medigraphic.com
Órgano Oficial del Instituto Nacional de Pediatría

2018, Number 2

Next >>

Acta Pediatr Mex 2018; 39 (2)

Maternal representations about health and breastfeeding of the premature child in hospitals with and without baby and mother friendly hospital initiative certification

Gallegos-Martínez J, Reyes-Hernández J

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 99-108
PDF size: 502.01 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Background: Breastfeeding in preterm infants in Mexico has a low prevalence despite being an affordable low-cost strategy recommended by WHO. One of the factors of abandonment is the maternal perception of low milk production.
Objective: Comparing the maternal representations on the health of the premature child and breast-feeding, in two hospitals, one of them with Baby and Mother Friendly Hospital Initiative certification.
Material and Methods: A qualitative study was carried out in two reference hospitals, one of them certified as a friend of the child and the mother (17 mothers and 1 father of premature babies) and one without a certificate (13 mothers). Collection instrument: Semistructured interview guide, interviews were conducted face-to-face by trained personnel. Thematic contents analysis was applied to the communications to apprehend the maternal representations according to the objective. Approval was obtained from the ethics committees of each hospital and informed consent was signed by the participants.
Results: Three representations were aprehended: 1. The health related corporeality of the premature child hospitalized; 2. Selecting the best food, breast milk versus formula for the premature child; and 3. The information received on breastfeeding.
Conclusions: The health of the premature child is represented in the corporeality, mainly the weight. Breast milk was represented as "good" food, which helped to initially choose to breastfeed her child. The perception of insufficient production, belief about maternal milk that damages, maternal labor activity and the prescription of substitutes give the possibility of abandonment of breastfeeding. The certified Baby and Mother Friendly Hospital denotes systematization for breastfeeding, with personnel and infrastructure assigned to that work and in the non-certified hospital only verbal or graphic informative actions are denoted.


REFERENCES

  1. March of Dimes, PMNCH, Save the Children, WHO. Born Too Soon: The Global Action Report on Preterm Birth. Eds CP Howson, MV Kinney, JE Lawn. World Health Organiza tion. Geneva, 2012. Acceso: http://www.who.int/pmnch/ media/news/2012/201204_borntoosoon- report.pdf.

  2. Colchero MA, Contreras-Loya D, Lopez-Gatell H, Gonzáles CT. The costs of inadequate breastfeeding of infants in México. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;101:579-86. doi: 10.3945/ ajcn.114.092775.

  3. Gutiérrez JP, Rivera-Dommarco J, Shamah-Levy T, Villalpando- Hernández S, Franco A, Cuevas-Nasu L, et al. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2012. Resultados Nacionales. Cuernavaca, México: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (MX), 2012.

  4. Quinlivan J, Kua S, Gibson R, McPhee A, Makrides MM. Can we identify women who initiate and then prematurely cease breastfeeding? An Australian multicentre cohort study. Int Breastfeed J. 2015;10:16. Doi: 10.1186/s13006- 015-0040-y.

  5. Maastrup R, Moelholm Hansen Bo, Kronborg H, Norby Bojesen S, Karin Hallum, Annemi Frandsen, et al. Breastfeeding progression in preterm infants is influenced by factors in infants, mothers and clinical practice: the results of a National Cohort Study with High Breastfeeding Initiation Rates. PLOS ONE, 2014;9(9):e108208. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108208

  6. Flacking R, Ewald U, Starrin B. “I Wanted to do a good job”: Experiences of “becoming a mother” and breastfeeding in mothers of very preterm infants after discharge from a neonatal unit. Social Science & Medicine, 2007;64:2405-2416.

  7. Ericson J, Flacking R, Hellström-Westas L, Eriksson M. Changes in the prevalence of breastfeeding in preterm infants discharged from neonatal units: a register study over 10 years. BMJ Open. 2016;6(12):e012900. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2016-012900.

  8. Barois J, Grognet S, Tourneux P, Leke A. Maternal and neonatal factors associated with successful brestfeeding in very preterm infants. Archives de Pédiatrie, 2013;20:969- 973. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arcped.2013.06.018.

  9. Blanco-Cervantes P, Hoyos-Loya E, Álvarez-Hernández G, Ramírez-Rodríguez CA. Prevalencia de lactancia materna exclusiva en el servicio de neonatología de un Hospital Pediátrico de Sonora, México. Bol Clin Hosp Infant Edo. Son, 2015;32(1):3-9. http://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/ bolclinhosinfson/bis-2015/bis151b.pdf.

  10. Dosani A, et al. Breastfeeding the late preterm infant: experiences of mothers and perceptions of public health nurses. Int Breastfeed J. 2017;8(12):23. doi: 10.1186/ s13006-017-0114-0.

  11. Gallegos-Martínez J, Reyes-Hernández J. Representations by caregivers, teachers, and children on food, nutrition, health, and school breakfast. Invest. Educ. Enferm. 2016;34(2):368-377. http://rccp.udea.edu.co/index.php/ iee/article/view/323272/20780816.

  12. Andreatta MM. Social representations on the study of diet related to health. Diaeta, 2013;31(142): 42-49.URI: http:// hdl.handle.net/11336/4493.

  13. Secretaría de Salud. Nacimientos ocurridos en hospitales de los Servicios de Salud del Estado de San Luis Potosí, 2011. Fuente: SINAC 2011. Subd. Informat. y Estadísticas en Salud.

  14. Gallegos-Martínez J, Reyes-Hernández J, Silvan-Scochi CG. The hospitalized preterm newborn: meanings for parents of their participation in the Neonatal Unit. ISSN: 0104- 1169 Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2013;21(6):1360-6. DOI: 10.1590/0104-1169.2970.2375.

  15. Miguélez MM. Validez y confiabilidad en la metodología cualitativa. Paradigma, 2006;27(2):07-33.

  16. Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and the maticanalysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013;15:398-405.

  17. Secretaría de Salud. Nueva Ley General de Salud publicada en el Diario Oficial de la Federación el 7 de febrero de 1984 Texto Vigente. Última reforma publicada DOF. 2013:25- 01. http://www.ordenjuridico.gob.mx/Publicaciones/ CDs2006/CDMigracion/pdf/F1.pdf

  18. Delgado-Becerra A, Arroyo-Cabrales LM, Díaz-García MA, Quezada-Salazar CA. Prevalencia y causas de abandono de lactancia materna en el alojamiento conjunto de una institución de tercer nivel de atención. Bol Med Hosp Inf Mex, 2006;63:31-39. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo. php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1665-11462006000100005.

  19. Osman H, El Zein L, WicK L. Cultural beliefs that may discourage breastfeeding among lebanese women: a qualitative analysis. Int Breastfeed J. 2009,4:12. Doi: 10.1186/1746- 4358-4-12.

  20. Oribe M, Lertxundi A, Basterrechea M, Begiristain H, Santa Marina L, et al. Prevalencia y factores asociados con la duración de la lactancia materna exclusiva durante los 6 primeros meses en la cohorte INMA Guipúzcoa. Gac. Sanit., 2015;29(1):4-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. gaceta.2014.08.002.

  21. Félix-Valenzuela JA, Martínez-Caldera E, Sotelo-Ham EI. Prevalencia y factores biosociales asociados al abandono de la lactancia materna exclusiva. Pediatría de México, 2011;13(2):47-56.

  22. Pino SJL, López EMÁ, Medel IAP, Ortega SA. Factores que inciden en la duración de la lactancia materna exclusiva en una comunidad rural de Chile. Rev Chil Nutr. 2013;40(1):48-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717- 75182013000100008.

  23. Bai DL, Fong DYT, Tarrant M. Previous breastfeeding experience and duration of any and exclusive breastfeeding among multiparous mothers. Birth, 2015;42(1):70-77. Doi: 10.1111/birt.12152.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com