Juárez-Sandoval A, Ibarra-Tapia IY, Rojano-Mejía D

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 61-66
PDF size: 175.69 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: In Mexico, the spinal cord injury has an annual incidence of 18 per million inhabitants and occurs more frequently in men of 16-35 years of age. According to the Clinical Practice Guideline, the most effective method to avoid complications and improve the quality of life is to carry out a multidisciplinary educational program and online courses are a good option. Material and methods: Narrative review was carried out using three electronic databases from 2001 to 2016. Articles containing the following keywords were selected: «education-educational program», «spinal cord injury-paraplegia-tetraplegia», «quality of life» and «complications». Results: We selected nine articles from the literature review. Of these, one article is systematic review, one quasi-experimental article, one case-control article, two randomized controlled clinical trials, two cohort articles and two cross-sectional survey. Conclusion: A multidisciplinary educational program through web page and multimedia resources is an efficient, accessible and low cost tool for people with spinal cord injury as well as for their support network that guarantees greater learning and therefore reduces complications, length of stay and improves the quality of life.

REFERENCES

1. Lee BB, Cripps RA, Fitzharris M, Wing PC. The global map for traumatic spinal cord injury epidemiology: update 2011, global incidence rate. Spinal Cord. 2014; 52(2): 110-116.

2. Furlan JC, Sakakibara BM, Miller WC, Krassioukov AV. Global incidence and prevalence of traumatic spinal cord injury. Can J Neurol Sci. 2013; 40(4): 456-464.

3. Singh A, Tetreault L1, Kalsi-Ryan S1, Nouri A1, Fehlings MG. Global prevalence and incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury. Clin Epidemiol. 2014; 6: 309-331.

4. Estrada-Mondaca S, Carreón-Rodríguez A, Parra-Cid MC, Ibarra-Ponce de León C, Velasquillo-Martínez C, Vacanti CA y cols. Lesión de médula espinal y medicina regenerativa. Salud Pública Méx. 2007; 49(6): 437-444.

5. Secretaría de S. GPC Diagnóstico y Principios del Tratamiento Quirúrgico de las Fracturas de Vertebras Toraco-lumbares Secundarias Traumatismo en Adulto. México. 1-51.

6. K. GN. Education basics. [Internet]. First. New Delhi: Course; 2014. p. 3-5. Available from: http://www.ncert.nic.in/pdf_files/basic_in_education.pdf

7. Easley BD. Chapter 13 [Internet]. The Structure of the Web. 2010. p. 375-395. Available from: https://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/kleinber/networks-book/networks-book-ch13.pdf

8. Microsoft. Dictionary of IBM & computing terminology [Internet]. p. 1-95. Available from: https://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/documents/pdf/glossary.pdf

9. Van Wyk K, Backwell A, Townson A. A narrative literature review to direct spinal cord injury patient education programming. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015; 21(1): 49-60.

10. Chen HY, Wu TJ, Lin CC. Improving self-perception and self-efficacy in patients with spinal cord injury : the efficacy of DVD-based instructions. J Clin Nurs. 2015; 24(11-12): 1666-1675.

11. Rintala DH, Garber SL, Friedman JD, Holmes SA. Preventing recurrent pressure ulcers in veterans with spinal cord injury: impact of a structured education and follow-up intervention. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89: 1429-1441.

12. Phillips VL, Vesmarovich S, Hauber R, Wiggers E, Egner A. Telehealth: reaching out to newly injured spinal cord patients. Public Heal Rep. 2001; 116(Suppl 1): 94-102.

13. Colin D, Albert T, Gault D, Goossens D, Ste A, Ge A et al. Therapeutic education in persons with spinal cord injury : a review of the literature éducation thérapeutique après lésion médullaire: revue de la littérature. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2011; 54(3): 189-210.

14. Vk Noonan (Departament of Ortopedics, University of British Columbia, Vancuver, British Columbia C. Pub Med Central CANADA. Spinal Cord. 2014; 52(8): 578-587.

15. Shepherd JD, Badger-Brown KM, Legassic MS, Walia S, Wolfe DL. SCI-U: e-learning for patient education in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. J Spinal Cord Med. 2012; 35(5): 319-329.

16. Hoffman J, Salzman C, Garbaccio C, Burns SP, Crane D, Bombardier C. Use of on-demand video to provide patient education on spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2011; 34(4): 404-409.

17. Celik B, Ones K, Celik EC, Bugdayci DS, Paker N, Avci C et al. The effects of using the internet on the health-related quality of life in people with spinal cord injury: a controlled study. Spinal Cord. 2014; 52(5): 388-391.

18. Edwards L, Krassioukov A, Fehlings MG. Importance of access to research information among individuals with spinal cord injury : results of an evidenced-based questionnaire. Spinal Cord. 2002; 40(10): 529-535.

19. Burkell JA, Wolfe DL, Potter PJ, Jutai JW. Information needs and information sources of individuals living with spinal cord injury. Heal Info Libr J. 2006; 23(4): 257-265.

20. Matter B, Feinberg M, Schomer K, Harniss M, Brown P, Johnson K. Information needs of people with spinal cord injuries. J Spinal Cord Med. 2009; 32(5): 545-554.

21. Goodman N, Jette AM, Houlihan B, Williams S. Computer and internet use by persons after traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89: 1492-1498.

22. May L, Day R, Warren S. Evaluation of patient education in spinal cord injury rehabilitation: Knowledge, problem-solving and perceived importance. Disabil Rehabil. 2006; 28: 405-413.

23. AMIPCI. 12° Estudio sobre los Hábitos de los Usuarios de Internet en México 2016 [Internet]. INFOTEC. 2016. p. 1-20. Disponible en: https://www.amipci.org.mx/images/Estudio_Habitosdel_Usuario_2016.pdf

24. Bea-Muñoz M, Medina-Sánchez M, Flórez-García MT. Quality of websites with patient information about spinal cord injury in Spanish. Spinal Cord. 2016; 54(7): 540-545.

25. Rubinelli S, Collm A, Glässel A, Diesner F, Kinast J, Stucki G et al. Designing interactivity on consumer health websites: PARAFORUM for spinal cord injury. Patient Educ Couns. 2013; 93(3): 459-463.