medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Neurociencia

Academia Mexicana de Neurología, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Neuroci 2017; 18 (5)

Neuropsychological evaluation of pragmatics in a patient with acquired brain injury

Galparsoro- Izagirre N, Sánchez- Cubillo I, Migueles M, Adrover-Roig D
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 88-95
PDF size: 294.74 Kb.


Key words:

communication, brain injury, assessment.

ABSTRACT

Studies in patients with brain injury have provided to clinical practice a wide range of valuable language assessment tools and rehabilitation strategies. In contrast, the ability to make a proper use of language adapted to a specific social and cultural context has been scarcely explored in brain-damaged patients. Therefore, clinicians still lack specific assessment batteries to diagnose pragmatic difficulties in these patients. Given the importance of such disorders on their social and professional reinsertion, we aimed at studying the usefulness of the Montréal Protocol for the Evaluation of Communication (MEC) in order to detect abnormal pragmatic capacities in a patient with a brain injury, as compared to a control participant. In addition, we explored the role of other cognitive processes, such as executive functions and social cognition on pragmatics. Results revealed that the MEC is a useful protocol to structure and guide the evaluation process of pragmatics, and it is sensitive to most of the symptoms observed at baseline. A partial dissociation between executive control and pragmatics was evident in the presented case, along with an impaired ability to recognize facial emotions, a difficulty that might explain some of the symptoms observed at the pragmatic level.


REFERENCES

  1. Tippett DC, Niparko JK, Hillis AE. Aphasia: Current concepts in theory and practice. J Neurol Transl Neurosci. 2014; 2: 1042.

  2. Muñoz-Céspedes JM, Melle N. Alteraciones de la pragmática de la comunicación después de un traumatismo craneoencefálico. Rev Neurol. 2010; 38: 852-859.

  3. Milders M, Fuchs S, Crawford JR. Neuropsychological Impairments and changes in emotional and social behaviour following severe traumatic brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003; 25: 157-172.

  4. Ubukata S, Tanemura R, Yoshizumi M, Sugihara G, Murai T, Ueda K. Social cognition and its relationship to functional outcomes in patients with sustained acquired brain injury. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014; 10: 2061-2068.

  5. Ruffman T, Slade L, Rowlandson K, Rumsey C, Garnham A. How language relates to belief, desire and emotion understanding. Cognitive Development. 2003; 18: 139-158.

  6. Tate RL. Executive dysfunction and characterological changes after traumatic brain injury: Two sides of the same coin? Cortex. 1999; 35: 39-55.

  7. Ferreres A, Abusamra V, Cuitiño M, Côté, H, Ska B, & Joanette Y. Protocolo MEC. Protocolo para la evaluación de la comunicación de Montreal. Buenos Aires: Neuropsi Ediciones; 2007.

  8. Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Jolliffe T. Is there a ‘language of the eyes’? Evidence from normal adults and adults with autism or Asperger syndrome. Vis Cogn. 1997; 4: 311-331.

  9. Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Hill J, Raste Y, Plumb I. The ‘Reading the Mind in the Eyes’ Test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. J Child Psychol Psychiat. 2001; 42: 241-251.

  10. Heaton RK, Cheleune GJ, Talley JL, Kay GG, Curtis G. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST): Manual revised and expanded. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1993.

  11. Shallice T. Specific impairments in planning. Philosophical Transcripts of the Royal Society of London 1982; 298: 199-209.

  12. Reitan RM. Trail Making Test: Manual for administration and scoring. Tucson, AZ: Reitan Neuropsychology Laboratory; 1958.

  13. Román F, Rojas G, Román N, Iturry M, Blanco R, Leis A, et al. Baremos del Test de la mirada en español en adultos noramles de Buenos Aires. Rev Neuropsicología Latinoamericana. 2012; 4: 1-5.

  14. Periáñez JA, Ríos-Lago M, Rodríguez-Sánchez JM, Adrover-Roig D, Sánchez-Cubillo I, Crespo- Facorro B, et al. Trail Making Test in traumatic brain injury, schizophrenia, and normal ageing: sample comparisons and normative data. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007; 22: 433-447.

  15. Guranski K, Podemski R. Emotional prosody expression in acoustic analysis in patients with right hemisphere ischemic stroke. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2015; 49:113-120.

  16. Lough S, Gregory C, Hodges JR. Dissociation of social cognition and executive function in frontal variant frontotemporal dementia. Neurocase. 200; 7: 123-130.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Neuroci. 2017;18