medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Ginecología y Obstetricia de México

Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 10

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2017; 85 (10)

Auscultation and automated electronic blood pressure device interchangeability in non-hypertensive pregnant women. A pilot study

Oviedo-Cruz H, Reyes-Mendoza MÁ, Cortés-Martínez MA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 7
Page: 653-658
PDF size: 526.04 Kb.


Key words:

(MeSH): Blood Pressure Determination, Sphygmomanometers, Blood Pressure Monitors, Reproducibility of Results, Humans, Pregnancy, Preeclampsia.

ABSTRACT

Objetive: To define the sample size needed to evaluate exchangeability between the auscultation method and the automated electronic device for MAP measurement in pregnancies without hypertension.
Materials and Methods: A standardized blood pressure measurement on both arms, and by both methods was performed on 30 pregnancies without hypertension; the combined MAP correlation coefficient was calculated, using the lower CI95% for final sample size needed.
Results: Correlation between methods was r = 0.557 (CI95% = 0.246; 0.763, p = 0.001 and r2 = 0.3097).
Conclusions: The statistically significant correlation between methods could be clinically unacceptable for exchangeability; a sample size of n = 127 is needed to prove it.


REFERENCES

  1. Cnossen JS, Vollebregt KC, de Vrieze N, ter Riet G, Mol BW, et al. Accuracy of mean arterial pressure and blood pressure measurements in predicting pre-eclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2008;336:1117-20.

  2. Akolekar R, Syngelaki A, Poon L, Wright D and Nicolaides KH. Competing risks model in early screening for preeclampsia by biophysical and biochemical markers. Fetal Diagn Ther 2013;33:8-15.

  3. Crovetto F, Figueras F, Triunfo S, Crispi F, Rodríguez-Sureda V, et al. Added value of angiogenic factors for the prediction of early and late preeclampsia in the first trimester of pregnancy. Fetal Diagn Ther 2014;35:258-66.

  4. Poon LCY, Zymeri NA, Zamprakou A, Syngelaki A and Nicolaides KH. Protocol for measurement of mean arterial pressure at 11-13 weeks' gestation. Fetal Diagn Ther 2012;31:42-48.

  5. Pomini F, Scavo M, Ferrazzani S, De Carolis S, Caruso A, et al. There is poor agreement between manual auscultatory and automated oscillometric methods for the measurement of blood pressure in normotensive pregnant women. J Matern Fetal Med 2001;10:398-403.

  6. Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, et al. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: Part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Circulation 2005;111:697-716.

  7. Giavarina D. Understanding Bland Altman analysis. Biochemia Medica 2015;25:141-151.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2017;85