Juárez MCL, Ponce RRE, Rodríguez LJL

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 65-75
PDF size: 239.99 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To assess family functioning through the Instrument for Clinical Classification of Functional Family Stadium (CCFamEF). Material and methods: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study. All the families that attended the Family Therapy service of the Gustavo A. Madero Clinic of the Institute of Social Security and Services of the Workers of the State of Mexico were studied during the period from March 1 to November 1, 2014. Results: Twenty families were studied. The average age of the members of the families was 27.70 years + 15.70. Sex: women 60% and men 40%. 17 families (85%) were in a non-normative crisis, the rest 3familias (15%) were in a regulatory crisis. Of the families that attended the Family Therapy service requesting a change in their way of life 15 (75%) had no real disposition to work on it. Of the 20 families that attended, we found equality in two of the proposed stages of classification, 4 families (20%) were found to have a primary dysfunction without change and therapeutic work, 4 families (20%) were classified As chaotic without change. Conclusions: It was found that all the families studied were found in dysfunctional stages, which can be explained because it is a concentration service for the open population. The CCFamEF is useful for making decisions in the practice of family therapy.

REFERENCES

1. Conceptos Básicos para el estudio de las familias. Archivos en Medicina familiar 2005; 7(1): 15-19.

2. Leibovich de Figueroa NB, Schmidt VI, et al. Ecoevaluación Psicológica del contexto familiar, aspectos teóricos y empíricos. RIDEP 2010; 2:157-161.

3. Montalvo RJ, Espinosa SMR, Pérez AA. Análisis del ciclo vital de la estructura familiar y sus principales problemas en algunas familias mexicanas. Alternativas en piscología 2013; 28: 73-91.

4. Moreno MJH, Chauta R., et al. Funcionalidad familiar, conductas externalizadas y rendimiento académico en adolescentes. Psychol 2012; 6 (1): 155-166.

5. Gómez E, Muñoz MM, Haz MA. Familias Multiproblemáticas y en Riesgo Social: Características e Intervención. PSYKHE 2007; 16(2):43-54

6. Palomar LJ. Funcionamiento familiar y Calidad de Vida. Tesis de doctorado en psicología. División de Estudios de posgrado UNAM 1998: 11-40.

7. Vanina S, Barreyro JP, Maglio AL. Escala de Evaluación del funcionamiento familiar FACES III ¿Modelo de dos o tres factores? Escritos de Psicología 2009; 3(2):30-36.

8. Rivera HML, Andrade PP. Escala de Evaluación de las Relaciones Intrafamiliares. Uaricha Revista de Psicología 2010; 14: 12-29.

9. Gómez CFJ, Irigoyen CA, Ponce RER. Selección y análisis de Instrumentos para la evaluación de la estructura y la funcionalidad familiar. Arch Med Fam 1999; 1(2):45-57.

10. Zicavo N, Palma C, Garrido G. Adaptación y validación del Faces-20-ESP: Re-conociendo el funcionamiento familiar. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud 2012; 10(1): 219-234.

11. Ponce Rosas ER, Gómez Clavelina FJ, Terán Trillo M, Irigoyen Coria AE y Landgrave Ibáñez S. Validez de constructo del cuestionario FACES III en español (México). Atención Primaria 2002; 30 (10): 624-630.