medigraphic.com
ISSN 1665-2576 (Print)

2018, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2018; 19 (3)

Robotic surgery

Hernández RMA

Language: Spanish
References: 30
Page: 96-102
PDF size: 174.04 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: The robotic surgery, with the growing evolution of health services, it has reached great development in recent decades. Internationally it has been three decades. In Mexico it has had a fleeting beginning; with the abandonment of complete programs due to the costs to which the institutions were submitted, but we must remember that patient´s safety and quality services are expensive. In our hospital, the development of a robotic surgery program has been implemented to provide mayor quality and safety for our patients during the development of surgical procedures. Material and methods: A review of the national and international literature with Clinical Key, on robotics programs, those surgeries in which it is used, as well as the care safety and quality standards. Obtaining 30 representative references that meet the research criteria, for this topic’s review. Conclusions: Science and technology have joined to create a device that allows us to provide the surgical vanguard, quality, and safety in different specialties. We must continue to look for results to demonstrate that this is another useful and viable option for the treatment of those patients that require surgery also emphasize that the quality of health services and the safety of patients are expensive and that it is always worth paying for it. In our Centro Medico Naval we’ve had good results with robotic surgery, improving its efficiency and effectiveness in patient management and supplies use.


REFERENCES

  1. Moreno-Portillo M, Valenzuela-Salazar C, Quiroz-Guadarrama CD, Pachecho-Gahbler C, Rojano-Rodríguez M, Rojano-Rodríguez M. Cirugía robótica. Gaceta Médica de México. 2014; 150: 293-297.

  2. Sánchez-Martín FM, Jiménez-Schlegl P, Millán-Rodríguez F, Salvador-Bayarri J, Monllau-Font V, Palou-Redorta J, Villavicencio-Mavrich H. Historia de la robótica: de Arquitas de Tarento al robot Da Vinci. Parte II. Actas Urol Esp. 2007; 31: 69-76.

  3. Sackier JM, Wang Y. Robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery. From concept to development. Surg Endosc. 1994; 8: 63-66.

  4. Herron DM, Marohn M, SAGES-MIRA Robotic Surgery Consensus Group. A consensus document on robotic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2008; 22: 313-325.

  5. Chen CC, Falcone T. Robotic Surgery: past, present, and the future. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 52: 335-343.

  6. Wilson EB. The evolution of robotic general surgery. Scand J Surg. 2009; 98: 125-129.

  7. Najarian S, Fallahnezhad M, Afshari E. Advances in medical robotic systems with specific applications in surgery--a review. J Med Eng Technol. 2011; 35: 19-33.

  8. Rodríguez E, Chitwood WR. Robotics in cardiac surgery. Scand J Surg. 2009; 98: 120-124.

  9. Suri RM, Burkhart HM, Daly RC et al. Robotic mitral valve repair for all prolapse subsets using techniques identical to open valvuloplasty: Establishing the benchmark against which percutaneous interventions should be judged. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011; 142: 970-979.

  10. Ballantyne GH. The pitfalls of laparoscopic surgery: challenges for robotic and telerobotic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002; 12: 1-5.

  11. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, et al. Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arco Surg. 2003; 138: 777-784.

  12. Taylor R, Stulberg D. Excerpts from the final report for the Second International Workshop on Robotics and Computer Assisted Medical Interventions. Comput Aided Surg. 1997; 2: 78-85.

  13. Lavery HJ, Small AC, Samadi DB, Palese MA. Laparoscopic transition of robotic partial nephrectomy: the learning curve for an experienced laparoscopic surgeon. JSLS. 2011; 15: 291-297.

  14. Nikiteas N, Roukos D, Kouraklis G. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery perspectives for tailoring and optimal surgical option. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2011; 8: 295-298.

  15. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, Sarle R, Hemal A, Peabody JO y cols. Prostatectomía radical laparoscópica y asistida por robot: el establecimiento de un programa estructurado y análisis preliminar de los resultados. J Urol. 2002; 169: 945-949.

  16. Haseebuddin M, Benway BM, Cabello JM, Bhayani SB. Nefrectomía parcial asistida por robot: evaluación de curva de aprendizaje para un cirujano renal experimentado. J Endourol. 2010; 24: 57-61.

  17. Ou YC, Yang CR, Wang J, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy assisted robotics: the learning curve of the first 100 cases. Int J Urol. 2010; 17: 635-640.

  18. Herrell SD, Smith JA. Prostatectomía robótica asistida por laparoscopía: ¿cuál es la curva de aprendizaje? Urology. 2005; 66: 105-107.

  19. Tewari A, Sooriakumaran P, Bloch DA, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Hebert AE, Wiklund P. Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012; 62: 1-15.

  20. Stoianovici D, Webster R, Kavoussi L. Robotic tools for minimally invasive urologic surgery. In: Ramakumar S, Jarrett TW, Ramakumar R. Complications of urologic laparoscopic surgery: recognition, management and prevention. Norway: Informa Healthcare Location of Publish; 2005, pp. 1-17.

  21. Galvani C, Horgan S. Robots en cirugía general: Presente y futuro. Cir Esp. 2005; 78: 138-147.

  22. Müller-Stich BP, Reiter MA, Wente MN, Bintintan VV, Köninger J, Büchler MW et al. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic fundoplication: Short-term outcome of a pilot randomised controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2007; 21: 1800-1805.

  23. Horgan S, Galvani C, Gorodner MV, Omelanczuck P, Elli F, Moser F et al. Robotic-assisted Heller myotomy versus laparoscopic Heller myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: Multicenter study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005; 9: 1020-1029.

  24. Dunn DH, Johnson EM, Morphew JA, Dilworth HP, Krueguer JL, Banerji N. Robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: A 3-year singlecenter experience. Dis Esophagus. 2013; 26: 159-166.

  25. Tieu K, Allison N, Snyder B, Wilson T, Toder M, Wilson EB. Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: Updated from 2 high-volume centers. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013; 9: 284-288.

  26. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Sbrana F, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Buchs NC et al. Robotic liver surgery: Results for 70 resections. Surgery. 2011; 149: 29-39.

  27. Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, Elli EF, Shah G, Addeo P et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: Single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc. 2010; 24: 1646-1657.

  28. Kwak JM, Kim SH, Kim J, Son DN, Baek SJ, Cho JS. Robotic vs laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: Short-term outcomes of a case-control study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011; 54: 151-156.

  29. Marx DE. Seguridad del Paciente y la “cultura”: Una Guía para Los ejecutivos de atención médica en Washington Manual of patient safety and quality improvement. Nueva York: Columbia University; 2001. Disponible en: https://psnet.ahrq.gov/resources/resource/1582/patient-safety-and-the-just-culture-a-primer-for-health-care-executives

  30. Larson JA, Johnson MH, Bhayani. HYPERLINK "https://www.journalacs.org/article/S1072-7515(13)01193-9/fulltext" Application of surgical safety standards to robotic surgery: five principles of ethics for nonmaleficence. J Am Coll Surg. 2014; 218: 290-293.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com