medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Ginecología y Obstetricia de México

Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 09

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2017; 85 (09)

Differences between concentrations of angiogenic factors in preeclampsia and gestational hypertension and their relationship with adverse maternal and perinatal outcome

Romero-Arauz JF, Álvarez-Jiménez MG, Encalada-Mijangos A, Pérez-Valdés MC, Chan-Verdugo RG, Leaños-Miranda A
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 561-568
PDF size: 304.49 Kb.


Key words:

Preeclampsia, Angiogenic factors, Adverse outcome.

ABSTRACT

Background: Preeclampsia is a major cause of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. The loss of the balance between pro-angiogenic and antiangiogenic factors precedes the clinical presentation of preeclampsia. This alteration is greater in early and severe forms of the disease and shows association to adverse perinatal outcome.
Objetive: To determine the relationship between serum concentrations of angiogenic factors and the severity of preeclampsia and gestational hypertension with the maternal and perinatal outcome.
Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional comparative study from September 2013 to August 2015 was performed in the Hospital of Gynecology and Obstetrics No. 4 IMSS Luis Castelazo Ayala. A total of 196 patients were analyzed including singleton pregnancies ≥ 20 weeks’ gestation diagnosed with preeclampsia and gestational hypertension. The patients were divided in five groups: mild gestational hypertension (n = 46), mild preeclampsia (n = 20), severe gestational hypertension (n = 19), severe preeclampsia (n = 89), and severe complicated preeclampsia (n = 22). Additionally the total patients were divided in two groups: with and without adverse maternal outcome and the second group with and without adverse perinatal outcome. The serum concentration of sFlt-1, PlGF and the respective sFlt1/PLGF ratio were determinate with electrochemiluminescence. The management and timing of the termination of pregnancy was performed based on established guidelines for clinical practice.
Results: The serum concentration of sFlt-1, PlGF and the respective sFlt1/PLGF ratio were significant different between the 5 groups analyzed (p ‹ 0.001). Moreover, the difference of the concentrations of angiogenic factors are closely associated with the severity of hypertensive disease of pregnancy (p ‹ 0.001). The sFlt1/PLGF ratio was higher in those with adverse maternal and fetal outcomes compared to those who did not had (222.5 vs 112.8 and 158.3 vs 53.1 respectively) p ‹ 0.001.
Conclusion: Major alteration was observed in the concentration of angiogenic factors as the greater the severity of hypertensive disease in pregnancy. Likewise, the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio was higher in those with adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes compared to those who did not have. Therefore this relationship has potential use as a biochemical marker of severity and risk stratification.


REFERENCES

  1. Zeisler H, Llurba E, Chantraine F, Vatish M, et al. Predictive value of the sFLT-1: PIGF ratio in women with suspected preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:13-22.

  2. Sibai BM, Dekker G, Kupferminc M. Preeclampsia. Lancet 2005; 365:785-99.

  3. Rana S, Karumanchi A, Lindheimer M. Angiogenic factor in diagnosis, management and research in preeclampsia. Hypertension 2014; 63:198-202.

  4. Zhang J, Klebanoff MA, Roberts JM. Prediction of adverse outcomes by common definitions of hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97:261.67.

  5. Fisher KA, Luger A, Spargo BH, Lindheimer M. Hypertension in Pregnancy: clinical-pathological correlations and remote prognosis. Medicine 1981, 60:267-76.

  6. Llurba E, Crispi F, Verlohren S. Update on the pathophysiological implications and clinical role of angiogenic factors in pregnancy. Fetal Diagn Ther 2015; 37:81-92.

  7. Verlohren S, Herraiz I, Lapaire O, et al. New gestational phase-specific cutoff values for the uses of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1/ placental growth factor ratio as a diagnostic test for preeclampsia. Hypertension 2014; 63:346-52.

  8. Romero JF, García M, Morales E. Guía de práctica clínica Preeclampsia-Eclampsia. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2012; 50(5):565-79.

  9. Romero JF, Ortiz CJ, Leaños A. Evolución de hipertensión gestacional a preeclampsia. Ginecol Obstet Mex, 2014; 82:229-35.

  10. Malshe AK, Sibai BM. Angiogenic and antiangiogenic makers for prediction and risk classification of preeclampsia. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2017; 60:134-40.

  11. Leaños A, Mendez F, Ramirez K, Serrano M, et al. Circulating angiogenic factors are related to the severity of gestational hypertension and their adverse outcomes. Medicine 2017; 96:4.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2017;85