medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3062 (Electronic)

2017, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Obstetricia y Ginecología 2017; 43 (1)

Tubal ectopic pregnancy and laparoscopic transverse incision surgery compared to longitudinal incision

Vasallo PR, Sarduy NMR, Díaz RB, Reyes LGA, del Valle AO, Molina PL

Language: Spanish
References: 27
Page: 1-15
PDF size: 290.88 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: The management and treatment of ectopic pregnancy has evolved dramatically in recent years. Presently, conservative therapy, both medical and surgical, prevails. The latter is manifested as a function of fertility despite the increase in tubal conditions.
Objective: Determine the use of the transverse salpingostomy technique with respect to the number of intrauterine pregnancies and subsequent relapses.
Methods: An experimental, longitudinal and prospective study was performed in patients diagnosed with ectopic pregnancy from 2007 to 2012 at Center for Medical-Surgical Research. 251 patients of childbearing age were the population of this study and they came to Center for Medical-Surgical Research emergency room for having low-grade pain, abnormal uterine bleeding and / or amenorrhea, who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy.This population consisted of 251 patients of childbearing age, who came to the Center for Medical-Surgical Research Guard Corps for having pain in the lower abdomen, abnormal uterine bleeding and / or amenorrhea. They underwent diagnostic laparoscopy. 204 of them were diagnosed of ectopic pregnancy, with 167 ampullaries. All women who underwent transverse salpingostomy showed interest in preserving fertility. 200 patients were the control sample ant they presented with ampullary ectopic pregnancy. These patients underwent longitudinal conservative surgery in an immediate previous period (2004-2007).
Results: It was demonstrated that by the transverse salpingostomy technique, greater number of intrauterine pregnancies were achieved (60); fewer ectopic recurrences (10) with highly significant values with respect to linear salpingostomy.
Conclusions: The benefit of using transverse salpingostomy technique in relation to the number of pregnancies achieved was 4 times higher than the risk of developing relapses or complications in the period of one year.


REFERENCES

  1. Ehrenberg-Buchner S, Sandadi S, Moawad NS, Pinkerton JS, Hurd WW. Ectopic pregnancy: role of laparoscopic treatment. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;52(3):372-9.

  2. Sivalingam VN, Duncan WC, Kirk E, Shephard LA, Horne AW. Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2011;37(4):231-40.

  3. Guamushig Aimacaña MS. Embarazo ectópico y reacción decidual [Doctor en Medicina]. Ambato, Ecuador: Universidad Técnica de Ambato. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud; 2015.

  4. Cuba. Ministerio de Salud Pública. Embarazo ectópico: orientaciones metodológicas para el manejo y control de todo el sistema de salud de las mujeres con embarazo ectópico y sus complicaciones. La Habana: MINSAP; 2002 [cited 2016 10 de julio]. Available from: file://D:PendientesMONOGRAFIASClinicas Neurologicas2015Movement DisordersinSystemicDiseases.pdf

  5. Department of Health. Report of confidential enquires into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom 1991-93. London: HMSO; 1996.

  6. Capmas P, Bouyer J, Fernandez H. Treatment of ectopic pregnancies in 2014: new answers to some old questions. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(3):615-20.

  7. Moore KL, Dalley AF. Anatomía con orientación clínica. 5 ed. Buenos Aires: Ed. Médica Panamericana; 2009.

  8. Cunningham GF, Gant NT, Leveno KJ, Gilstrap LC, Hauth JC. Embarazo ectópico. Williams: Obstetricia. 21. Buenos Aires: Panamericana; 2005. p. 757-76.

  9. Peled Y, Ben-Haroush A, Eitan R, Eiger M, Pardo J, Krissi H. The accuracy of the preoperative diagnosis in women undergoing emergent gynecological laparoscopy for acute abdominal pain. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284(6):1439-42.

  10. Robles Aguila JR. La historia de la laparoscopia 2012 [10/08/2016]. Available from: http://documents.mx/documents/historia-de-laparoscopia.html

  11. Rana P, Kazmi I, Singh R, Afzal M, Al-Abbasi FA, Aseeri A, et al. Ectopic pregnancy: a review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;288(4):747-57.

  12. Cuba. Ministerio de Salud Pública. Anuario estadístico de salud 2015: MINSAP; 2016 [updated 2016/02/08/10 de julio, 2016]. Available from: http://files.sld.cu/dne/files/2016/04/Anuario_2015_electronico-1.pdf

  13. Vaswani PR. Predictors of success of medical management of ectopic pregnancy in a tertiary care hospital in United arab emirates. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(8). DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8152.4712.

  14. Kazandi M, Turan V. Ectopic pregnancy; risk factors and comparison of intervention success rates in tubal ectopic pregnancy. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38(1):67-70.

  15. De Los Ríos F, Castañeda JD, Restrepo EA. Salpingostomía lineal por laparoscópia para el tratamiento de un embarazo ectópico bilateral espontáneo: reporte de caso. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2006;57:54-7.

  16. Vasallo P, Sarduy M, Chang I. Cirugía conservadora e incisión transversal tubárica por laparoscopia en el embarazo tubárico ampular. Invest Medicoquir. 2016;8(1):68-81.

  17. Altunaga Palacio M, Rodríguez Morales Y, Lugones Botell M. Manejo del embarazo ectópico. Rev Cubana Obstet Ginecol [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2016 10 de julio]; 37:[513-23 pp.]. Available from: http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/gin/v37n4/gin08411.pdf .

  18. de Bennetot M, Rabischong B, Aublet-Cuvelier B, Belard F, Fernandez H, Bouyer J, et al. Fertility after tubal ectopic pregnancy: results of a population-based study. FertilSteril. 2012;98(5):1271-6.

  19. Jamard A, Turck M, Pham AD, Dreyfus M, Benoist G. Fertility and risk of recurrence after surgical treatment of an ectopic pregnancy (EP): Salpingostomy versus salpingectomy. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016;45(2):129-38.

  20. Niu J, Cui X, Wan X, Zhang K. Clinical application of tubal reconstruction after laparoscopic tubal pregnancy operation. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012;26(9):1088-90.

  21. Alkatout I, Stuhlmann-Laeisz C, Mettler L, Jonat W, Schollmeyer T. Organpreserving management of ovarian pregnancies by laparoscopic approach. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(8):2467-70.

  22. Stamatopoulos N, Casikar I, Reid S, Roy B, Branley J, Mongelli M, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis in fallopian tubes of women undergoing laparoscopy for ectopic pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;52(4):377-9.

  23. Cabezas Cruz E. Embarazo ectópico. Rev Cubana Obstet Ginecol [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2016 10 de julio];39(4):[314-5 pp.]. Available from: http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/gin/v39n4/gin01413.pdf

  24. Rigol Ricardo O. Obstetricia y ginecolog¡a. La Habana: Ciencias M‚dicas 6; 2008.

  25. Oliva Rodrígues JA. Temas de Obstetricia y Ginecología. La Habana: MINSAP; 2006.

  26. Stock L, Milad M. Surgical management of ectopic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;55(2):448-54.

  27. Craig LB, Khan S. Expectant management of ectopic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;55(2):461-70.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com