Caycho-Rodríguez T

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 291-294
PDF size: 304.21 Kb.

Text Extraction

No abstract.

REFERENCES

1. Campo-Arias A, Oviedo HC. Propiedades psicométricas de una escala: la consistencia interna. Rev Salud Pública. 2008; 10(5): 831-839.

2. Aguilar-Navarro HJ, Coronado-Castilleja A, Gómez-Hernández OJ, Cobos-Aguilar H. Adaptación de laIowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale en poblaciónmexicana. Acta Pediatr Mex. 2016;37(3):149-158.

3. Cronbach LJ. My current thoughts on coefficient Alpha and successor procedures. Educ Psychol Meas. 2004; 64(3): 391-418.

4. Gadermann AM, Guhn M, Zumbo B D. Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert‐type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2012; 17(3): 1‐13.

5. Domínguez-Lara S.A. Secretos del coeficiente alfa. Actas Urol Esp. 2016; 40(7): 471.

6. Fan X, Thompson B. Confidence intervals about score reliability coefficients, please: an EPM guide lines editorial. Educ Psychol Meas. 2001; 61: 517-531.

7. Domínguez-Lara SA, Merino-Soto M. ¿Por qué es importante reportar los intervalos de confianza del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach? Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud. 2015; 13(2): 1326-1328.

8. Fisher R. Statistical methods for research workers. Edinburgh: Oliver &Boyd; 1950.

9. Romano JL, Kromrey JD, Hibbard ST. A Monte Carlo study of eight confidence interval methods for coefficient alpha. Educ Psychol Meas. 2010; 70(3): 376-393.

10. 1Romano JL, Kromrey JD, Owens CM, Scott HM. Confidence interval methods for coefficient alpha on the basis of discrete, ordinal response items: Whichone, ifany, is the best? The Journal of Experimental Education. 2011; 79(4): 382-403.