medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de Especialidades Médico-Quirúrgicas

Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Esp Med Quir 2017; 22 (4)

Results of conservative treatment management in proximal humeral metaphyseal fractures in children

García-Ramírez VF, Mora-Ríos FG, Mejía-Rohenes C, Claro-Hernández JC, Pérez-Solares A
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 162-170
PDF size: 442.12 Kb.


Key words:

Proximal humerus, Children, Adolescents, Quick DASH.

ABSTRACT

Background: Metaphyseal proximal humeral fractures are lack of bone continuity below the humeral surgical neck region. They represent up to 27% of all fractures in the pediatric population and 0 5% to 3 5% occur in the proximal metaphyseal region. Several authors report a benign course in conservative treatment in patients younger than 13 years.
Objective: To report the results of conservative treatment in metaphyseal fractures of proximal humerus in pediatric patients treated at the General Regional Hospital Ignacio Zaragoza of the ISSSTE.
Material and Method: Descriptive, ambispective, and cross-sectional study. Patients diagnosed with metaphyseal fracture of the proximal humerus in a pediatric population younger than 13 years and with conservative treatment with splint placement or closed reduction and splint placement were reviewed systematically, and functional evaluation using the Quick DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) questionnaire and clinical evaluation were performed at the Regional General Ignacio Zaragoza Hospital, from January 1, 2007 to January 1, 2015.
Results: 57 patients were enrolled, 52.7% of whom were children (30 patients), while 47.3% were girls (27 patients). The results were satisfactory in patients younger than 12 years; from the age of 13, the risk of a higher incapacitating percentage increased.
Conclusion: Good radiological and clinical results were obtained with conservative management. Our results serve to guide conservative treatment of proximal humeral metaphyseal fractures in the pediatric population with criteria of age, percentage of displacement and bone angulation


REFERENCES

  1. Rose SH, Melton LJ III, Morrey BF. Epidemiologic features of humeral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;198:224-30.

  2. Kohler R, Trillaud JM. Fracture and fracture separation of the proximal humerus in children: report of 136 cases. J Pediatr Orthop. 1983;3:326-32.

  3. Lefèvre Y, Jorneau P, Angelliaume A. Proximal humerus fractures in children and adolescents. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100(1 Suppl): S149-56.

  4. Bahrs C, Zipplies S, Ochs BG, et al. Proximal humeral fractures in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009;29(3):238-42.

  5. Pahlavan S, Baldwin Keith D. Proximal humerus fractures in the pediatric population: a systematic review. J Child Orthop. 2011;5:187-94.

  6. Neer CS 2nd, Horwitz BS. Fractures of the proximal humeral epiphysial plate. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1965;41:24-31.

  7. Chaus GW, Carry PM, Pishkenari AK, et al. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced proximal humeral physeal fractures: a matched cohort.. J Pediatr Orthop. 2015;35(3):234-9.

  8. Dameron TB Jr, Reibel DB. Fractures involving the proximal humeral epiphyseal plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51(2):289-97

  9. Sohrab P, Keith D, et al. Proximal humerus fractures in the pediatric population: a systematic review. J Child Orthop. 2011;5:187-94.

  10. Vega-Caicedo R, Piñeros-Ramirez DF, Amador-Gutierrez JA. Descripción epidemiológica y evaluación de los desenlaces de interés de las fracturas de la extremidad superior del húmero en un grupo de niños. Rev Fac Med. 2014;62;3: 327-53.

  11. Beaty JH. Fractures of the proximal humerus and shaft in children. Instr Course Lect 1992;41:369-72.

  12. Sherr-Lurie N, Bialik GM, Ganel A, et al. Fractures of the humerus in the neonatal period. Isr Med Assoc J. 2011;13:363-5.

  13. Salter R, Harris W. Injuries involving the epiphyseal plates. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1963;45:587-622

  14. Hirschmann MT, Quarz V, Audige L, et al. Internal fixation of unstable proximal humerus fractures with an anatomically preshaped interlocking plate: a clinical and radiologic evaluation. J Trauma. 2007;63:1314-23.

  15. Burgos-Flores J, Gonzalez-Herranz P, Lopez-Mondejar JA, et al. Fractures of the proximal humeral epiphysis. Int Orthop. 1993;17(1):16-9.

  16. Canavese F, Athlani L, Marengo L, et al. Evaluation of upper-extremity function following surgical treatment of displaced proximal humerus fracures in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014;23(2):144-9.

  17. Popkin CA, Levine WN, Ahmad CS.. Evaluation and management of pediatric proximal humerus fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23:77-86.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Esp Med Quir. 2017;22