Rivas LR, Durón PR, Romero HS, Audifred SJ, Hernández DJA

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 194-200
PDF size: 338.88 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Background: Reproductive surgery preserves, enhances or restores fertility. The minimal access surgery offers many benefits in relation to open surgery. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery is a relatively new technique in the field of gynecological surgery.
Clinical case: A 30-year- old female patient, with primary infertility of five years of evolution in who uterine myomatosis of large elements was diagnosed and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery was indicated.
Conclusion: The advantages of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery are: lower blood loss, hospital stay and postoperative pain and faster reinstatement to normal activities, in addition to a promising reproductive outcome for the patient.

REFERENCES

1. Hurst BS, Matthews ML, Marshburn PB. Laparoscopic myomectomy for symptomatic uterine myomas. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1–23.

2. AAGL position statement: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in benign gynecology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20:2-9.

3. Sunkara SK, Khairy M, El-Toukhy T, Khalaf Y, Coomarasamy A. The effect of intramural fibroids without uterine cavity involvement on the outcome of IVF treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:418–429.

4. Alessandri F, Lijoi D, Mistrangelo E, Ferrero S, Ragni N. Randomized study of laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy for uterine myomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006;13:92–97.

5. Mais V, Ajossa S, Guerriero S, Mascia M, Solla E, Melis GB. Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174: 654–658.

6. Palomba S, Zupi E, Russo, et al. A multicenter randomized, controlled study comparing laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy: short-term outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:942–951.

7. Seracchioli R, Rossi S, Govoni F, et al. Fertility and obstetric outcome after laparoscopic myomectomy of large myomata: a randomized comparison with abdominal myomectomy. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2663–2668.

8. Jin C, Hu Y, Chen XC, et al. Laparoscopic versus open myomectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;145:14–21.

9. Lipskind ST, Gargiulo AR, MComputer-assisted laparoscopy in fertility preservation and reproductive surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jul-Aug ;20(4):435-45.

10. Tulandi T, Einarsson JI. The use of barbed suture for laparoscopic hysterectomy and myomectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Mar-Apr;21(2):210-6.

11. Seracchioli R, Manuzzi L, Vianello F, et al. Obstetric and delivery outcome of pregnancies achieved after laparoscopic myomectomy. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:159–165.

12. Sizzi O, Rossetti A, Malzoni M, et al. Italian multicenter study on complicationsof laparoscopic myomectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14:453–462

13. Parker WH, Einarsson J, Istre O, Dubuisson JB. Risk factors for uterine rupture after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17:551–554.

14. Spong CY, Landon MB, Gilbert S, et al. Risk of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome at term after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:801–807.

15. Pitter MC, Gargiulo AR, Bonaventura LM, Lehman JS, Srouji SS. Pregnancy outcomes following robot-assisted myomectomy. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:99–108.

16. Advincula AP, Song A, BurkeW, Reynolds RK. Preliminary experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004;11:511–518.

17. Escher-Walsh CJ, Capes TL. Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Myomectomy Is an Improvement Over Laparotomy in Women with a Limited Number of Myomas Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (2010) 17, 306–310

18. Berea MA, et al. Cost Analysis of Abdominal, Laparoscopic, and Robotic-Assisted Myomectomies Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (2012) 19, 52–57