medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirujano General

ISSN 2594-1518 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0099 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Cir Gen 2017; 39 (1)

Usefulness of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in patients with bile duct injury

Viteri-Cevallos DF
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/74558

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/74558
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/74558

Language: Spanish
References: 32
Page: 19-25
PDF size: 219.78 Kb.


Key words:

Bile duct injury, cholangiopancreatography, magnetic resonance.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Benign biliary strictures include several clinical entities; the most important group is for those who had a postoperative bile duct injury (BDI), the incidence of which has risen from 0.1-0.2% to 0.4-0.7% from laparoscopic cholecystectomy, although the incidence is similar to that of open surgery in the hands of expert surgeons. Within the diagnostic, MRCP has proven to be comparable with ERCP in the location and extent of extrahepatic LVB, with a sensitivity of 91 to 100%. Material and methods: A retrospective correlation was performed in the Gastrosurgery Service of HE Siglo XXI. The correlation (Cohen’s kappa) between the MRCP with surgical findings in patients undergoing LVB was observed, as well as its validation as a diagnostic tool. Results: Forty patients were included in this study. It was found that the overall correlation for the presence of BDI was 0.55; the one identified in relation to the anatomical level of the LVB was 0.59; to determine whether the BDI was complete or partial, kappa was of 0.39, and for the presence of intraabdominal collections, 0.59 (0.32 to 0.86). Regarding the diagnostic accuracy, it was found that to determine globally the presence of a BDI, the sensitivity (S) was 88.9% and the specificity (Sp) of 80%; to determine the level of preoperative lesion, S was 84% and Sp 26%. Conclusions: We conclude that there is a moderate correlation between MRCP diagnostic and surgical findings in patients undergoing surgery for bile duct injury.


REFERENCES

  1. Parikh P, Lillemoe K. Choledochal cyst and bening biliary strictures. In: Zinner M, ed. Maingot’s abdominal operations. 12th ed. Chicago: McGraw- Hill; 2013. pp. 1029-1059.

  2. Krokidis M, Orgera G, Rossi M, Matteoli M, Hatzidakis A. Interventional radiology in the management of benign biliary stenoses, biliary leaks and fistulas: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging. 2013; 4: 77-84.

  3. Judah JR, Draganov PV. Endoscopic therapy of benign biliary strictures. World J Gastroenterol. 2007; 13: 3531-3539.

  4. Wu YV, Linehan DC. Bile duct injuries in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surg Clin North Am. 2010; 90: 787-802.

  5. Lillemoe KD. Benign post-operative bile duct strictures. Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol. 1997; 11: 749-779.

  6. Flum DR, Cheadle A, Prela C, Dellinger EP, Chan L. Bile duct injury during cholecystectomy and survival in medicare beneficiaries. JAMA. 2003; 290: 2168-2173.

  7. Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Giovannini I, Ardito F, D’Acapito F, Vellone M, et al. Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of an Italian national survey on 56 591 cholecystectomies. Arch Surg. 2005; 140: 986-992.

  8. Waage A, Nilsson M. Iatrogenic bile duct injury: a population-based study of 152 776 cholecystectomies in the Swedish Inpatient Registry. Arch Surg. 2006; 141: 1207-1213.

  9. Lau WY, Lai EC. Classification of iatrogenic bile duct injury. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2007; 6: 459-463.

  10. Fingerhut A, Dziri C, Garden OJ, Gouma D, Millat B, Neugebauer E, et al. ATOM, the all-inclusive, nominal EAES classification of bile duct injuries during cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27: 4608-4619.

  11. Doctor N, Dooley JS, Dick R, Watkinson A, Rolles K, Davidson BR. Multidisciplinary approach to biliary complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1998; 85: 627-632.

  12. Connor S, Garden OJ. Bile duct injury in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2006; 93: 158-168.

  13. Girometti R, Brondani G, Cereser L, Como G, Del Pin M, Bazzocchi M, et al. Post-cholecystectomy syndrome: spectrum of biliary findings at magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Br J Radiol. 2010; 83: 351-361.

  14. H a l e f o g l u A M . M a g n e t i c r e s o n a n c e cholangiopancreatography: a useful tool in the evaluation of pancreatic and biliary disorders. World J Gastroenterol. 2007; 13: 2529-2534.

  15. Rossi M, Salvatori F, Giglio L, Fanelli F, Cantisani V, Rossi P, et al. Interventional radiology techniques in the treatment of complications due to videolaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Radiol Med. 2003; 103: 384-395.

  16. Gibson RN, Vincent JM, Speer T, Collier NA, Noack K. Accuracy of computed tomographic intravenous cholangiography (CT-IVC) with iotroxate in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Eur Radiol. 2005; 15: 1634-1642.

  17. Busel MD, Pérez ML, Arroyo PA, Ortega TD, Niedmann EJ, Palavecino RP, et al. Colangiorresonancia (CPRM) vs ultrasonido (US) focalizado en pacientes con ictericia o sospecha de obstrucción de la vía biliar: resultados preliminares. Rev Chil Radiol. 2003; 9: 173-181.

  18. Kaltenthaler EC, Walters SJ, Chilcott J, Blakeborough A, Vergel YB, Thomas S. MRCP compared to diagnostic ERCP for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: a systematic review. BMC Med Imaging. 2006; 6: 9.

  19. Bismuth H, Majno PE. Biliary strictures: classification based on the principles of surgical treatment. World J Surg. 2001; 25: 1241-1244.

  20. Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1995; 180: 101-125.

  21. Jayasundara JA, de Silva WM, Pathirana AA. Changing clinical profile, management strategies and outcome of patients with biliary tract injuries at a tertiary care center in Sri Lanka. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2011; 10: 526-532.

  22. Gwon DI, Ko GY, Ko HK, Yoon HK, Sung KB. Percutaneous transhepatic treatment using retrievable covered stents in patients with benign biliary strictures: mid-term outcomes in 68 patients. Dig Dis Sci. 2013; 58: 3270-3279.

  23. Nealon WH, Urrutia F. Long-term follow-up after bilioenteric anastomosis for benign bile duct stricture. Ann Surg. 1996; 223: 639-645; discussion 645-648.

  24. Boraschi P, Nonati F. Biliary-enteric anastomoses: spectrum of findings on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR cholangiography. Abdom Imaging 2013;38:1351-1359.

  25. García-Cano J. Endoscopic management of benign biliary strictures. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2013; 15: 336.

  26. Nagano Y, Togo S, Tanaka K, Masui H, Endo I, Sekido H, et al. Risk factors and management of bile leakage after hepatic resection. World J Surg. 2003; 27: 695-698.

  27. Cerda LJ, Villarroel PL. Evaluación de la concordancia inter-observador en investigación pediátrica: Coeficiente de Kappa. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2008; 79: 54-58.

  28. Warrens MJ. On the equivalence of Cohen’s kappa and the Hubert-Arabie adjusted rand index. Journal of Classification. 2008; 25: 177-183.

  29. Knottnerus JA, van Weel C, Muris JW. Evaluation of diagnostic procedures. BMJ. 2002; 324: 477-480.

  30. Mercado MA, Domínguez I. Classification and management of bile duct injuries. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2011; 3: 43-48.

  31. Sahajpal AK, Chow SC, Dixon E, Greig PD, Gallinger S, Wei AC. Bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: timing of repair and long-term outcomes. Arch Surg. 2010; 145: 757-763.

  32. Zhong L, Yao QY, Li L, Xu JR. Imaging diagnosis of pancreato-biliary diseases: a control study. World J Gastroenterol. 2003; 9: 2824-2827.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Gen. 2017;39