medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Médica Grupo Angeles

Órgano Oficial del Hospital Angeles Health System
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
    • Names and affiliations of the Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • About us
    • Data sharing policy
    • Stated aims and scope
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2018, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Acta Med 2018; 16 (3)

Initial experience of a robotic thoracic surgery program in lung cancer in Mexico. Report of two cases

Mier JM, Cortés JG, Navarrete M, Gómez-Nieto G
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 4
Page: 252-254
PDF size: 866.76 Kb.


Key words:

Robotic surgery, robot assisted surgery, video assisted surgery.

ABSTRACT

Open lobectomy presents a significant morbidity; on the contrary, video-assisted surgery presents less blood loss, lower morbidity and shorter hospital stay, among other advantages. In expert hands it presents good results; however, it requires a long learning curve, which is limiting in some centers. These limitations can be solved with the Da Vinci robotic system. In this study, we present our initial experience with two lobectomies for stage I lung cancer, performed with the Da Vinci surgical system. For our knowledge, this is the first report in Mexico. They are two patients of 63 and 62 years old, male and female respectively, with an adenocarcinoma lung in the upper left lobe in stage Ia. Both patients underwent superior left lobectomy plus mediastinal lymphadenectomy. The results of a blood loss less than 100 mL in each case, retention of chest drainage two and three days and intrahospital stay of three and four days respectively, without complications to be highlighted. We can conclude that the robotic approach to pulmonary lobectomy for cancer is possible and safe, performing the oncologically correct procedure as if it were performed by classical video-assisted surgery.


REFERENCES

  1. Ginsberg RJ, Rubinstein LV. Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Study Group. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995; 60 (3): 615-622; discussion 622-3.

  2. Chen FF, Zhang D, Wang YL, Xiong B. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy versus open lobectomy in patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013; 39 (9): 957-963.

  3. Emmert A, Straube C, Buentzel J, Roever C. Robotic versus thoracoscopic lung resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96 (95): e7633.

  4. Veronesi G, Novellis P, Voulaz E, Alloisio M. Robot-assisted surgery for lung cancer: state of the art and perspectives. Lung Cancer. 2016; 101: 28-34.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta Med. 2018;16