medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Urología

Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2018, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2018; 78 (4)

Bilateral kidney stones and grade V calcified double-J catheter: A case in which the percutaneous approach in the supine position was utilized

Camacho-Castro AJ, Inzunza-Aguilar MC, Aceves-Tello LS, Ramírez-Hermosillo JA, López-Chávez MÁ, Hernández-Félix VP
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 310-313
PDF size: 336.78 Kb.


Key words:

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Calcified double-J catheter, Valdivia position.

ABSTRACT

Background: Due to advances made in the equipment and surgical techniques of endourology over the last two decades, the majority of surgeries for treating stone disease are minimally invasive procedures. In addition, a wide range of options for the management of complications derived from the use of external material, such as double-J catheters, is now available.
Clinical case: A 35-year-old woman presented with colicky pain in the left renal fossa that radiated into the ipsilateral flank, as well as unmeasured fever, dysuria, and hematuria. The evaluation protocol revealed bilateral kidney stones with left hydronephrosis, for which a double-J catheter was placed. One year later, the catheter was completely calcified. Endoscopic bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy and lithotripsy at the distal portion of the catheter were performed with no incidents. Both nephrostomy catheters were removed 1 week after the procedure and the double-J catheter was removed 15 days later. Control tomography confirmed the stone-free rate. The patient is currently asymptomatic, with adequate micturition.
Conclusions: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position offers important advantages to both the patient and the surgeon. The choice of approach and the position utilized for kidney puncture should be individualized for each case.


REFERENCES

  1. Quaresima L, et al. Safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the Galdakao-Modifiec Supine Valdivia position: A prospective analysis. DOI: https://doi. org/10.4081/aiua.2016.2.93

  2. Falahatkar S, Mokhtari G, Teimoori M. An update in supine versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a metaanalysis. Urol J 2016;13(5):2814-2822.

  3. Zapata-González J, Camacho-Castro J, García S. Nefrolitotomía percutánea en posición supina: nuestra experiencia. Rev Mex Urol 2014;74(6):336-341.

  4. Heinze-Rodríguez A, et al. Manejo de litiasis renal con nefrolitotomía percutánea: Experiencia en un hospital de referencia. Rev Mex Urol 2014;74(4):211-215.

  5. Barradas-Huervo E, et al. Experiencia en nefrolitotomía percutánea en el Centro Médico Nacional “20 de Noviembre”. Rev Mex Urol 2008;68(2):69-87

  6. Camacho-Castro AJ, et al. Manejo de catéteres doble J calcificados en el Hospital General “Dr. Manuel Gea González”. Rev Mex Urol 2013;73(4):155-159.

  7. Castillo O, et al. Cirugía percutánea de la litiasis coraliforme. Rev Chil Cir 2008;60(5):393-397.

  8. Yu J, et al. Risk factors for pulmonary complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Medicine 2016;95:35.

  9. Skolarikos A, et al. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and its Legacy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2004.08.009

  10. Karalar M, et al. Effects of parenchymal thickness and stone density values on percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.898212

  11. Michel MS, et al. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo. 2006.10.020




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Urol. 2018;78