medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Ginecología y Obstetricia de México

Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 08

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2017; 85 (08)

Vulgar pemphigus: Difficulty in diagnosis of a infrequent vulvar dermatoses. A case report

José-Gutiérrez Y, Borque-Ibañez A, Baquedano-Mainar L, Del Agua-Arias C, Ruiz-Conde MÁ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 541-546
PDF size: 200.56 Kb.


Key words:

Vulva, Vulvar dermatoses, Pemphigus vulgaris.

ABSTRACT

Background: The skin diseases of the vulva are a frequent reason for consultation with both gynecologists and dermatologists. The clinical symptoms are usually vague as pruritus or stinging and patients usually consult later.
Objetive: To document a case of vulgaris vulvar pemphigus, and review the incidence, clinical presentation, diagnostic strategies and treatment.
Clinic case: An 86-year-old patient who came to medical service for ulcerated and burning vulvar lesions of two months of progression. A biopsy was obtained for the histological study, which resulted in acantholysis and suprabasal intraepidermal vesicle, without evidence of dyskeratosis or necrosis. We prescribe topical and oral corticosteroids during a month. Posteriorly, a control study was performed of the most recent lesion that evidenced lymphoplasmacytic inflammatory infiltrate with eosinophilic isolates, without epithelial permeation. Direct immunofluorescence test reported intercellular deposits, IgG throughout the thickness of the epidermis, and C3 in the suprabasal stratum, thus confirming the diagnosis of pemphigus vulgaris.
Conclusions: For correct diagnosis it is essential the clinic-pathological correlation, because many of these diseases manifest themselves almost identically.


REFERENCES

  1. Lynch M, Moyal-Barracco F, BogliattoL, Micheletti J. Scurry. 2006 ISSVD classification of vulvar dermatoses: pathologic subsets and their clinical correlates. J Reprod Med 2007;52:3-9.

  2. Barchino-Ortiz L, Suárez-Fernández R, Lázaro Ochaita P. Dermatosis inflamatorias vulvares. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2012;103(4):260-75.

  3. Wolff K, Goldsmith L, Katz S, Gilchrest B, Paller A, Leffell D. Fitzpatrick,s Dermatology in general medicine. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008;210-215.

  4. Koch PJ, Walsh MJ, Schmelz M, Goldschmidt MD, Zimbelmann R, Franke WW. Identification of desmoglein, a constitutive desmosomal glycoprotein, as a member of the cadherin family of cell adhesion molecules. Eur J Cell Biol. 1990;53(1):1-12.

  5. Suárez-Fernández R, España-Alonso A, Herrero-Gonzalez JE, Mascaró-Galy JM. Manejo práctico de las enfermedades ampollosas autoinmunes más frecuentes. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2008;99:441-455.

  6. Schlosser G, Mirowski W. Approach to the patient with vulvovaginal complaints. Dermatol Ther 2010;23:438- 448.

  7. Castellanos Íñiguez AA, Guevara Gutiérrez E. Dermatología Rev Mex 2011;55(2):73-83.

  8. Kavala M, Topaloğlu-Demir F, Zindanci I, Can B, Turkoğlu Z, et al. Genital involvement in pemphigus vulgaris (PV): Correlation with clinical and cervicovaginal Pap smear findings. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015;73(4):655-9.

  9. Mutasim DF, Adams BA. Immunofluorescence in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;45:803-822.

  10. Martin LK, Werth V, Villanueva E, Segall J, Murrell D. Intervenciones para el pénfigo vulgar y el pénfigo foliáceo. Massachusetts Uptodate Waltham. Dirección URL: (Consulta: junio 2016).




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2017;85