista Latina de Pensamiento y Lenguaje, 9, 181-212.
Gallo, D., McDermott, K., Percer, J., & Roediger, H. (2001). Modality effects in false recall and false recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 27, 339-353. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.339
Gómez, A. D. & Ribes, E. (2008). Adquisición y transferencia de una discriminación condicional de primer orden en distintos modos del lenguaje. Acta Comportamentalia, 16, 183-209.
Irigoyen, J. J, Jiménez, M. Y., & Acuña, K. F. (2006). Aproxima ción a la pedagogía de la ciencia. En J. J. Irigoyen, M. Y. Jiménez., & K. F. Acuña (Eds.), Enseñanza, Aprendizaje y Evaluación. Una aproximación a la pedagogía de las ciencias (pp.13-44). Hermosillo, Sonora: Universidad de Sonora.
Moreno, R. & Mayer, R. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: the role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 358-368. doi: 10.1037/0022- 0663.91.2.358
Moreno, R. & Mayer, E. (2002). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 156-163. doi: 10.1037/0022- 0663.94.1.156
Penney, C. & Godsell, A. (1999). Unusual modality effects in less-skilled readers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25, 284-289. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.1.284
Quiroga, L. & Padilla, M.A. (En prensa). El concepto de modo lingüístico y su aplicación en los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje mediante las TIC’s. Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues, 6.
Ribes, E. (2007). Lenguaje aprendizaje y conocimiento. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 24, 7-14.
Ribes, E. & Torres, C. (2001). Un estudio comparativo de los entrenamientos de primer y segundo orden en igualación de la muestra. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 27, 385-401.
Rummer, R., Schweppe, J., Furstenberg, A., Scheiter, K., & Zindler, A. (2011). The perceptual basis of the modality effect in multimedia learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 159-173. doi: 10.1037/a0023588
Tamayo, J., Ribes., E., & Padilla, M. A. (2010). Análisis de la escritura como modalidad lingüística. Acta Comportamentalia, 18, 87-106.
Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). When two sensory modes are better than one. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 257-287. doi: 10.1037/1076- 898X.3.4.257
Full text