medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Boletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de México

Boletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de México
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2005, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex 2005; 62 (5)

Diagnosis of nosocomial sepsis in neonates under 1 500 g by means of NOSEP-1 score.

Reyna-Figueroa J, Briseño-Vázquez R, Ortiz-Ibarra FJ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 8
Page: 321-328
PDF size: 83.21 Kb.


Key words:

Cross infection, nosocomial infections, newborn, diagnosis, clinimetric, NOSEP score.

ABSTRACT

Introduction. NOSEP-1 score was developed by Mahieu et al, to predict nosocomial sepsis in neonatal intensive care unit patients based on 3 laboratory, 1 clinical, and 1 historical variables potentially related with nosocomial infections.
Material and methods. NOSEP-1 score had 5 items including: C reactive protein, neutrophil fraction, thrombocytopenia, fever and parenteral nutrition. We evaluated the NOSEP score in premature patients lower than 1 500 g to predict nosocomial sepsis in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of Instituto Nacional de Perinatologia. Validity was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Gold standard was the blood culture and 2 or more features of systemic inflammatory response syndrome. We analyzed 2 groups of patients. Group 1: 50 newborns with negative blood culture, and group 2: 52 with positive blood culture, respectively.
Results. The point score was 8, with sensitivity of 62.7%, specificity of 70%, positive predictive value of 53.8%, and negative predictive value of 50%.
Conclusions. NOSEP-1 score is a simple indicator for detecting nosocomial infections in premature patients; however in the present study analyzing infants < 1 500 g, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value were lower than original report. We propose that if some of the variables are modified, the specificity may be improved.


REFERENCES

  1. 1998; 17: 593-8.

  2. Reyna FJ, Ortiz IFJ, Castro ML, Limón RAE. Identificación de marcadores clínicos y de laboratorio en recién nacidos con diagnóstico de meningitis bacteriana neonatal. Perinatol Reprod Hum. 2005; 19: 22-30.

  3. Ortiz IFJ, Reyna FJ, Aldana CRE, Lara SJ. Eficacia de la cuantificación de interleucina-6 en el líquido cefalorraquídeo para el diagnóstico de meningitis bacteriana neonatal. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 2005; 62: 249-54.

  4. Klein OJ. Bacterial sepsis and meningitis. En: Remington JS, Klein JO, editores. Infectious diseases of the fetus and newborn infant. 5th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2001. p. 550-3.

  5. Baraff IJ. Management of febrile child: a survey of pediatric and emergency medicine residency directors. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1991; 10: 795-800.

  6. Baraff IJ, Bass JW, Fleisher GR. Practice Guideline for the management of infants and children 0 to 36 months of age with fever without source. Pediatrics. 1993; 92: 1-12.

  7. Bonadio WA. Incidence of serious infections in afebrile neonates with a history of fever. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1987; 6: 911-4.

  8. Low DE, Schmidt BK, Kirpalani HM. An endemic strain of Staphylococcus haemolyticus colonizing and causing bacteremia in neonatal intensive care unit patient. Pediatrics. 1992; 89: 696-700.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 2005;62