medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Medicina Crítica

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • Policies
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Med Crit 2017; 31 (5)

Comparation between subjective global assessment and modified subjective global assessment with anthropometric and laboratory markers for detecting risk of malnutrition in critically ill patients

Zúñiga GPR, Esparza CEF, Chávez PCE, Muñoz RMR, Sánchez NVM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 268-274
PDF size: 133.71 Kb.


Key words:

Subjective global assessment, malnutrition, critically ill patient, mortality, ASPEN, JPEN.

ABSTRACT

Malnutrition is an importantproblem among ambulatory and hospitalized patients, specially en the setting of Intensive Care Units. There are several scales for diagnosing malnutrition, that require complicated measures and/or the use of biomarkers. The Subjective Global Assessment es a tool that help the clinician to assess malnutrition in a very simple way at the bedside, and offers a good correlation with the aforementioned trials. Adjustments in the Subjective Global Assessment have been made in order to make it fit to certain group of patients. The Modified Subjective Gobal Assessment in our facilities may be useful for correct diagnosis and therapeutic guidance. To assess this new scale it was compared with the two most sensible parameters for the malnutrition diangosis and its original scale.


REFERENCES

  1. Bector S, Vagianos K, Suh M, Duerksen DR. Does subjective global assessment predict outcome in critically ill medical patients? J Intensive Care Med. 2016;31(7):485-489.

  2. Bharadwaj S, Ginoya S, Tandon P, Gohel TD, Guirguis J, Vallabh H, et al. Malnutrition: laboratory markers vs nutritional assessment. Gatroenterology Report (Oxf). 2016;4(4):272-280.

  3. Correira M, Santos C, Almeida C, Fonseca JJ. Scored patient-generated subjective, albumin and transferrin for nutritional assessment of gastrostomy fed head or neck cancer patients. Nutr Hosp. 2014;29(2):420-426.

  4. Detsky AS, McLaughlin JR, Baker JP, Johnston N, Whittaker S, Mendelson RA, et al. What is subjective global assessment of nutrition status? JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1987;11(1):8-13.

  5. Jensen GL, Bistrain B, Rubenoff R, Heimburger DC. Malnutrition syndormes: a conundrum vs continuum. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2009;33(6):710-716.

  6. Moriama M, Civera M, Artero A, Real J, Caro J, Ascaso J, et al. Validity of subjective global assessment as a screening method for hospital malnutrition. Prevalence of malnutrition in a trietary hospital. Endocrinol Nutr. 2014;61(4):184-189.

  7. Poulia K, Yannakoulia M, Karageorgou D, Gamaletsou M, Panagiotakos D, Sipsas N, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of six nutritional screening tolos to predict malnutritionin the elderly. Clin Nutr. 2012;31:378-385.

  8. McClave S, Taylor B, Martindale R, Warren M, Johnson D, Braunschweig C, et al. Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: Society of critical care medicine (SCCM) and american society for parenteral and enteral nutrition. ASPEN. 2016;44(2):390-438.

  9. White J, Guenter P, Jensen G, Malone A, Shofield M, Academy Malnutrition Work Group, et al. Consensus statement: Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and American Society of parenteral and enteral nutrition: characteristics recommended for the identification and documentation of adult malnutrition (Undernutrition). JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2012;36(6):275-283.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Med Crit. 2017;31