medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Ingeniería Biomédica

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2003, Number 2

<< Back

Rev Mex Ing Biomed 2003; 24 (2)

Evaluation of the combined bending and compression stress field in a human proximal femur

Urriolagoitia-Calderón G, Hernández GLH, Carbajal-Romero MF, Feria-Reyes CV, Noriega DZ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 6
Page: 170-175
PDF size: 156.71 Kb.


Key words:

Proximal femora, Compression, Bending, Numerical stress analysis.

ABSTRACT

Regarding the mechanical behavior of the femur, there is an interest to find out if it works under bending or compression. Accordingly, the stress field; over five cross sections along the femur stem, were studied, following a numerical approach with the Finite Element Method, which had been validated in a previous paper with reflective photoelasticity. For this purpose, loads were applied on the femur head as in Taylor’s paper. The numerical model considers the mechanical properties of the cortical and trabecular tissues. The results have shown that the femur stem is under asymmetric bending and the compression.


REFERENCES

  1. Urriolagoitia G, Hernandez LH, Domínguez VM, Ortiz HE, Carbajal MF, Ferrer LA. Analysis of the strain field of a human femur subjected to load by reflection photoelasticity. International Design Conference-Design 2000, Dubrovnik. 2000: 23-26, 259-264.

  2. Glisson RR, Musgrave DS, Graham RD, Vail TP. Validity of photoelastic strain measurement on cadaveric proximal femora. ASME J Biomech Eng 2000; 122: 423-429.

  3. Yoshioka Y, Siu D, Cooke TDV. The anatomy and functional axes of femur. J Bone Joint Surg 1987; 69-A: 873-880.

  4. Taylor ME, Tanner KE, Freeman MAR, Yettram AL. Stress and strain distribution within the intact femur: Compression or bending? Med Eng Phys 1996; 18(2): 122-131.

  5. McNamara BP, Cristofolini L, Toni A, Taylor D. Relationship between bone-prosthesis bonding and load transfer in total hip reconstruction. J Biomech 1997; 30(6): 621-630.

  6. Brekelmans WAM, Poort HW, Slooff TJ. A new method to analyse the mechanical behaviour of skeletal parts. Acta Orthp Belgica 1972; 43: 301-309.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Ing Biomed. 2003;24