medigraphic.com
ISSN 8541-3697 (Print)

2017, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

AbanicoVet 2017; 7 (3)

Bacillus subtilis as a probiotic in poultry farming: relevant aspects in recent research

Medina-Saavedra T, Arroyo-Figueroa G, Herrera-Méndez C, Mexicano-Santoyo L

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page: 14-20
PDF size: 516.17 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The present article is a compilation of papers that show the use of probiotics as an alternative to the use of antibiotics as growth promoters. The benefits of Basillus subtilis had been found in a wide variety of environments and their use as a probiotic has been extensively studied. It has been shown that B. subtilis as a probiotic is of safe use in the feeding broiler without negative effects on the environment. Others of the relevant characteristics of B. subtilis are their action on the stability of the intestinal microbial by reducing the presence of E. coli, Salmonella, and Coccidia, favoring the increase of beneficial microorganisms and improving immunity by increasing IgA and IgG. Recent research has shown that B. subtilis contributes to the reduction of levels of ammonia in excreta, the production of antioxidant substances and the increase of digestibility because of the equilibrium of the intestinal ecology of birds, it has also been found that xylanases producing B. subtilis have a similar effect to antibiotics in the small intestine. Knowing the B, subtilis as probiotic represents to improve productive parameters and sanitary conditions of the birds.


REFERENCES

  1. GONZÁLEZ GB. 2009. Bacillus subtilis se considera seguro para pollos de engorde, para el consumidor y para el medio ambiente. Recuperado el 05 de febrero de 2017, de Albéitar Portal Veterinaria: http://albeitar.portalveterinaria.com/noticia/6945/actualidad/ bacillus-subtilis-seconsidera- seguro-para-pollos-de-engorde-para-el-consumidor-y-para-el-medioambiente. html

  2. BAI K, Huang Q, Zhang J, Fields G, Zhang L, Wang T. 2016. Supplemental effects of probiotic Bacillus subtilis fmbJ on growth performance, antioxidant capacity, and meat quality of broiler chickens. Poultry Science; 96 (1): 74-82. doi: 10.3382 / ps / pew246.

  3. FERNÁNDEZ H, Morales M, Amela M, Salerno C, Rodríguez GH, Arenaz F, Zamponi A. 2014. Efectos de la adición de probiótico (Bacillus subtilis) y omega 3 (Salvia hispanica L.) sobre los parámetros sanguíneos en pollos parrilleros. Rev. Agron. Noroeste Argent. 34 (2): 113-116. ISSN 2314-369X

  4. FORTE C, Acuti G, Manuali E, Casagrande PP, Pavone S, Trabalza MM, Franciosini, M. 2016. Effects of two different probiotics on microflora, morphology, and morphometry of gut in organic laying hens. Poultry Science. 95 (11):2528-2535. DOI: 10.3382 / ps / pew164

  5. GIBSON G, Roberfroid M. 1995. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics. Journal Nutriology. 125 (6): 1401-1412.

  6. GOROCICA RP, Chávez SR, Lascurain LR, Espinosa MB, Zenteno, GE. 1999. Óxido nítrico, una molécula multifuncional. Rev Inst Nal Enf Resp Mex. 12 (4): 300-304. http://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/iner/in-1999/in994i.pdf

  7. GRETHEL M, Pérez, M, Bocourt, R. 2008. Empleo de probióticos basado en Bacillus sp y de sus endosporas en la producción avícola. Revista Cubana de Ciencia Agrícola 42, (2): 117-122. ISSN: 0034-7485

  8. GUEVARA J. 2011. Probióticos en nutrición animal. Sistema de Revisiones en Investigación (SIRIVS); 1-10. veterinaria.unmsm.edu.pe/files/Articulo_guevara_probioticos.pdf

  9. GUO J, Dong X, Liu S, Tong J. 2016. Effects of long-term Bacillus subtilis CGMCC 1.921 supplementation on performance, egg quality, and fecal and cecal microbiota of laying hens. Poultry Science. pew389. doi: 10.3382 / ps / pew389.

  10. KUIPERS O, Konigs W, Kok, J. 2000. Lactic acid bacteria: the bug of the new millennium. Curr Opin Microbiol; 3: 276–282. PMID: 10851157

  11. KYUNG-WOO L, Hyun, SL, Seung J, Guangxing L, Sung-Hyen L, Erik P, Lillehoj P, Gregory R. 2010. Effect of Bacillus-based direct-fed microbials on Eimeria maxima infection in broiler chickens. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 33(6):105-110. DOI:10.1016 / j.cimid.2010.06.001

  12. LEE K, Li G, Lillehoj H, Jang S, Lee S, Babu U, Siragusa G. 2011. Bacillus subtilisbased direct-fed microbials augment macrophage function in broiler chickens. Research in Veterinary Science.91(3):87–91 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.01.018.

  13. MANAFI M, Khalaji S, Hedayati M, Pirany N. 2016. Efficacy of Bacillus subtilis and bacitracin methylene disalicylate on growth performance, digestibility, blood metabolites, immunity, and intestinal microbiota after intramuscular inoculation with Escherichia coli in broilers. Poultry Science. 2016 oct 6. doi: 10.3382 / ps / pew347.

  14. NEWMAN R, Bryden W, Fleck, E, Ashes J, Buttermer W, Storlien L, Downing J. 2002. Dietary n-3 and n-6 fatty acids alter avian metabolism: metabolism and abdominal fat deposition. British Journal of Nutrition. 88:11-18. DOI:10.1079 / BJNBJN2002580

  15. POZO D, Bitzer QO, Osuna C, García PA, Calv JM, Ortíz, GG, Guerrero JM. 1998. Producción de óxido nítrico y su modulación en el sistema inmune y el sistema nervioso. Arch Neurocien Mex. 3(2):84-94. http://www.imbiomed.com.mx/1/1/articulos.php?method=showDetail&id_articulo=455 2&id_seccion=21&id_ejemplar=508&id_revista=5

  16. SALEH H. Rahimi S. Karimi TM. 2009. The effect of diet that contained fish oil on performance, serum parameters, the immune system and the fatty acid composition of meat in broilers. International Journal of Veterinary Research; 3(2):69-75. https://ijvm.ut.ac.ir/pdf_20629_72a27f818938aeabcd81dc592662e03e.html

  17. SHARMA NK, Choct M, Dunlop MW, Wu SB., Castada HZ, & Swick, R. A. 2016. Characterisation and quantification of changes in odorants from litter headspace of meat chickens fed diets varying in protein levels and additives. Poultry Science, 96(4):851-860. DOI: 10.3382 / PS / PEW309.

  18. VANDEPLAS S, Bodin JC. 2012. Acción de una xilanasa producida por Basilus subtilis. Efectos sobre la flora intestinal y el estado sanitario de las aves. Selecciones Avícolas, noviembre. Noviembre 2012: 19-22. ISSN 0210-0541

  19. ZHANG ZF, Cho JH, Kim I. 2013. Effects of Bacillus subtilis UBT-MO2 on growth performance, immune organ relative weight, fecal gas concentration and intestinal microbial shedding in broiler chickens. Livest. Sci. 155:343 – 347. DOI: 10.1016 / j.livsci.2013.05.021.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com