Cornelio RG, Casas RS, Ramírez AJL, Herrera MR

Language: Spanish
References: 8
Page: 20-23
PDF size: 481.27 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Müllerian congenital malformations are a relevant clinical entity, significantly in patients in reproductive age. There are multiple technological advances that contribute with the diagnosis by image of the malformations that can go from simple to complex., and has the objective of offering the best treatment.

REFERENCES

1. Saravelos SH, Cocksedge KA, Li TC. Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14:415-29.

2. Grimbizis GF, Camus M, Tarlatzis BC, Bontis JN, Devroey P. Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7:161-4.

3. Oppelt P, von Have M, Paulsen M, Strissel PL, Strick R, Bruker S. Female genital malformations and their associated abnormalities. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:335-42.

4. Buttram VC Jr. Mullerian anomalies and their management. Fertil Steril. 1983;40:159-63.

5. Strassmann EO. Fertility and unication of double uterus. Fertil Steril. 1966;17:165-76.

6. Valle RF. Endoscopic treatment of uterine anomalies. En: Pasic RP, Levine RL (eds). A practical manual of hysteroscopy and endometrial ablation techniques. London: Taylor & Francis Group; 2004. p. 104.

7. Bello Zambrano J, Maldonado Asuaje AK, Sánchez Bocaccio C. Infertilidad: histeroscopia versus ultrasonografía transvaginal e Histerosalpingografía. Rev Obstet Ginecol Venez. 2013;73(1):50-7.

8. García-Manero M, Alcázar JL. Ecografía tridimensional en la valoración del cuello y cuerpo uterino. Rev Med Univ Navarra, 2005;49(4):28-31.