medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de Ciencias Médicas de Pinar del Río

ISSN 1561-3194 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Ciencias Médicas 2017; 21 (1)

Comparative test between Ag inactivated macro-agglutination and in vivo Ags agglutination in the diagnosis of leptospirosis

Cabezas AH, Fernández BY, Cabezas ML
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 54-61
PDF size: 277.39 Kb.


Key words:

leptospirosis, antigen, diagnosis.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: there are several methods for the serological diagnosis of leptospirosis but more research is needed to achieve an efficient, rapid and economical way that satisfies the diagnosis.
Objective: to evaluate polyvalent Ag for macroscopic diagnosis of leptospirosis versus micro-agglutination.
Method: a polyvalent Leptospira Ag and the dilution for sera were prepared at Leptospirosis Center of Pinar del Rio in the University of Medical Sciences, and tested with sera from patients arriving at the Provincial Laboratory of Microbiology; 430 sera, 260 of suspect and leptospirosis positive patients, 120 out of 10 family practices, 20 positive for brucellosis, 15 positive for syphilis and 15 hyper-immune sera were compared between macro and micro-agglutination sera. The sera were diluted 1:80, for macro-agglutination with their dilution and for 1: 100 micro-agglutination with saline solution.
Results: the results were processed by comparison of proportions with 95% of confidence interval, estimating sensitivity and specificity. Of the suspected sera, they were positive to micro-agglutination (2.63% and 3.21% to macro-agglutination), there was no non-significant difference. Positive to Brucellaand syphilis were negative to Leptospira and the positive hyper-immune, in general specificity and sensitivity of polyvalent Leptospira Ag was 99.73 and 99.95% with respect to 100% of micro-agglutination.
Conclusions: there was no significant difference between micro-agglutination and macro-agglutination (P ≥ 0.05). Both the specificity and sensitivity of AgLP were excellent. The trials must be extended to different population groups. The method is very valuable.


REFERENCES

  1. David A. Haake. HaakeD A, and Paul N. LevettLevettPN. Leptospirosis in humans. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol.[Internet]2015;2015 [Citado 7 de febrero de 2017];387: 65–97.387: [Aprox. 32p.].doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-45059-8_5Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25388133

  2. Coutinho Mariana L , MatsunagaJ , -Chieh Wang L , de la Peña Monctezuma A , Lewis M S , Babbitt T J, et al. Kinetics of Leptospira interrogans Infection in Hamsters after Intradermal and Subcutaneous Challenge. PLoSNeglTropDis. [Internet]2015;2014 [Citado 7 de febrero de 2017];8(11). Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25411782

  3. Fouts DE , Matthias MA , Adhikarla H , Adler B , Amorim-Santos L, et al. What Makes a Bacterial Species Pathogenic?: Comparative Genomic Analysis of the Genus Leptospira PLoSNeglTropDis [Internet] 2015;2016 Feb[Citado 7 de febrero de 2017];10(2). Disponible en: http://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0004403

  4. Wunder EA, Figueira CP , Santos GR, Lourdault K , Matthias MA, et al. Real-Time PCR Reveals Rapid Dissemination of Leptospira interrogans after Intraperitoneal and Conjunctival Inoculation of Hamsters. Infect Immun. [Internet] 2015;2016 Jul[Citado 7 de febrero de 2017]; 84(7): [Aprox. 10p.]. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27141082

  5. Narayanavari SA, Lourdault K , Sritharan M , Haake DA , Matsunaga J, Narayanavari SA. Role of sph2 Gene Regulation in Hemolytic and Sphingomyelinase Activities Produced by Leptospira interrogans. PLoSNeglTropDis. [Internet] 2015;2015 Ago [Citado 7 de febrero de 2017];9(8): [Aprox. 6p.]. Disponible en: http://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0003952

  6. Mohammadi E, Sakhaee E. Association between serum copper concentration and the riskof bovine leptospirosis. Comp ClinPathol. [Internet] 2015[Citado 7 de febrero de 2017]; 24(6): [Aprox. 3p.]. Disponible en: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00580-015-2069-0

  7. Martins G, Lilenbaum W. The panorama of animal leptospirosis in Rio deJaneiro, Brazil, regarding the sero epidemiology of the infection in tropical regions. Veterinary Research. [Internet] 2013[Citado 7 de febrero de 2017]; 9: [Aprox. 1p]. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24289165

  8. Hamond C, Pinna A, Martins G, Lilenbaum W. The role of leptospirosis in reproductive disorders in horses. Trop Anim Health Prod.[Internet] 2014[Citado 7 de febrero de 2017];46(1): [Aprox. 10p.]. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23990441

  9. Andre-Fontaine G, Aviat F. Waterborne Leptospirosis: Survival and Preservation of the Virulence of Pathogenic Leptospira spp. in Fresh Water. Curr Microbiol. [Internet] 2015 [Citado 7 de febrero de 2017];71(1): [Aprox. 6p.]. Disponible en: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00284-015-0836-4

  10. Taugamoa A, NiutouaI, Labrousse D, Gular R, Bogdanowicz W, Jundan H, Ciryli G. Leptospirosis risk increases with changes in species composition of rat populations. Naturwissenschaften. [Internet] 2013 [Citado 7 de febrero de 2017];100(4): [Aprox. 3p.]. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3617346/

  11. Pulido-Villamarín A, Carreño-BeltránG, Mercado-Reyes M, Ramírez-Bulla P. Situación epidemiológica de la leptospirosis humana en Centroamérica, Suramérica y el Caribe. Univ Sci. [Internet] 2014 [Citado 7 de febrero de 2017];19(3): [Aprox. 17p.]. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0122-74832014000300007&lng=es&nrm=iso

  12. Picardeau M. Diagnosis and epidemiology of leptospirosis. Méd Mal infect. [Internet] 2013 [Citado 7 de febrero de 2017];43(1): [Aprox. 8p.]. Disponible en: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0399077X12003198

  13. Khan MA, Islam S, Khan SA, Khan I, Shafie S, Gul T. Prevention of Leptospirosis infected vector and human population by multiple control variables. Int J Appl. [Internet] 2014 [Citado 7 de febrero de 2017]; (2014): [Aprox. 9p.]. Disponible en: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/aaa/2014/619035/

  14. Martins G, Lilenbaum W. Leptospirosis in sheep and goats under tropical conditions. Tropical Animal Health and Production. [Internet] 2014 [Citado 7 de febrero de 2017];46(1): [Aprox. 6p.]. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24085419

  15. Cortizo P, Loureiro AP, Martins G, do Rodrigues Patrícia R, Pego Faria B, Lilenbaum W, et al. Risk factors to incidental leptospirosis and its role on the reproduction of ewes and goats of Espírito Santo state, Brazil. Trop Anim Health Prod. [Internet] 2015 [Citado 7 de febrero de 2017];47(1): [Aprox. 4p.]. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25274622




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Ciencias Médicas. 2017;21