medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Salud Pública de México

Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2018, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

salud publica mex 2018; 60 (5)

Position of the Latin American Society of Nutrition (SLAN) on the management of conflict of interest

Barquera S, García-Chávez CG, Navarro-Rosenblatt D, Uauy R, Pérez-Escamilla R, Martorell R, Ramírez-Zea M, Sánchez-Bazán K
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 28
Page: 592-597
PDF size: 224.32 Kb.


Key words:

conflict of interest, ethics committees, nutrition policy, food industry.

ABSTRACT

There is solid evidence documenting relationships between the food and beverage industry and academia that shows that industry sponsored research is likely to bias results in favor of industry. In Latin America, examples of these situations have been documented in Mexico, Brazil, Chile, Peru, Colombia, and Ecuador, among others. Due to the urgent need for studying and managing relationships between the food and beverage industry and the field of health and nutrition research, in 2017, the President of the Latin American Society of Nutrition (SLAN) appointed a Conflict of Interest Committee (CCI). The CCI was charged with the development of a proposal of a position for the management of conflict of interest (COI) for consideration by SLAN. This document details the work of CCI, and the position adopted by SLAN.


REFERENCES

  1. Rothman DJ. Consequences of industry relationships for Public Health and Medicine. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(1):55. https://doi.org/10.2105/ AJPH.2011.300507

  2. Gomes F da S. Conflitos de interesse em alimentação e nutrição. Cad Saude Publica. 2015;31(10):2039-46. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102- 311XPE011015

  3. Mozaffarian D. Conflict of interest and the role of the food industry in Nutrition research. JAMA. 2017;317(17):1755. https://doi.org/10.1001/ jama.2017.3456

  4. Richter J. Conflicts of interest and policy implementation reflections from the fields of health and infant feeding. Ginebra: IBFAN-GIFA, 2005.

  5. Popkin BM. Nutrition transition and the global diabetes epidemic. Curr Diab Rep. 2015;15(9):64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-015-0631-4

  6. García-Chávez CG, Rodríguez-Ramírez S, Rivera JA, Monterrubio- Flores E, Tucker KL. Sociodemographic factors are associated with dietary patterns in Mexican schoolchildren. Public Health Nut. 2017;21(4):702-10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980017003299

  7. Rivera JA, Pedraza LS, Aburto TC, Batis C, Sánchez-Pimienta TG, González de Cosío T, et al. Overview of the dietary intakes of the Mexican population: results from the National Health and Nutrition Survey 2012. J Nutr. 2016;146(9):1851S-5S. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.115.221275

  8. Popkin BM. Bellagio Declaration 2013: countering Big Food’s undermining of healthy food policies. Obes Rev. 2013;14(Suppl 2):9-10. https://doi. org/10.1111/obr.12104

  9. Gaona-Pineda EB, Martínez-Tapia B, Arango-Angarita A, Valenzuela- Bravo D, Gómez-Acosta LM, Shamah-Levy T, et al. Consumo de grupos de alimentos y factores sociodemográficos en población mexicana. Salud Publica Mex. 2018;60(3):272-82. https://doi.org/10.21149/8803

  10. Lopez-Olmedo N, Carriquiry AL, Rodriguez-Ramirez S, Ramirez-Silva I, Espinosa-Montero J, Hernandez-Barrera L, et al. Usual intake of added sugars and saturated fats is high while dietary fiber is low in the Mexican population. J Nutr. 2016;146(9):1856S-65S. https://doi.org/10.3945/ jn.115.218214

  11. Popkin B, Monteiro C, Swinburn B. Overview: Bellagio Conference on Program and Policy Options for Preventing Obesity in the Lowand Middle-Income Countries. Obes Rev. 2013;14(S2):1-8. https://doi. org/10.1111/obr.12108

  12. Canella DS, Martins APB, Silva HFR, Passanha A, Lourenço BH. Food and beverage industries’ participation in health scientific events: considerations on conflicts of interest. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2015;38(4):339-43.

  13. Bekelman JE. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in Biomedical research: A Systematic Review. JAMA. 2003;289(4):454-65. https:// doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.4.454

  14. Nestle M. Food industry funding of nutrition research: the relevance of history for current debates. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(11):1685-6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5400

  15. Kearns CE, Schmidt LA, Glantz SA. Sugar industry and coronary heart disease research: a historical analysis of internal industry documents. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(11):1680-5. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed. 2016.5394

  16. Chartres N, Fabbri A, Bero LA. Association of industry sponsorship with outcomes of nutrition studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(12):1769-77. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed. 2016.6721

  17. Lesser LI, Ebbeling CB, Goozner M, Wypij D, Ludwig DS. Relationship between funding source and conclusion among nutrition-related scientific articles. PLoS Med. 2007;4(1):0041-6. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pmed.0040005

  18. Katan MB. Does industry sponsorship undermine the integrity of nutrition research? PLoS Med. 2007;4(1):e6. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pmed.0040006

  19. Vartanian LR, Schwartz MB, Brownell KD. Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(4):667-75. https://doi.org/10.2105/ AJPH.2005.083782

  20. Comité de expertos académicos nacionales del etiquetado frontal de alimentos y bebidas no alcohólicas para una mejor salud. Sistema de etiquetado frontal de alimentos y bebidas para México: una estrategia para la toma de decisiones saludables. Salud Publica Mex. 2018;60(4):479-86. https://doi.org/10.21149/9615

  21. Charvel S, Cobo F, Hernández-Ávila M. A process to establish nutritional guidelines to address obesity: lessons from Mexico. J Public Health Policy. 2015;36(4):426-39. https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2015.28

  22. Barquera S, Campos I, Rivera JA. Mexico attempts to tackle obesity: the process, results, push backs and future challenges. Obes Rev. 2013;14(S2):69-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12096

  23. Monteiro CA, Cannon G. The impact of transnational “big food” companies on the south: a view from brazil. PLoS Med. 2012;9(7):1-5. https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001252

  24. Corvalán C, Reyes M, Garmendia ML, Uauy R. Structural responses to the obesity and non-communicable diseases epidemic: The Chilean Law of Food Labeling and Advertising. Obes Rev. 2013;14(2):79-87. https://doi. org/10.1111/obr.12099

  25. Steinbrook R. Controlling conflict of interest--proposals from the Institute of Medicine. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(21):2160-3. https://doi. org/10.1056/NEJMp0810200

  26. Reed Q. Sitting on the fence: Conflicts of interest and how to regulate them [Internet]. Bergen: U4 Issue, 2008 [citado marzo 27, 2017]. Disponible en: https://www.u4.no/publications/sitting-on-the-fence-conflicts-ofinterest- and-how-to-regulate-them.pdf

  27. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud. Dieta, nutrición y prevención de enfermedades crónicas. Ginebra: OMS/FAO, 2003.

  28. WHO Regional Office for Europe. Nutrient Profile Model. København: WHO, 2015.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

salud publica mex. 2018;60