medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirujano General

ISSN 2594-1518 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0099 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Cir Gen 2016; 38 (4)

Hypotrophic, retrohepatic and intrahepatic gallbladder with aberrant right hepatic duct. A case report and literature review

Bizueto-Rosas H, Hernández-Altamirano I, Pérez-Reyna JD, Romero-López MA, Cruz-Sánchez N, Oropeza-Adame D
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/72785

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/72785
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/72785

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 207-212
PDF size: 304.61 Kb.


Key words:

Biliary tract, anatomical variants, accessory hepatic right duct, surgery.

ABSTRACT

The embryological complexity in the formation of the gallbladder and biliary tract are responsible for the frequent anatomical variants in more than 50% of the cases, the majority of which do not cause any pathology. In the anatomical variants, abnormalities in the right duct are the most frequent regarding biliary tract. The gallbladder diverticulum and accessory right hepatic duct entering the gallbladder are quite rare. We present the case of a male patient of 42 years with multiple episodes of biliary pain; in the last episode required urgent surgery and those anatomical variants were observed. Later on, an endoscopic retrograde transduodenal cholangiopancreatography demonstrated the integrity of the bile duct and absence of residual lithiasis. Therefore, we conclude that the intra-operative cholangiography should be routine for both discard lithiasis as to detect anatomical variations, because recognition of those impacts prognosis in the transoperative period, postoperative and the patient’s life. We present a review of the literature about these anomalies.


REFERENCES

  1. Aguirre-Olmedo I, Fernández-Castro E, González-Angulo JA, Cárdenas-Lailson LE, Beristain-Hernández JL. Variantes anatómicas de la vía biliar por colangiografía endoscópica. Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2011; 76: 330-338.

  2. Tolino MJ, Tartaglione AS, Sturletti CD, García MI. Anatomy variations of biliary tree. Surgical implicance. Int J Morphol. 2010; 28: 1235-1240.

  3. Rothman M. Anomalías de la vesícula y de las vías biliares y de sus vasos sanguíneos. En: Berk JE, editor. Bockus HL Gastroenterología. Tomo VI: Vías biliares y páncreas. 6ª ed. España: Salvat; 1987, p. 780-781.

  4. Boleko-Ribas MA. Estudio retrospectivo de las lesiones iatrogénicas de la vía biliar durante la era laparoscópica en un hospital de tercer nivel. [Tesis doctoral]. Barcelona: Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Servei de Cirurgia General i de l’ Aparell Digestiu; 2011.

  5. Pérez-Torres E, Espino-Cortés H, Bernal-Sahagún F. Vesícula biliar doble. Informe de un caso. Rev Med Hosp Gen Mex. 2004; 67: 94-97.

  6. Cueva-Pacheco A. Vesícula biliar. Departamento Académico de Cirugía, editores. Cirugía General I. [Libro en Internet]. Lima Perú. Disponible en: http://sisbib.unmsm.edu.pe/bibvirtual/libros/medicina/cirugía.

  7. Sinnatamby Ch S. Hígado y vías biliares. En: Last RJ. Anatomía de Last, regional y aplicada. 10a ed. Barcelona: Paidotribo; 2003, p. 259-60.

  8. Kurumi Y, Tani T, Hanasawa K, Kodama M. The prevention of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy from the point of view of anatomic variation. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2000; 10: 192-199.

  9. Ponsky JL. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1991; 161: 393-395.

  10. Raute M, Schaupp W. Iatrogenic bile duct injuries at cholecystectomy. Management and results. Langenbeck’s Arch Chir. 1988; 373: 345-354..

  11. Sackier JM, Berci G, Paz-Partlow M. Elective diagnostic laparoscopy. Am J Surg. 1991; 161: 326-331.

  12. Vergnaud J, Penagos S, Lopera C, Herrera A, Zerrate A, Vasquez J. Colecistectomia laparoscópica: experiencia en hospital de segundo nivel. Rev Colomb Cir. 2000; 15: 8-13.

  13. Mercado-Díaz MA, Ramírez-Morales R, Medinilla-Cruz MA, Sánchez Medal FP. Férula transhepática-transanastomótica en lesiones de las vías biliares. Evolución a largo plazo. Cir Ciruj. 2008; 76: 219-223.

  14. Matthews JB. Blumgart LH. Estenosis biliares benignas. En: Zinner MJ, Schwartz SI, Ellis H, editores. Vol II: Maingot. Operaciones Abdominales. 10ª. ed. Buenos Aires: Ed. Panamericana; 1998, pp. 1691-721.

  15. Melton GB, Lillemoe KD, The current management of postoperative bile duct strictures. Adv Surg. 2002; 36: 193-221.

  16. Menéndez A, Kleinfinger S, Vidal P, Ramírez C, Kunz W, González M. Riesgo-beneficio de la colangiografía transoperatoria de rutina. Rev Mex Cir Endoscop. 2004; 5: 99-103.

  17. Contreras-Sibaja E, Rendon-Dosal HD. Aspectos demográficos en lesión de vía biliar en un periodo de 8 meses en colecistectomía laparoscópica en el Hospital Central Militar. Rev Sanid Milit Mex. 2015; 69: 393-398.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Gen. 2016;38