medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirujano General

ISSN 2594-1518 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0099 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Cir Gen 2016; 38 (4)

Pancreaticogastrostomy as an alternative reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Initial experience in the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología México

Miranda-Dévora G, López-Basave HN, Montalvo-Esquivel G, León-Takahashi AM, Herrera-Gómez Á, Padilla-Rosciano AE
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/72780

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/72780
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/72780

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 192-198
PDF size: 373.78 Kb.


Key words:

Pancreatic cancer, reconstruction, Whipple, pancreaticogastrostomy.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Pancreatoduodenectomy reconstruction demands an extensive knowledge of anatomical and technical ability to obtain better outcomes. Pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) as an alternative reconstruction to decreased a pancreatic fistula and morbidity has been reported in different papers. Objective: Describe the initial experience with pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) reconstruction during the first thirty days post-surgery in the Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia Mexico. Material and methods: During the period from March 2014 to April 2015 a retrospective-observational study was conducted. Twelve patients reconstructed with PG electively by nine residents under the supervision of a senior oncological surgeon were studied. Results: Seven male (58.3%), five female (41.7%) underwent PG after a pancreaticoduodenectomy in 83.3% (N10) with pyloric preservation and 16.7% gastro-jejunal anastomosis by Y in Roux. Operating time was 501 min (420-610), average bleeding 611 ml (150-1,500 ml), general morbidity 41.7% (N5), one bile leakage (8.3%), mortality 0%, re-interventions 0%, rehospitalization 3 (25 %). Conclusions: Decreased pancreatic fistula following reconstruction PG, and reproducible procedure in young surgeons makes this type of reconstruction a therapeutic option during pancreatoduodenectomy.


REFERENCES

  1. Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, Belcher KA. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg. 2006; 244: 10-15.

  2. Egawa S, Toma H, Ohigashi H, Okusaka T. Japan pancreatic cancer registry, 30th Year Anniversary: Japan Pancreas Society. Pancreas. 2012; 41: 985-992.

  3. Adams DB. The pancreatic anastomosis: the danger of a leak, which anastomotic technique is better? J Gastrointest Surg. 2009; 13: 1182-1183.

  4. Lieberman MD, Kilburn H, Lindsey M, Brennan MF. Relation of perioperative deaths to hospital volume among patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy. Ann Surg. 1995; 222: 638-645.

  5. Derogar M, Blomberg J, Sadr-Azodi O. Hospital teaching status and volume related to mortality after pancreatic cancer surgery in a national cohort. Br J Surg. 2015; 102: 548-557.

  6. Gani F, Hundt J, Makary MA, Haider AH, Zogg CK, Pawlik TM. Financial impact of postoperative complication following hepato-pancreatico-biliary surgery for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015; 1064-1070.

  7. Grendar J, Ouellet JF, Sutherland FR, Bathe OF, Ball CG, Dixon E. In search of the best reconstructive technique after pancreaticoduodenectomy: pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy. Can J Surg. 2015; 58: 154-159.

  8. He T, Zhao Y, Chen Q, Wang X, Lin H, Han W. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Surg. 2013; 30: 56-69.

  9. Liu F-B, Chen J-M, Geng W, Xie S-X, Zhao Y-J, Yu L-Q, et al. Pancreaticogastrostomy is associated with significantly less pancreatic fistula than pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials. HPB (Oxford). 2015; 17: 123-130.

  10. Zhou Y, Yu J, Wu L, Li B. Meta-analysis of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy on occurrences of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Asian J Surg. 2015; 38: 155-160.

  11. Que W, Fang H, Yan B, Li J, Guo W, Zhai W, et al. Pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Surg. 2015; 209: 1074-1082.

  12. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM, Sauter PK, Zahurak ML, Talamini MA, et al. A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 1995; 222: 580-592.

  13. Farnell MB, Pearson RK, Sarr MG, DiMagno EP, Burgart LJ, Dahl TR, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Surgery. 2005; 138: 618-630.

  14. Fontes PR, Waechter FL, Nectoux M, Sampaio JA, Teixeira UF, Pereira-Lima L. Low mortality rate in 97 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies: the experience of a group. Arq Gastroenterol. 2014; 51: 29-33.

  15. Traverso LW, Longmire WP Jr. Preservation of the pylorus in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 1980; 192: 306-310.

  16. Whipple AO, Parsons WB, Mullins CR. Treatment of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Ann Surg. 1935; 102: 763-779.

  17. Mackie JA, Rhoads JE, Park CD. Pancreaticogastrostomy: a further evaluation. Ann Surg. 1975; 181: 541-545.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Gen. 2016;38