medigraphic.com
ISSN 8541-3697 (Print)

2018, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

AbanicoVet 2018; 8 (1)

Reproduction and mortality of breeds cattle in subtropical climate of Argentina

Verdoljak J, Pereira M, Gándara L, Acosta F, Fernández-López C, Martínez-González J

Language: Spanish
References: 26
Page: 28-35
PDF size: 519.39 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Tropical environmental climate causes low reproductive rates in cattle, so the objective of the present study was to evaluate the possible effects of the climate on the reduction of the rates of bovine reproduction. The work was carried out in the Experimental Agriculture Station (EAS) in Corrientes, Argentina, where, 3,082 bovine herd records data were analyzed from 1991 to 2009, three breeds, Hereford (HR), Braford (BF) and Brahman (BH). It was evaluated the percentage of losses from the diagnosis of gestation until the delivery (DP) and from the delivery until the weaning to the 205 d (PD). Data were analyzed by analysis of variance in a completely randomized design and with an analysis of correlation. The greater losses (P ‹ 0.05) were observed during the period of gestation for them cows BH and BF, the humidity relative not presented difference (P › 0.05) between DP and PD. There was a correlation between the humidity and the radiation with the cows that were not in gestation (HR and BF), the cows BH not presented any relation.


REFERENCES

  1. ARIAS R, Meyer L, Sánchez C. 2008. Factores climáticos que afectan el desempeño reproductivo del ganado bovino de carne y leche (Tesis Licenciatura). Tamuco, Chile: Univ Católica.

  2. ARROYO AJJ, Elizondo SJA. 2014. Prevalencia de falla en la transferencia de inmunidad pasiva en terneras de lechería. Agronomía Mesoamericana. 25(2):279-285. http://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/agromeso/issue/view/1602

  3. BURROW HM, Prayaga KC.2004. Correlated responses in productive and adaptive traits and temperament following selection for growth and heat resistance in tropical beef cattle. Livestock Production Science. 86(1-3):143-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2003.06.001

  4. COL BA, Kadzere CT, Murphy MR. 2002. Heat stress in lactating dairy cows: a review. Livestock Production Science. 77(1):59-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301- 6226(01)00330-X

  5. CÓRDOVA IA, Murillo MA, Castillo JH. 2009. Efecto de factores climáticos sobre la conducta reproductiva bovina en los trópicos. Una revisión. Revista electrónica de Veterinaria. 11(1):1-12. http://www.veterinaria.org/revistas/redvet/n010110/011006.pdf

  6. DA SILVA RG. 2006. Weather and climate and animal production. En: Update of the guide to agricultural meteorological practices. WMO-No.134. http://www.agrometeorology.org/files-folder/repository/

  7. DE LUCA LJ. Aborto bovino; causas, frecuencia, etiopatogenia, inmunidad. 2002. (Consultada en 2016/09/15). http://www.produccionbovina.com/sanidad_intoxicaciones_metabolicos/enfermedades_r eproduccion/37-aborto_bovino.pdf

  8. DOBSON H, Smith RF. 2000. What is stress, and how does it affect reproduction? Animal Reproduction Science. 60-61(1):743-752. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378- 4320(00)00080-4

  9. DRAGHI MG, Soni CA, Beckwith B, Zurbriggen MA, Homse AC, Rochinotti D, Rizzi CA, Alcaraz EL, Caspe SG, Ramírez JC, Pereira M, Biotti GM, Ramírez LM, Sosa CG. 2007. Estudio de las distintas causas de mortalidad perinatal en bovinos en el Nordeste Argentino. Serie Técnica. 40(1):1-38. http://inta.gob.ar/sites/default/files/script-tmp-inta- _mortalidad_perinatal_bovinos.pdf

  10. ESCOBAR J, Huertas F. 2005. Influencias climáticas sobre la reproducción en Ganado Holstein. Medellin, Colombia. V Reunión ALPA, G-70.

  11. FABER SN, Faber NE, McCauley TC, Ax RL. 2005. Effects of colostrum ingestion on lactational performance. Professional Animal Science. 21(4):420-425. http://dx.doi.org/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)31240-7

  12. GRANJA SYT, Ribeiro JC, Toro GD, Rivera CL, Machado M, Manrique AA. 2012. Acidosis ruminal en bovinos lecheros: implicaciones sobre la producción y la salud animal. Revista electrónica de Veterinaria. 13(1):1-11. http://www.veterinaria.org/revistas/redvet/n040412/041210.pdf

  13. HANSEN PJ, Drost M, Rivera RM, Paula-Lopes FF, Al-Katanani YM, Krininger CE, Chase CC. 2001. Adverse impact of the heat stress on embryo production: causes and strategies for mitigation. Theriogenology. 55(1):91-103. http://www.theriojournal.com/article/S0093- 691X(00)00448-9/pdf

  14. INFOSTAT. 2014. Software estadístico InfoStat. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina.

  15. INGRAHAM RR, Gillette D, Wagner W. 1974. Relationship of temperature and humidity to conception rate of Holstein cows in subtropical climate. Journal of Dairy Science. 57(4):476-481. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(74)84917-9

  16. LARA JE, Bottegal DN, Zimerman M, Suarez AF, Ballón M, Martínez-Calsina L. 2014. Condiciones ambientales y consumo de agua en un sistema silvopastoril comparado con un sistema pastoril. Revista Argentina de Producción Animal. 34(Suppl 1):213-290. http://ppct.caicyt.gov.ar/index.php/rapa/article/view/5380/4996

  17. LÓPEZ H, Satter LD, Wiltbank MC. 2004. Relationship between level of milk production and estrous behavior of lactating dairy cows. Animal Reproduction Science. 81(3-4):209- 223. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2003.10.009

  18. MANSILLA V. 2006. Estudio preliminar de algunas variables climáticas sobre la eficiencia reproductiva en vacas Holstein Friesian en la provincia de nuble (Tesis de Licenciatura). Concepción, Chile: Univ de Concepción.

  19. MONTIEL F, Ahuja C. 2005. Body condition and suckling as factors influencing the duration of postpartum anestrus in cattle: a review. Animal Reproduction Science. 85(1- 2):1-26. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2003.11.001

  20. NIENABER JA, Hahn GL, Brown-Brandl TM, Eigenberg RA. 2003. Heat stress climatic conditions and the physiological responses of cattle. 5th International Dairy Housing Proceedings of the 29-31 January Conference, Fort Worth Texas, USA. ASAE publication N° 701P0203, Pp 255-262.

  21. PIRES AV, Ribeiro CV, Mendes CQ. 2011. Aspectos nutricionais relacionados à reprodução. Págs. 537-563 En: Berchielli TT, Pires VA, De Oliveira SM. Nutrição de ruminantes (2ª edição), Jaboticabal: FUNEP.

  22. RENAUDEAU D. 2005. Effects of short-term exposure to high ambient temperature and relative humidity on thermoregulatory responses of European (Large White) and Caribbean (Creole) restrictively-fed growing pigs. Animal Research. 54(2):81-93. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:2005005

  23. RIVERA-SUAREZ F, Madrid-Buri N, González-Stagnaro C, Sandoval-Sánchez L. 2006. Efecto del índice humedad-temperatura sobre la tasa de fertilidad en vacas mestizas. Revista Científica. 11(1):30-34. http://www.saber.ula.ve/bitstream/123456789/27440/2/articulo4.pdf

  24. ROMÁN PH. 2008. Efecto del estrés térmico sobre la fertilidad del Ganado bovino. Veracruz, México. P.265-288.

  25. SARTORI R. 2006. Mortalidad Embrionaria en Bovinos Lecheros. Brazil: Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. http://www.syntexar.com/descargas/4Espanol%20Sartori-Morte%20embr.pdf

  26. URIBE VLF, Oba E, Brasil LHA, Souza FN, Wechsler FS. 2001. Efeitos do estresse termico nas concentracoes plasmaticas de progesterona (P4) e estradiol 17-b (E2) e temperatura retal em cabras da raça Pardo Alpina. Revista Brasileña de Zootecnia. 30(2):388-393. http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbz/v30n2/5479.pdf




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com