medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Ginecología y Obstetricia de México

Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 11

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2016; 84 (11)

Vasa previa: diagnostic algorithm (cases series)

López-Ramón y Cajal C, Cordeiro-Vidal G, Valladares-Bajo Z, Cerviño-Gómez E
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 730-736
PDF size: 378.84 Kb.


Key words:

Vasa previa, Vasa previa/diagnosis, Diagnostic Techniques, Obstetrical and Gynecological, Prenatal diagnosis, Ultrasonography, Prenatal.

ABSTRACT

Objetive: We suggest an algorithm for an accurate and reproducible prenatal diagnosis of vasa previa.
Method: The diagnostic algorithm is based on placental morphology, its anatomical relationship with the low uterine segment and the type of cord insertion.
Results: We diagnosed 20 cases of vasa previa, 11 in singleton pregnancies and 9 in twins. The incidence detected was 1/1694 births. 10 cases were in vitro fertilization pregnancies. The average gestational age at the time of the ultrasound diagnosis was 25 weeks. 16 cases (80%) were classified as type I (velamentous insertion), 1 case (5%) as type II (bilobed placenta) and 3 cases (15%) as Twin type (velamentous cord insertion of second twin). The marginal or low insertion placenta was diagnosed in 7 cases (35%), and we found 3 bilobed placenta. All patients with the prenatal sonographic diagnosis of vasa previa were delivered by cesarean at a median gestational age of 35 weeks. All newborns were healthy.
Conclusion: This algorithm has let us easily diagnose vasa previa in our Hospital.


REFERENCES

  1. Oyelese Y, Catanzarite V, Prefumo F, Lashley S, Schachter M, Tovbin Y, Smulian JC. Vasa previa: the impact of prenatal diagnosis on outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103 (5 P1): 937-42.

  2. Oyelese Y, Smulian JC. Placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107(4): 927-41.

  3. Catanzarite V, Oyelese Y. Diagnosis and management of vasa previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun;214(6):764.

  4. Rebarber A, Dolin C, Fox NS, Klauser CK, Saltzman DH, Roman AS. Natural History of vasa previa Across Gestation Using a Screening Protocol. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33(1):141-147.

  5. Swank ML, Garite TJ, Maurel K, Das A, Perlow JH, Combs CA, et al. Vasa previa: diagnosis and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;215(2):223.e1-6.

  6. Bruner JP, Anderson TL, Rosemond RL. Placental pathophysiology of the twin oligohydramnios-polyhydramnios sequence and the twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Placenta 1998; 19 (1): 81-6.

  7. Hubinont C, Lewi L, Bernard P, Marbaix E, Debiève F, Jauniaux E. Anomalies of the placenta and umbilical cord in twin gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;213(4 Suppl):S91–102.

  8. Nelson LH, Melone PJ, King M. Diagnosis of vasa previa with transvaginal and color flow Doppler ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76 (3 Pt 2): 506-9.

  9. Oyelese Y, Chavez MR, Yeo L, Giannina G, Kontopoulos EV, Smulian JC, Scorza WE. Three-dimensional sonographic diagnosis of vasa previa. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24(2): 211–15.

  10. Ioannou C, Wayne C. Diagnosis and management of vasa previa: a questionnaire survey. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35 (2): 205-9.

  11. Zahumensky J, Gojis O, Kiss I, Kucera E. Velamentous insertion of the umbilical cord of twin B as a cause of vasa previa in monochorionic diamniotic twins. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2013; 122 (3): 261-2.

  12. López Ramón y Cajal CN. Diagnóstico prenatal de vasa previa. Prog Obstet Ginecol 2001; 44 (11): 505-11.

  13. Van Steenis A, Zhao DP, Steggerda SJ, Kist WJ, Haak MC, Oepkes D, et al. Double fatal outcome after ruptured vasa previa in monochorionic twins: case report and review of the literature. J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med Off J Eur Assoc Perinat Med Fed Asia Ocean Perinat Soc Int Soc Perinat Obstet. 2016 Aug;29(15):2522–5.

  14. Vintzileos AM, Ananth CV, Smulian JC. Using ultrasound in the clinical management of placental implantation abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;213(4, Supplement):S70–7.

  15. Gagnon R, Morin L, Bly S, Butt K, Cargil YM, Denis N, Hietala-Coyle MA, Lim KI, Ouellet A, Racicot MH, Salem S, Hudon L, Basso M, Bos H, Delisle MF, Farine D, Grabowska K, Menticoglou S, Mundle W, Murphy-Kaulbeck L, Ouellet A, Pressey T, Roggensack A. Guidelines for the Management of vasa previa. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2010; 108 (1): 85-9.

  16. Cai LY, Izumi SI, Koido S, Uchida N, Suzuki T, Matsubayashi H, Sugi T, , Kikuchi K, Yoshikata K. Abnormal placental cord insertion may induce intrauterine growth restriction in IVF-twin pregnancies. Hum Reprod 2006; 21(5): 1285-90.

  17. Victoria A, Mora G, Arias F. Perinatal outcome, placental pathology, and severity of discordance in monochorionic and dichorionic twins. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97(2): 310-5.

  18. Kent EM, Breathnach FM, Gillan JE, McAuliffe FM, Geary MP, Daly S, Malone FD. Placental cord insertion and birthweight discordance in twin pregnancies: results of the national prospective ESPRiT Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205(4): 376.e1-7.

  19. Allahdin S, Voigt S, Htwe, TT. Management of placenta praevia and accreta. J Obstet Gynaecol 2011; 31(1): 1-6.

  20. Vahanian SA, Lavery JA, Ananth CV, Vintzileos A. Placental implantation abnormalities and risk of preterm delivery: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;213(4, Supplement):S78–90.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2016;84