medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Ginecología y Obstetricia de México

Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 12

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2017; 85 (12)

Vaginal mesh for repair of apical and anterior vaginal prolapse: subjective outcomes and complications

Rodríguez-Colorado ES, Gorbea-Chávez V, Castillo-Luna R, Ramírez-Isarraraz C, Granados-Martínez V, Torres-Valdez E
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 825-833
PDF size: 337.72 Kb.


Key words:

Surgical mesh, Prolapse of pelvic organs, Vaginal surgery, Sacrospinous ligament.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The use of mesh with fixation to sacoespinous ligament (SEL) for correction of pelvic organ prolapse has a success rate of 92% and adverse events are reported in 2-12%. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical results after the application of Uphold mesh in women with apical prolapse with or without uterus.
Methods: A retrospective and descriptive study, 22 patients with E ≥ II voult pelvic organ prolapse who underwent vault fixation or hysteropexy to SEL and mediourethral tape (CMU) in those with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) from November-2013 to March-2017.
Results: 72.7% (n = 16) had previous hysterectomy. The pelvic organ prolapse stage was grade II in 18% (n = 4), III in 41% (n = 9) and IV in 41% (n = 9), the anterior compartment was affected in 40.9% and 59% (n = 13) for apical. 54.5% (n = 12) had SUI. In 9% (n = 2) were placed exclusively Uphold, concomitant surgery was performed for correction of posterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse in 45% (n=10) and at 68% (n = 15) CMU was placed. 9% (n = 2) had bladder injury, 40% (n = 9) urinary retention of patients with CMU application, 4.5% (n = 1) exposure and 4.5% (n = 1) extrusion. Subjective and objective success was 100%.
Conclusions:The placement of Uphold has successful results in the correction of apical prolapse. The concomitant anti-incontinence procedure increases the presence of urinary retention.


REFERENCES

  1. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Brown J. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;10:CD012376.

  2. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Marjoribanks J. Transvaginal mesh or grafts compared with native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;2:CD012079.

  3. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists / British Society of Urogynaecology. Post-Hysterectomy Vaginal Vault Prolapse. RCOG/BSUG Green Top Guideline No. 46; 2015. https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/ guidelines/gtg-46.pdf

  4. Lee U, Raz S. Emerging Concepts for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: What is cure? Curr Urol Rep 2011;12:62-67.

  5. Rahkola-Soisalo P, Altman D, Falconer C, Morcos E, Rudnicki M, Mikkola T. Quality of life after UpholdTM Vaginal Support System surgery for apical pelvic organ prolapse. A prospective multicenter study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017;208:86-90.

  6. Hugele F, Panel L, Farache C, Kashef A, Cornille A, Courtieu C. Two years follow up of 270 patients treated by transvaginal mesh for anterior and/or apical prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017;208:16-22.

  7. Alas A, Pereira I, Chandrasekaran N, Devakumar H, Espaillat L, Hurtado E, et al. Apical sling: an approach to posthysterectomy vault prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2016;27(9):1433-6.

  8. Altman D, Mikkola T, Bek K, Rahkola-Soisalo P, Gunnarsson J, Engh M, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse repair using the Uphold™ Vaginal Support System: a 1-year multicenter study. Int Urogynecol J 2016;27(9):1337-45.

  9. Rusavy Z, Rivaux G, Fatton B, Cayrac M, Boileau L, de Tayrac R. Voiding difficulties after vaginal mesh cystocele repair: does the perivesical dissection matter? Int Urogynecol J 2013;24:1385–90.

  10. Gutman R, Rardin C, Sokol E, Matthews C, Park A, Iglesia C, et al. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;216:38.e1-11.

  11. Letouzey V, Ulrich D, Balenbois E, Cornille A, de Tayrac R, Fatton B. Utero-vaginal suspension using bilateral vaginal anterior sacrospinous fixation with mesh: intermediate results of a cohort study. Int Urogynecol J 2015;26(12):1803-7.

  12. Vu M, Letko J, Jirschele K, Gafni-Kane A, Nguyen A, Du H, et al. Minimal mesh repair for apical and anterior prolapse: initial anatomical and subjective outcomes. Int Urogynecol J 2012;23:1753-61.

  13. Bump R, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker L, DeLancey J, Klarskov P, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:10-7.

  14. Haylen B, de Ridder D, Freeman R, Swift S, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn 2010;29(1):4-20.

  15. Jelovsek J, Chagin K, Brubaker L, Rogers R, Richter H, Arya, L, et al. A Model for Predicting the Risk of De Novo Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women Undergoing Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123(201):279-287.

  16. Ellington D, Richter H. Indications, Contraindications, and Complications of Mesh in Surgical Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2013;56(2):276-288.

  17. Jirschele K, Seitz M, Zhou Y, Rosenblatt P, Culligan P, Sand P. A multicenter, prospective trial to evaluate meshaugmented sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2015;26(5):743-748.

  18. Doucède G, Giraudet G, Lucot J, Marcelli F, Cosson M. Ureteral kinking during cystocele correction trough UpHold(®) subvesical mesh: case report. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016;203:334-5.

  19. El-Nashar S, Kim-Fine S, Trabuco E. Early and complete excision of vaginally placed synthetic mesh. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2013;19(3):186-7.

  20. de Tayrac R, Faillie J, Gaillet S, Boileau L, Triopon G, Letouzey V. Analysis of the learning curve of bilateral anterior sacrospinous ligament suspension associated with anterior mesh repair. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012;165(2):361-365.

  21. Kelly E, Winick-Ng J, Welk B. Surgeon Experience and Complications of Transvaginal Prolapse Mesh. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128(1):65-72.

  22. Wolff G, Winters C, Krlin R. Mesh Excision: Is Total Mesh Excision Necessary? Curr Urol Rep 2016;17(4):34.

  23. Smith A, Davila W. Take this simplified approach to correcting exposure of vaginal mesh. OBM management 2011;23(7):29-39.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2017;85