medigraphic.com
Órgano Ofical de la Facultad de Estomatología de la Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla

2017, Number 58

<< Back Next >>

Oral 2017; 18 (58)

Malocclusion group Prevalence according on GOSLON analysis in lip and palate cleft patients, from six to 12 years attended in Orthodontic Service in Hospital para el Niño Poblano

García-Garza CI, Ochoa-Cáceres S, San Martín-Brieke W, Salazar-Cruz MÁ, Gutiérrez-Brito M

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 1520-1525
PDF size: 280.01 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction. The lip and palate cleft (LPC) is the most frequent and important congenital malformation of all facial abnormalities. Dental malocclusion is the main complication in patients with lip and palate cleft. The GOSLON analysis is an instrument developed to categorize the malocclusion group in children with cleft lip and palate, we can establish the orthodontic preventive, interceptive and corrective treatment of patients with cleft lip and palate. Objective. To identify the prevalence of the malocclusion group according to the GOSLON analysis in study models of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate who attend the orthodontic service of the HNP from 2016 to 2017. Methodology. An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional, retrospective study, having as a unit of analysis 50 models of study of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate of six to 12 years old who attend the Orthodontics Service during 2016 to 2017. We enumerated each study model and analyzed the variables including age, sex, side of the fissure and the malocclusion analysis was performed using the GOSLON analysis. Results. A prevalence of the masculine gender was found with an average of 8 years and the left side fissure with the highest occurrence. The most prevalent group of malocclusion was 4 with 48%, followed group 2 with 22%, group 3 and 5 with 14%, finding in less prevalence the group of malocclusion 1 with 2%. Conclusion. The GOSLON analysis proved to be a reliable instrument to analyze patients with unilateral FLAP, giving us a long-term prognosis and the best treatment for the correction of malocclusion problems.


REFERENCES

  1. López GA. Análisis de las alteraciones oclusales y morfología craneofacial del paciente fisurado. [Tesis doctoral]. España: Universidad de Valencia; 2015.

  2. Ministerio de Salud de Chile. Guía clínica fisura labiopalatina. 2009.

  3. González OC, Solís MC, et al. Estudio ecológico en México (2003-2009) sobre labio y/o paladar hendido y factores sociodemográficos, socioeconómicos y de contaminación asociados. 2011. An Pediatr (Barc). 2011; 74(6): 377-87.

  4. Aparicio RJ. Temas selectos de estomatología pediátrica asociada a factores genéticos en un hospital de tercer nivel. 1ª Ed, acd Editorial. Puebla; 2016. 224

  5. Trigos MI. Resumen histórico de la atención de labio y paladar hendidos en México. Cirugía Plastica. 2012; 22(2): 104-16.

  6. Ugalde MF. Clasificación de la maloclusión en los planos anteroposterior, vertical y transversal. Revista ADM 2007; 54(3): 97-109.

  7. Mars M, Plint D, Houston W, Bergland O, Semb G. The Goslon Yardstick: a new system of assessing dental arch relationships in children with unilateral clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate Journal. 1987; 24(4): 314-22.

  8. Mejía AA, Suárez VD. Factores de riesgo materno predominantes asociados con labio leporino y paladar hendido en los recién nacidos. 2012: 4(2): 55-62.

  9. Secretaría de Salud. Prevención, tratamiento y rehabilitación de niños con labio y paladar hendido. 2006.

  10. Secretaría de salud. Manual de Guías clínicas de fisura labiopalatina. 2015

  11. Hathorn I, Harry DR, Mars M. The Goslon Yarsdstick applied a consecutive series of patients with unilateral clefts on the lip and palate. Cleft Palate. Craneofacial Journal. 1996; 33(6): 494-96.

  12. Da Silva OG, Calvano F, Okada OT, Alcoforado AG. Oclusión en niños con fisura unilateral completa de labio y paladar: Comparación entre dos protocolos quirúrgicos. Rev Esp Ortod. 2003; 33: 31-40.

  13. Dogan et al. Dental Arch Relationships in Turkish Patients With Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Born Between 1976 and 1990: A Comparison With Eurocleft. The Cleft Palate– Craniofacial Journal 2014; 51(1): 70-75.

  14. Isshi T, Munetada I, Yasumura T, Miyazaki H, Sueishi K. Relationship between ortodontic treatmen Plan and Goslon Yarsdstick Assesment in Japanese Patients with unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: One-stage vs Two STAGES Palatoplasty. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2016; 57(3): 159-68.

  15. Southall P, Walters M, Singer S. The Influence of Orthodontic Treatment on the Goslon Score of Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 2012; 49(2): 215-20.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com