medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Medicina Crítica

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • Policies
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Med Crit 2017; 31 (5)

200 days of qSOFA, early detection of sepsis and risk reduction

Pedraza OF, Monares ZE, Galindo MCA, Rodríguez GJH, Valles GA, Cruz SMA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 5
Page: 265-267
PDF size: 131.55 Kb.


Key words:

qSOFA, sepsis, rapid response.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: When the quick Sepsis Related Organ Failure Assessment or qSOFA is used to activate a rapid response team the main goal is to detect in a early fashion those patients whose deterioration is secondary to sepsis and the rapid response teams are known as «sepsis team» or «code sepsis».
Methods: We present the first 200 days of an early sepsis detection program using the latest recommendations. Patients admitted with a «no resuscitation» letter, terminal disease diagnosis and palliative care, were excluded from the study, also pediatric patients (< 18 years old) and obstetric diagnosis.
Results: During the study period a total of 111 alerts were registered by the rapid response team using the qSOFA score. As well, 34 alerts for every 1,000 admissions. For every 6 assessments 1 patient benefited of being transferred immediately to the Intensive Care Unit; for an absolute risk reduction of 18.26% (95% confidence interval -16.47 a 52.99). For every 6 patients with risk data not detected 1 will die. For every 2 patients admitted to the rapid response program 1 was benefited by the established treatment.
Conclusion: The present work shows that the use of the qSOFA score in our population resulted in the absolute risk reduction of mortality.


REFERENCES

  1. Jones DA, DeVita MA, Bellomo R. Rapid-response teams. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(2):139-146.

  2. Chan P, Peake S, Bellomo R, Jones D. Improving the recognition of, and response to in-hospital sepsis. Curr Infect Dis Resp. 2016;18(7):20.

  3. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymur CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801-810.

  4. Bhattacharjee P, Edelson DP, Churpek MM. Identifiying patients with sepsis on the hospital wards. Chest. 2017;151(4):898-907. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.06020

  5. Bannard-Smith J, Lighthall GK, Subbe CP, Durham L, Welch J, Bellomo R, et al. Clinical outcomes of patients seen by rapid response teams: a template for benchmarking international teams. Resuscitation. 2016. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.07.001




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Med Crit. 2017;31