medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista ADM Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana

ISSN 0001-0944 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Rev ADM 2017; 74 (6)

Diagnosis of C-shaped root canals in mandibular second molars through the «evidence of obtained angle». A pilot validation study

Astudillo-Ortiz E, Palacios A, Cáceres-Carpio J, Astudillo J
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 293-297
PDF size: 291.15 Kb.


Key words:

Mandibular second molar, C-shaped root canal, panoramic radiography, diagnosis.

ABSTRACT

Background: The gold standard to diagnose second molars with C-shaped root canals prior to beginning an endodontic and restorative treatment is cone-beam tomography. Tomographic services are hard to access and have a low distribution in dental clinics this has led us to design an alternative technique in panoramic radiographs named «evidence of the obtained angle» (EAO). Objective: The aim of this study was to create a breakpoint and estimate its diagnostic accuracy through a pilot study; its results will be used in a future investigation of validation of diagnostic tests. Methods: The pilot study included 37 cone-beam computed tomographies (CBCT) of a database property of the authors, which included their respective panoramic reconstruction, to which the technique EAO was applied; its results were validated applying diagnostic tests. A total of 74 second mandibular molars were analyzed. Results: A prevalence of 39.19 second molars with C-shaped root canal was obtained (CI 95%: 27.39:50.99), of which 61.11% corresponded to female patients. The breakpoint retrieved was of 6.9 degrees, the sensitivity was of 89.66% (IC 95% 76.85: 100.00), specificity 93.33% (IC 95% 84.93:100.00), index of validity 91.89% (IC 95% 85.00:98.79) positive predictive value 89.66% (IC 95% 76.85:100.00) and negative predictive value 93.33% (IC 95% 84.93:100.00), index of Youden 0.83 (IC 95% 0.70:0.96), positive likelihood ratio 13.45 (IC 95% 4.48:40.41), negative likelihood ratio 0.11 (IC 95% 0.04: 0.32). Conclusions: The breakpoint 6.9 degrees of the technique EAO applied on panoramic radiographs is valid and effective for the diagnosis of C-shaped root canals in mandibular second molars; it could, therefore, be validated in studies of diagnostic tests in the future.


REFERENCES

  1. Jin GC, Lee SJ, Roh BD. Anatomical study of C-shaped canals in mandibular second molars by analysis of computed tomography. J Endod. 2006; 32 (1): 10-13.

  2. Fan B, Cheung GS, Fan M, Gutmann JL, Bian Z. C-shaped canal system in mandibular second molars: part I-anatomical features. J Endod. 2004; 30 (12): 899-903.

  3. Haddad GY, Nehme WB, Ousni HF. Diagnosis, classification, and frequency of C-shaped canals in mandibular second molars in the Lebanese population. J Endod. 1999; 25 (4): 268-271.

  4. Cooke G, Cox F. C-shaped canal configurations in mandibular molars. JADA. 1979; 99 (5): 836-839.

  5. Siqueira JF Jr., Araújo MC, Garcia PF, Fraga RC, Dantas CJ. Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of root canals. J Endod. 1997; 23 (8): 499-502.

  6. Amoroso-Silva PA, Ordinola-Zapata R, Duarte MA, Gutmann JL, del Carpio-Perochena A et al. Micro-computed tomographic analysis of mandibular second molars with C-shaped root canals. J Endod. 2015; 41 (6): 890-895.

  7. Mathews J, Forsythe A, Brady Z, Butler M, Goergen S, Byrnes G et al. Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ. 2013; 346: f2360.

  8. Jung HJ, Lee SS, Huh KH, Yi WJ, Heo MS, Choi SC. Predicting the configuration of a C-shaped canal system from panoramic radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010; 109 (1): e37-41.

  9. Tamse A, Kaffe I. Radiographic survey of the prevalence of conical lower second molar. Int Endod J. 1981; 14 (3): 188-190.

  10. Gao Y, Fan B, Cheung GS, Gutmann JL, Fan M. C-shaped canal system in mandibular second molars part IV: 3-D morphological analysis and transverse measurement. J Endod. 2006; 32 (11): 1062-1065.

  11. Astudillo-Ortiz E, Palacios A, Astudillo J. Estudio piloto de validación de la técnica evidencia de ápices opuestos (EAO) para el diagnóstico de segundos molares mandibulares con conducto radicular en C. Cuenca. 2016. Enviado a revisión Revista Odontológica Mexicana 13 de noviembre de 2016.

  12. Quijano S, García C, Ríos K, Ruiz V, Ruiz A. Sistema de conducto radicular en forma de C en segundas molares mandibulares evaluados por tomografía cone beam. Rev Estomatol Herediana. 2016; 26 (1): 28-36.

  13. Zheng Q, Zhang L, Zhou X, Wang Q, Wang Y, Tang L et al. C-shaped root canal system in mandibular second molars in a Chinese population evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2011; 44 (9): 857-862.

  14. Seo MS, Park DS. C-shaped root canals of mandibular second molars in a Korean population: clinical observation and analysis in vitro. Int Endod J. 2004; 37 (2): 139-144.

  15. Yang ZP, Yang SF, Lin YC, Shay JC, Chi CY. C-shaped root canals in mandibular second molars in a Chinese population. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1988; 4 (4): 160-163.

  16. Al-Fouzan K. C-shaped root canals in mandibular second molars in a Saudi population. Int Endod J. 2002; 35 (6): 499-404.

  17. Gulabivala K, Opasanon A, Ng YL, Alavi A. Root and canal morphology of Thai mandibular molars. Int J Endod. 2002; 35 (1): 56-62.

  18. Helvacioglu-Yigit D, Sinanoglu A. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to evaluate C-shaped root canal systems in mandibular second molars in a Turkish subpopulation: a retrospective study. Int Endod J. 2013; 46 (11): 1032-1038.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev ADM. 2017;74