medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Anestesiología

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Authors instructions        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2018, Number 2

Rev Mex Anest 2018; 41 (2)

Massive subcutaneous emphysema in postoperative thoracic surgery. Review and treatment of the entity

Castillo-Aznar J, Delgado-Domingo JA, Tejedor-Vargas P, Peña-De Buen N, Mateo-Orobia AJ, Lafuente-Ojeda N
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 133-136
PDF size: 356.27 Kb.


Key words:

Subcutaneous emphysema, thoracic surgery, postoperative complication.

ABSTRACT

Subcutaneous emphysema can be defined as the aerial infiltration of the subcutaneous cellular tissue of the face, neck, trunk, abdomen and less frequent extremities. The main etiology is rupture of the respiratory tree. We present the case of a male who was operated for atypical resection of the right lower lobe due to lung neoplasia. The surgical procedure was uneventful. During the admission to the postoperative intensive care unit, there is a slight air leak in the thoracic drainage. Two hours later the patient started with tachypnea, increased respiratory work and subcutaneous thoracic emphysema that extended to the cervicofacial and palpebral zone, progressing towards the arms, abdominal wall and scrotum. Thoracic surgeon indicated replacement of the thoracic drainage and perform cutaneous incisions for the drainage of emphysema. The patient needed respiratory support and vasoactive drugs. After a correct pulmonary reexpansion, reduction of aerial leakage and progressive resolution of subcutaneous emphysema, the patient was extubated. The first choice in the management of subcutaneous emphysema is the expectant attitude. In the most serious cases, the priority is to control the airway and eliminate the triggering cause, and it is possible to propose invasive treatments that accelerate the resolution of the condition.


REFERENCES

  1. Abdel-lah O, Fernández-Fernández J, Roibás A, Álvarez D, Rizzo A, Pérez-Ricarte P y cols. Enfi sema subcutáneo secundario a perforación no traumática de colostomía. Cir Esp. 2003;74:108-110.

  2. Rivares EJ, Gil PP, García MM. Tratamiento conservador del enfi sema subcutáneo y neumomediastino. ORL Aragón. 2001;4:17-19.

  3. Mateos CA, Golpe GR, González RA, Sousa EA, González UC, Seirulo SM. Neumoescroto secundario a enfi sema subcutáneo masivo tras drenaje de un neumotórax espontáneo. Actas Urol Esp. 2004;28:606-609.

  4. Aghajanzadeh M, Dehnadi A, Ebrahimi H, Fallah KM, Khajeh JS, Amir MA, et al. Classifi cation and managemnet of subcutaneous emphysema: a 10 year experience. Indian J Surg. 2015;77:673-677.

  5. Williams DJ, Jaggar SI, Morgan CJ. Upper airway obstruction as a result of masssive subcutaneous emphysema following accidental removal of an intercostal drain. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94:390-392.

  6. Johnson CH, Lang SA, Bilal H, Rammohan KS. In patients with extensive subcutaneous emphysema, wich technique achieves maximal clinical resolution: infraclavicular incisions, subcutaneous drain insertion or suction on in situ chest drain? Interact Cardiovas Thorac Surg. 2014;18:825-829.

  7. Beck PL, Heitman SJ, Mody CH. Simple construction of a subcutaneous catheter for a treatment of severe subcutaneous emphysema. Chest. 2002;121:647-649.

  8. Herlan DB, Landreneau RJ, Ferson PF. Massive spontaneous subcutaneous emphysema. Acute management with infraclavicular “blow holes”. Chest. 1992;102:503-505.

  9. Alarcón-Meregildo K, Polo-Romero F, Beato-Pérez J. Tratamiento de enfi sema subcutáneo severo por microdrenaje. A propósito de un caso. Arch Bronconeumol. 2014;50:47-78.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

CÓMO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Anest. 2018;41