medigraphic.com
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública

2017, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

salud publica mex 2017; 59 (2)

Quality and compliance with Clinical Practice Guidelines of Chronic Noncommunicable Diseases in primary care

Poblano-Verástegui O, Vieyra-Romero WI, Galván-García ÁF, Fernández-Elorriaga M, Rodríguez-Martínez AI, Saturno-Hernández PJ

Language: Spanish
References: 39
Page: 165-175
PDF size: 280.53 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective. To assess the quality and compliance of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) applicable to chronic noncommunicable diseases (CNCD) in primary healthcare (CS), and views of staff on the barriers, facilitators and their use. Materials and methods. 18 valued CPG with AGREEII, 3 are selected to develop indicators and assess compliance using lot quality acceptance sample (LQAS, standard 75 / 95% threshold 40 / 75% respectively, α:0. 05, β:0. 10) on 5 CS. 70 professionals surveyed about knowledge and use of CPG. Results. Average quality of the CPG was 57.2%; low rating in domains: “Applicability” (‹25%), “Stakeholder involvement” (43.5%) and “Rigour of development” (55.0%). Compliance in CS ranges from 39 to 53.4%. Professionals show uneven knowledge of CPG; 44 to 45% (according to CPG), they declare that they are not used, they identify as main barriers the lack of training, and their difficult accessibility and management. Conclusions. The quality and implementation of evaluated CPG is deficient constituting an opportunity of improvement in health services.


REFERENCES

  1. Lohr MJ, ed. Clinical Practice Guidelines. Vol 68. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1990. https://doi.org/10.17226/1626

  2. Field MJ, Lohr MJ, eds. Guidelines for Clinical Practice. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1992. https://doi.org/10.17226/1863

  3. Bengoa R, Key P, Leatherman S, Massoud R, Saturno P. Quality of care. A process for making strategic choices in health systems. Ginebra: OMS, 2006.

  4. Medicine I. Setting priorities for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1995.

  5. Institute of Medicine. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington DC: Institute of Medicine of the National Academies Press, 2011.

  6. Saturno PJP, Gutierrez J, Armendariz D, Armenta N, Candia E, Contreras O, et al. Calidad del primer nivel de atención de los Servicios Estatales de Salud. Diagnóstico Estratégico de La Situación Actual. Cuernavaca, Morelos: INSP-BID, 2014.

  7. Comité Nacional de Guías de Práctica Clínica. Estrategia para la difusión e implantación de las Guías de Práctica Clínica en el Sistema Nacional de Salud. Comité Nacional de Guías de Práctica Clínica. México: Secretaría de Salud, 2012.

  8. ARAPAU y Asociados. Evaluación de la difusión e implementación de las Guías de Práctica Clínica. México, DF; 2012 [consultado el 30 de enero de 2015]. Disponible en: http://www.dged.salud.gob.mx/contenidos/dess/ descargas/estudios_especiales/GPC_IF.pdf

  9. ARAPAU y Asociados. Evaluación 2014 de la Estrategia de Implantación de Guías de Práctica Clínica. México, D.F.; 2014 [consultado el 11 de julio de 2015]. http://www.dged.salud.gob.mx/contenidos/dess/descargas/estudios_ especiales/GPC14_IF.pdf

  10. Gutiérrez-Alba G, González-Block MÁ, Reyes-Morales H. Desafíos en la implantación de guías de práctica clínica en instituciones públicas de México: estudio de casos múltiple. Salud Publica Mex 2015;57(6):547-554. http://dx.doi.org/10.21149/spm.v57i6.7644

  11. Secretaría de Salud. Programa de Acción Específico 2007-2012. Desarrollo de Guías de Práctica Clínica. México, DF: Secretaría de Salud, 2012.

  12. Alonso-Coello P, Irfan A, Solà I, Gich I, Delgado-Noguera M, Rigau D, et al. The quality of clinical practice guidelines over the last two decades: a systematic review of guideline appraisal studies. Qual Saf Health Care 2010;19(6):e58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2010.042077

  13. Francke AL, Smit MC, de Veer AJ, Mistiaen P. Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak 2008;8:38. http://dx.doi. org/10.1186/1472-6947-8-38

  14. Córdova-Villalobos JÁ, Barriguete-Meléndez JA, Lara-Esqueda A, Barquera S, Rosas-Peralta M, Hernández-Ávila M, et al. Las enfermedades crónicas no transmisibles en México: sinopsis epidemiológica y prevención integral. Salud Publica Mex 2008;50(5):419-427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ S0036-36342008000500015

  15. Hernández-Ávila M, Gutiérrez JPJ, Reynoso-Noverón N. Diabetes mellitus en México. El estado de la epidemia. Salud Publica Mex 2013;55:(Suppl 2): S129-S136. http://dx.doi.org/10.21149/spm.v55s2.5108

  16. Campos-Nonato I, Hernández-Barrera L, Rojas-Martínez R, Pedroza- Tobías A, Medina-García C, Barquera S. Hipertensión arterial: prevalencia, diagnóstico oportuno, control y tendencias en adultos mexicanos. Salud Publica Mex 2013;55:(Suppl 2): S144-S150. http://dx.doi.org/10.21149/spm. v55s2.5110

  17. Brouwers M, Kho ME, Browman GP, Cluzeau F, Feder G, Fervers B, et al. AGREE II: Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in healthcare. Can Med Assoc J 2010;182(18):E839-E842. https://doi. org/10.1503/cmaj.090449

  18. Guyatt G, Oxman A, Vist G, Kunz R, Falck-Yttery, Alonso-Coello P, et al. Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Br Med J 2008;336(7650):924-926. https://doi.org/10.1136/ bmj.39489.470347.AD

  19. Saturno PJ, Martínez-Nicolas I, Robles-Garcia IS, Lopez-Soriano F. Development and pilot test of a new set of good practice indicators for chronic cancer pain management. Eur J Pain 2004;(10):516.

  20. Landis J, Koch G, Landis JR, Landis J, Koch G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2529310

  21. Robertson SE, Valadez JJ. Global review of health care surveys using lot quality assurance sampling (LQAS), 1984-2004. Soc Sci Med 2006;63(6):1648-1660. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.04.011

  22. Harold F, Dodge HGR. Sampling Inspection Tables: Single and Double Sampling. 2nd Revise. Nueva York: John Wiley & Sons, 1998.

  23. Saturno P. The binomial distribution and the Lot Quality Acceptance Sampling as methods for monitoring quality in health services. Rev Calid Asist 2000;15(15):99-107.

  24. Saturno-Hernández P. Métodos y herramientas para la realización de ciclos de mejora de la calidad en servicios de salud. Cuernavaca, Morelos: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9781107415324.004

  25. Lemeshow S, Hosmer D, Klar J, Lwanga S. Lot Quality Assurance Sampling. En: Adequacy of Sample Size in Health Studies. Willshire: WHO/ John Wiley & Sons, 1992.

  26. Min-Woo Jo, Jin Yong Lee, Nam-Soon Kim, Soo-Young Kim, Seungsoo Sheen SHK. Assessment of the quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Korea using the AGREE Instrument. J Korean Med Sci 2013;(28):357-365.

  27. Delgado-Noguera MF, Merchán-Galvis ÁM, Mera-Mamián AY, Muñoz- Manquillo DM, Calvache JA. Evaluación de la calidad metodológica de las Guías Colombianas de Práctica Clínica en Pediatría. Pediatria (Santiago) 2015;(48):87-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcpe.2015.12.001

  28. Alba L, Murillo R, Castillo J. Intervenciones de consejería para la cesación de adicción al tabaco: revisión sistemática de la literatura. Salud Publica Mex 2013;55(2):196-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0036- 36342013000200012

  29. Pak KJ, Hu T, Fee C, Wang R, Smith M, Bazzano LA, et al. Acute hypertension: a systematic review and appraisal of guidelines. Ochsner J 2014;14(4):655-663.

  30. Holmer HK, Ogden LA, Burda BU, Norris SL. Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. PLos ONE 2013;8(4):1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058625

  31. Wang Y, Álvarez G, Salinas R, Ramírez G, Catalán M, Díaz C. Análisis del cumplimiento de la guía clínica del AUGE en pacientes con accidente cerebrovascular isquémico: La utilización de tecnología sanitaria de diagnóstico para prevención secundaria en un hospital público. Rev Med Chil 2011;139(6):697-703. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0034- 98872011000600001

  32. Iqbal MZ, Khan HA, Sulaiman SA, Iqbal MS, Hussain Z. Guideline for adherence and diabetes control in co-morbid conditions in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia. Trop J Pharm Res 2014;13(10):1739. http://dx.doi. org/10.4314/tjpr.v13i10.25

  33. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud P, et al. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999;282(15):1458-1465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/ jama.282.15.1458

  34. McCormack L, Sheridan S, Lewis M, Boudewyns V, Melvin C, Kistler C, et al. Communication and dissemination strategies to facilitate the use of health-related evidence. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2013.

  35. Kenefick H, Lee J, Fleishman V. Improving physician adherence to clinical practice guidelines barriers and strategies for change. New Engl Healthc Inst. 2008;55. Available from: http://www.nehi.net/writable/publication_ files/file/cpg_report_final.pdf

  36. Pantoja T, Valenzuela L, Léniz J CC, Pantoja T, Valenzuela L, Léniz J, Castañón C. Guías de Práctica Clínica en el Régimen de Garantías en Salud: una evaluación crítica de su calidad. Rev Med Chil 2012;140(140):1391-1400. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0034- 98872012001100003

  37. Constantino-Casas P, Medécigo-Micete C, Millán-Gámez YYK, Torres- Arreola LDPL, Valenzuela-Flores AA, Viniegra-Osorio A, et al. Survey on physicians’ knowledge and attitudes towards clinical practice guidelines at the Mexican Institute of Social Security. J Eval Clin Pract 2011;17(4):768- 774. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01710.x

  38. Casas D, Rodríguez A, Tapia E, Camacho E, Casas D, Rodríguez A, et al. Aptitud clínica en médicos familiares apegada a guías de práctica clínica. Rev Med e Investig 2014;2(2):100-106.

  39. Saturno, PJ, Palmer RHR, Gascon J. Physician attitudes, self-estimated performance and actual compliace with locally peer-defined quality evaluation criteria. Int J Qual Heal Care 1999;11(6):487-496. https://doi. org/10.1093/intqhc/11.6.487




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com